64 pages • 2 hours read
Bertrand RussellA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Index of Terms
Themes
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Aristotle (384-322 BCE) is, along with Plato, one of the principal ancient Greek philosophers. Aristotle’s metaphysics is partly based on Plato’s ideas, but reflects a more pragmatic and less mystical interpretation of reality. Aristotle proposes that all things are divided into “universals” and “substances.” Substances are particular things, whereas universals are types or classes of things. Furthermore, a substance can have qualities which are inherent to it.
Substances consist of a union of form and matter: In the case of a marble statue, the matter is the marble, and the form is the shape of the statue. Aristotle believes that a human being has two parts, the soul (form) and the body (matter). The form is what makes a particular piece of matter one coherent and particular thing. Form thus constitutes the essence, or defining nature, of a thing. The relation of form to matter is that of actuality to potentiality: Bare matter is potential, and it becomes actual by acquiring a particular form.
Aristotle’s ideas about ethics are contained in three treatises, the most important of which is the Nicomachean Ethics. Russell sees the Ethics as embodying common sense and the values of “decent, well-behaved citizens” (173). Aristotle identifies happiness as the highest good and the goal of all ethical action. The human soul has two parts, rational and irrational. The rational part of the soul guides the human will in its actions and choices, while the irrational part has to do with appetite, emotion, and physical growth. Aristotle analyzes various virtues and defines them as the “golden mean” between two extremes. According to Aristotle, the highest virtue belongs only to a few, and thus in his view ethics is, to some degree, aristocratic and exclusionary. For example, Aristotle believes that some people are born belonging to a lower social class by nature and not just via familial socioeconomic status, thus justifying social inequality and slavery.
Aristotle’s political theories, as outlined in his treatise Politics, center on the Greek city state as he knew it in his youth, before Alexander the Great began to establish the Greek empire. As such, Russell sees Aristotle’s political theories as being a little out-of-date in the context of his time.
For Aristotle, the State is “the highest kind of community” and aims “at the highest good” (185). Government should function in the interests of the whole people, and tyranny is to be deplored. Aristotle establishes a scale of values by which to judge various forms of government. His operating assumption is that most existing governments are bad and that even weaker forms of government are preferable to tyranny. In the end, Aristotle prefers monarchy but arrives at a “qualified defence of democracy” (190) as being the best form of government.
Russell argues that Aristotle’s influence was strongest in the field of logic. Aristotle’s theories of logic centered on deductive and inductive reasoning. Aristotle used the model of the syllogism—a form of reasoning in which two assumed statements can be used to draw a new—to demonstrate how new knowledge can be created from what is already known. Aristotle was less prolific in his discussion of induction, which he said was a form of knowledge generation that moves from the specific to the general.
Aristotle’s theories on physics are expounded in his books Physics and On the Heavens. Aristotle, and the ancient Greeks in general, based their ideas of physical movement on the movement of animals and of the heavenly bodies. Aristotle considered physics to be the study of nature, broadly speaking, and he saw nature as governed by teleology: Various causes contribute to bringing about natural processes.
Aristotle’s ideas about astronomy, although mistaken in many points, were accepted until the time of Galileo and the rise of modern science. For example, he believed the earth to be the center of the universe and everything from the moon upwards to be eternal and indestructible.
Russell sees mathematics, and particularly “the art of mathematical demonstration” (208), as the most original Greek contribution to thought. The Greeks applied their mathematical discoveries to geometry and astronomy as well as to navigation and other practical problems. Euclid was the greatest of the Greek geometers. In astronomy, Pythagoras discovered that the earth was spherical and Aristarchus of Samos arrived at the Copernican hypothesis almost two thousand years before Copernicus.
As with Socrates and Plato, Russell believes that Aristotle—the third “giant” of ancient Greek philosophy—has both “merits” and “demerits” and intends to highlight both. Aristotle's pragmatic approach to knowledge and his wide-ranging treatises embody the multidisciplinary nature of philosophy during his own time; his ideas would exercise an enormous influence on later philosophers, scientists, and political theorists. However, Russell regrets that Aristotle’s influence was so dominant, since it led to the minimization or exclusion of other ideas during much of Western history. As a mathematician, Russell values Euclid and Pythagoras highly. In his eyes, Aristotle’s outsized influence, regardless of his successful contributions to philosophy, created a long period of homogeneity in philosophical thought.
Aristotle’s Politics forms an important contrast to Plato’s Republic, further highlighting the way in which Aristotle’s thought diverges from Plato’s. While Plato imagines an ideal state helmed by “philosopher kings,” Aristotle’s more pragmatic sensibility is once again revealed in the systematic way he examines all existing forms of government, seeking the most practical and realistic solution for a real-life state. His suspicion of tyranny leads him to defend democracy—a system that would be unthinkable in the centralized and strictly hierarchical Republic of Plato.
Russell also sees Aristotle’s theory of universals as an advance on Plato’s theory of ideas and as influencing much subsequent philosophical debate about the relationship between universals and particulars. At the same time, he argues that Aristotle’s achievements in logic and science were flawed, and that due to these flaws, Aristotle’s unquestioned authority for so many centuries slowed progress in Western thought.
By Bertrand Russell
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
European History
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Nobel Laureates in Literature
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
SuperSummary Staff Picks
View Collection