47 pages • 1 hour read
Robert BoltA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
A Man for All Seasons is set in the early 1500s, during which time Catholicism was the primary type of Christianity practiced in Western Europe; Eastern Europe and some other areas favored Orthodox Christianity. The Catholic Church, which answered to the Pope, had been the prevailing religious authority for centuries, and Catholicism was the state religion of many nations, including England. Some people, most notably the German friar Martin Luther (1483-1546), raised objections to some of the Catholic Church’s practices. Luther argued that practices such as the observance of seven sacraments instead of two, the appointment of a Pope, and the reliance on priests for biblical interpretation did not have clear precedents in the Bible. He also argued against the Catholic practice of selling indulgences, which allowed people to essentially pay for their own absolution and deliverance. Luther was not alone in his objections, and proto-Protestant sentiments soon spread to England and other countries.
King Henry VIII (1491-1547) ruled England during this time of change. He was married to Catherine of Aragon, who had previously been married to his brother, Arthur. After Arthur died, Catherine and Henry received the Pope’s permission to marry on the basis that the marriage between Catherine and Arthur, which lasted only 20 weeks, had never been consummated and was therefore not wholly legally binding. Though their marriage was initially a happy one, Catherine did not bear Henry a son. Without a clear male heir to the throne (Henry did have a daughter at the time, Mary), Henry risked throwing his country into upheaval and even war if he were to die. England had just been through such a time during the War of the Roses (1455-1487), a bitter fight for the throne that only ended when Henry’s father, Henry VII, united the warring factions and restored the nation’s stability. Henry knew that he needed a son, and he knew Catherine was likely too old to give him one. What was more, he had fallen in love with Anne Boleyn, the niece of the Duke of Norfolk. Henry petitioned for a divorce from Catherine. Though the two of them had been married for years, Henry tried to argue that the marriage was not valid, claiming that Catherine and Arthur had consummated their union after all.
When the Pope proved unsympathetic to Henry’s request, several seemingly disparate factors came together all at once. Catholic monasteries in England generated a lot of revenue that the Crown could not tax. Henry’s spending habits were extravagant; an opportunity to make money by dissolving the monasteries was tempting. To secure his divorce, remarry, hopefully gain a son, and line his coffers, Henry turned to the growing Protestant movement, creating the Church of England. He formally broke with Rome, and England became officially Protestant. The shift in England’s politics and laws was profound. Protestants, who had so far feared persecution for going against Catholic doctrine, suddenly found their beliefs, for the most part, legitimized. Catholics were now persecuted, as it was not considered acceptable to hold different religious beliefs from the king. Thomas More and other staunch Catholics like him were forced to choose between their religion and their sovereign. Because More was a close adviser to the king, his views and actions were particularly closely scrutinized.
Thomas More subscribed to a philosophy called Christian humanism, and he is remembered as one of the movement’s most influential writers and thinkers. Christian humanism uses the lens of Christian scripture to argue for values like rationalism, individual freedom, and human dignity. Many Christian humanists based their beliefs and arguments on the works of ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle and Socrates, both of whom are mentioned in A Man for All Seasons. Another major Christian humanist thinker was Erasmus, a Dutch Catholic theologian and personal friend to Thomas More. More and Erasmus are somewhat unusual, as most Christian humanists in the 1500s moved toward Protestantism.
More was a man of many contradictions. His most famous piece of writing is Utopia, a political satire that is in many ways aligned with Christian humanist thinking. In this work, More describes what he posits as a perfect society, though he also suggests that such a society could never really exist. In his perfect society, he includes some things that do not align with his stated beliefs: Utopia has female priests, priests who marry, and even more controversial social programs like euthanasia, none of which are acceptable from a Catholic standpoint. Similarly, the version of More presented in A Man for All Seasons sometimes appears to contradict himself. He claims that he believes in following the law at all times, because failing to do so might lead society to collapse. However, he is prepared to break the law when he feels that it is unjust or goes against God. More was a complex person in his own life, and Robert Bolt brings that complexity to the stage.
Bertolt Brecht (1898-1956) was a German playwright and poet. He had an unusual view of theater that had a big influence on Bolt. Brecht’s plays were explicitly political, encouraging the audience to reflect on their own lives, their complicity in injustice, and the potential for social progress. He rejected the notion that characters in plays ought to be relatable or sympathetic, instead seeing them as agents for growth and change. In Brecht’s plays, it is common for characters to break the fourth wall and remind audiences that what they are watching is not real. Sometimes, actors will change costumes on stage, or parts of the backstage will be visible to the audience. Plays usually end without a catharsis, meaning that they do not allow audience members to release their negative emotions in the theater. Brecht believed that catharsis made audiences less willing to take action in the real world, as they had already seen the issue resolved on stage.
Bolt uses some of these techniques in A Man for All Seasons, though he is not strictly following in Brecht’s footsteps. Bolt’s play raises some issues of social justice, including questions about the role of the law, personal convictions, and religious persecution. The Common Man is a distinctly Brechtian character who speaks directly to the audience, changes costumes on stage, and makes it clear that the action taking place is theatrical, not real. By including the Common Man, Bolt reminds audiences of the importance of ordinary people’s perspectives in political matters. Unlike Brecht’s work, A Man for All Seasons does include a cathartic climax where More is executed. Because Bolt’s play is discussing events that happened centuries ago, he is not putting out a clear call for audiences to take action against ongoing injustice, though he does call for them to reflect on their own lives through the lens of the Common Man. Bolt uses Brechtian theatrical elements, but his story is ultimately a work of historical fiction that contains no clear call to action.