logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Pat Conroy

Beach Music

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1995

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Potency of Generational Trauma

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death by suicide, and genocide.

Beach Music highlights the lasting mental and emotional effects of trauma. Specifically, the novel unpacks the way trauma can extend from one generation to the next.

The most profound example of generational trauma in the novel is that which Shyla inherits from her parents. Ruth and George Fox experienced profound suffering during World War II when they were subjected to the cruelty and violence of the Nazi regime. Ruth and George respond to their nightmarish experiences in different ways. Ruth shares her story and her ongoing anxiety with her daughter. Jack overhears Ruth’s endless warnings to Shyla, evidence of her internalized terror of danger and death: “Close that door when you talk to me […] or we’ll all be dead of pneumonia […] Go and wash your hands. Don’t play in the dirt anymore. God didn’t make you an ant […] Turn off that stove. Are you crazy or what?” (474). Jack recalls Shyla’s “small, fearful face” (474) in that moment and reflects on the deep fear and anxiety that Ruth instilled in her daughter. This is a darkness that Shyla is never able to shake. George, on the other hand, does not tell his story to anyone until he reveals it to Jack in Chapter 34. Instead, George turns inward, feeling irredeemable because of the guilt he feels over what he was forced to do. As a father, George is thus removed and harsh. Instead of speaking, he obsessively plays the piano and passes that obsession on to Shyla.

As Jack notes, “Neither of Shyla’s parents could leave the country of their hideous past” (475). Shyla’s eventual death by suicide reinforces that her parents’ trauma has passed on to her. Shyla’s final words refer to her mother’s story about the Lady of the Coins, and just before dying she gets a new tattoo—a duplicate of the number forcibly tattooed onto George (and all the other concentration camp victims) in Auschwitz. Jack reflects on that tattoo, thinking “The presence of that raw angry number was an eloquent annotation binding her to the great blood-letting of her people” (475). It isn’t only Shyla’s death that underscores her inherited trauma. Her friends suspect that she was inspired to join the antiwar movement by her parents’ memories of the Holocaust. As Radical Bob puts it, "To her, the Vietnamese were Jews. The Americans were the invading army, so they became Nazis in her mind. Every time I argued with Shyla about the war, she took me on a field trip to Auschwitz” (658). In detailing the experiences of the Foxes during the war, and then following the way their parenting styles reflect their scars, Conroy explores the lasting, intergenerational ripples of trauma.

Of course, the generational trauma of the Fox family extends past Shyla to her daughter Leah. Leah, still a young girl during the events of the novel, is confronted by the concepts of depression, suicide, and loss at an early age because of her mother’s trauma. She has also been kept from half of her heritage, as Jack, in a misguided and damaging attempt to protect her from her grandparents’ custody suit, does not teach her about her Jewish roots. The novel ends on an optimistic note that Leah will be well-cared for and will hopefully have the support she needs to process her loss and reclaim all aspects of her identity, but her mother’s suicide will certainly impact her for the rest of her life. Conroy contends that trauma has a long reach, and that it can impact the mental and emotional well-being of generations.

The Line Between Loyalty and Duty

In Beach Music, characters who are motivated most strongly by their sense of duty to their nation or their religion are contrasted with characters motivated by their sense of loving loyalty to the important people in their lives. Pat Conroy draws a distinction between duty and loyalty, contending that duty alone is not enough to lead people to make fulfilling decisions and arguing that what is moral does not always align with what is legal.

