logo

65 pages 2 hours read

W.G. Sebald

Austerlitz

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2001

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Pages 114-132Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Pages 114-124 Summary

As they walk along the Thames the following day, the narrator tells Austerlitz about a story he read in that morning’s newspaper about a man who, overcome with grief after his wife’s death, killed himself with a guillotine he meticulously constructed. Looking at the narrator with an alarmed facial expression, Austerlitz says he understands why the man was meticulous: to avoid the ignominy of a botched end to a miserable life.

The two men arrive at the Royal Observatory; as usual, Austerlitz takes photographs. He begins a monologue about time, the linear conception of which, he argues, is so artificial and arbitrary that all his life he’s refused to own any sort of clock. If, as Newton thought, time is a river, where does it originate and where does it empty? It seems human life is governed less by time than by weather, which is both unpredictable and cyclical: “an unquantifiable dimension which disregards linear regularity […and] evolves in no one knows what direction” (116). Austerlitz wonders whether he avoids clocks out of hope it’s possible to return to moments of the past—to regain lost time.

At dusk, the two men leave the observatory and cross Greenwich Park with a view of London. Austerlitz recalls seeing a painting of this view by J. M. W. Turner in one of the abandoned country houses around Oxford that he and his teacher Hilary explored during Austerlitz’s time at college. In the house, they encountered the friendly owner, James Ashman, who, lacking money for upkeep, was using the house to store grain he had begun farming. Ashman showed Austerlitz and Hilary the billiards room he’d recently reopened after it had been shut for 150 years, and inside hung the painting of Greenwich Park. The room was sealed so tightly that hardly a layer of dust accumulated, making it seem as if the room had escaped time.

When the government requisitioned his house during World War II, Ashman hid the entrance to his former nursery. When he reentered the nursery after the war, Ashman saw his toy version of Noah’s Ark and the notches he furiously carved in his nightstand on the eve of his departure to boarding school. Seeing these forgotten things evoked old feelings “as if the chasm of time were opening up before him” (124). As the same fury he had felt before his departure for school welled up in him, he lost himself and fired his rifle at the coach house’s clock tower.

Pages 125-132 Summary

Two weeks prior to their meeting in Greenwich Park, Austerlitz saw a watercolor by J. M. W. Turner called Funeral at Lausanne (pictured) that reminded him of the funerals for Evelyn and Alphonso Fitzpatrick at the Mawddach Estuary in Wales. The watercolor of a small, slanting procession appearing before a vast landscape reminded Austerlitz how Alphonso died picking his favorite apples while Evelyn died contorted in bed. Turner visited the Mawddach Estuary in 1798, when he was the same age as Austerlitz was at the Fitzpatricks’ funeral in 1957.

Austerlitz recalls that after Alphonso and Evelyn’s funeral, Gerald’s mother sold Andromeda Lodge and moved to the US, after which Austerlitz never saw her again. With his share of the sale, Gerald bought a Cessna airplane so he could continue the flying he’d started in the Air Cadet Corps at Stower Grange. On a flight with Austerlitz, Gerald explained the unique system of ornithology he’d developed at Stower Grange that ranks birds principally on their flying skill. Pigeons always ranked first—not only because of their speed, endurance, and navigation but because of their courage while flying home through the most trying conditions.

After falling into a silent reminiscence, Austerlitz reveals that in 1965, Gerald crashed his Cessna in the Alps—a day that marked the beginning of Austerlitz’s withdrawal from the world.

Pages 114-132 Analysis

These pages center largely on Austerlitz’s view that it is unnatural to govern the world according to the arbitrary construct of linear time. This view reflects both his historical awareness (people didn’t organize their lives around clock time until the Industrial Revolution) and his grief over his lost past. He speculates he’s avoided clocks his entire life out of hope of regaining this past, a hope “that I can turn back and go behind [time …], and there I shall find everything as it once was” (116).

This motif—that the past is still accessible in the present—also appears in Ashman’s story about reentering his childhood nursery. He recounted becoming enraged upon seeing his toy version of Noah’s Ark and the carved notches on his dresser, and firing his rifle at the clock tower. The symbolism is clear: Ashman was angry that time had passed, that even though a piece of his past was preserved in the nursery, everything else had been changed by time. Seeing the notches also evoked his unprocessed fury for that time, and he was angry that time hadn’t healed that childhood wound. The toy ark symbolizes this unfulfilled promise: What he may have then seen as a symbol of salvation—the ark that saves Noah from catastrophe—he now saw as a child’s false hope. His fortune had worsened and he could no longer afford to maintain his childhood home as anything more than a granary.

There is also a motif of a kind of synchronicity, in that the painter J. M. W. Turner visited and later painted the Mawddach Estuary at the same age Austerlitz was there for the Fitzpatricks’ funeral. In Austerlitz’s nonlinear conception of time, the fact of being able to reenter the past means that every moment exists simultaneously (116). This suggests he imagines Turner’s 1798 landscape painting was inspired by the 1957 funeral procession for the Fitzpatricks. Because Austerlitz recognizes his own life and experiences in Turner’s watercolor, it raises the question of whether Austerlitz is remembering the funeral procession itself or augmenting it with Turner’s image, just as Hilary argued historians do with history and preformed images.

Pigeons appear as a metaphor for Austerlitz’s journey to find his home—to uncover the mystery of his past. Austerlitz identifies with Gerald’s description of pigeons’ infallible homing ability, hoping that he, too, can have the courage to navigate home as pigeons do through “so menacing a void, their hearts surely almost breaking with fear in their presentiment of the vast distances they must cover, [as they] make straight for their place of origin” (129). Versions of this homing ability appear later in the novel as Austerlitz is inexplicably drawn to places that hide clues to his past.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By W.G. Sebald