General Rembert Elliot’s story arc highlights the line between loyalty and duty. Throughout the novel, the general is motivated most strongly by his sense of duty to his country and to the US Marine Corps. He prioritizes this obligation over all other factors in his life. His desire to be the quintessential military leader, and to shape his son in that image, leads him to abuse and neglect his family. The general is unable to forgive or empathize with Jordan’s actions when Jordan blows up the plane, accidentally killing a Marine and his girlfriend; all General Elliot considers is his own duty to turn his son in for his crimes. He attempts to do so, leading law enforcement to Rome to trap Jordan. General Elliot’s actions contrast sharply with Celestine Elliot’s protection of their son. She is motivated by loyalty to her son and tries, with Jack’s help, to protect Jordan at all costs. General Elliot loses his job, his wife, and many years of a relationship with his son because he sees his civic duty as the most important motivator in his life. He and Jordan are reconciled only when the general acts out of fatherly loyalty, relocating to live near the prison where Jordan serves his sentence. The novel contends that duty is a cold emotion on its own; it must be joined by love or loyalty to lead to a sense of fulfillment.

Capers Middleton is another character who betrays loved ones out of a sense of duty to his nation. “I thought our country was in trouble,” he says (689), defending his actions. Capers betrays Shyla, Jack, and Jordan in college by pretending to be part of the antiwar movement and then testifying against his friends in court when their protests lead them to break the law. Capers’ betrayal splinters their friend group and sends Jordan down the path that leads to him blowing up the plane. Years later, at the mock trial at the Dock Street Theater, Capers expresses regret and sorrow for his actions: “I had no idea it would lead to all of this. It hurt people I thought the world of. It won’t let go of me” (708). Just as with General Elliot, Capers’s sense of duty prevents him from seeing the big picture or from considering the potential harm of his actions.

Forgiveness as Difficult but Necessary Work

The power of forgiveness is a central theme in Beach Music. Pat Conroy asserts that the process of forgiving oneself and others can be hard and painful, but that it is a necessary part of healing.

At the outset of the novel, Jack’s relationship with George Fox is fraught with anger and hatred on both sides. George Fox, for his part, hates Jack because Jack reminds him of the German soldiers who tortured him and his family in Poland. George is angry at Jack for marrying Shyla; George wanted Shyla to marry a Jewish man. Jack, on the other hand, resents George for the way he treated Shyla as a girl. Jack saw how Shyla was hurt by her father’s sternness and unrealistic expectations. Furthermore, Jack is deeply angry with George and Ruth for trying to take custody of Leah after Shyla’s death. It is this action that Jack struggles to forgive them for most. All this fury between Jack and George makes forgiveness a difficult prospect indeed. The author validates both characters’ experiences; they are both depicted as flawed but sympathetic characters, with understandable reasons for their actions. Pat Conroy does not imply that forgiveness is easy to reach, nor does he suggest that it is a given. Through relationships like Jack’s and George’s, the author acknowledges that true forgiveness is hard won.

The novel also contends that forgiveness, however difficult to achieve, is necessary if one desires to heal and move forward. For Jack and George, Leah’s happiness and wellbeing is a literal and immediate manifestation of the necessity of forgiveness. Both men want the best for Leah, so they realize that they will need to be in each other’s lives. At first, they settle for an uneasy truce, avoiding speaking with each other and spending as little time in the same room as possible. Despite their anger, however, both men desire a more lasting and a deeper relationship; they crave forgiveness and want the peace that will come with it. Ruth and George’s participation in Jack’s wedding in the epilogue symbolizes that forgiveness, and the rich future that it promises. The novel illustrates the healing power that is possible through the difficult act of forgiveness.

Jack’s character arc is also defined by his quest for self-forgiveness. He worries that he contributed to the depression that led Shyla to her death. In the early chapters of the novel, evidence of this worry is voiced by other characters, who use Jack’s guilt to hurt him. Mike, for example, says to Jack, “We may not live up to your high fucking standards, Jack, but none of our wives ever went up on the bridge. All of our girls are still walking around” (73-74). These cruel remarks indicate that Mike knows that Jack is still struggling to forgive himself. Jack’s journey toward self-forgiveness is a long one. Jack needs to have many conversations with people who loved and knew Shyla before he realizes that her depression didn’t have anything to do with him. Jack’s forgiveness arc is completed in the epilogue, when he shows Shyla’s letter to Ledare and both he and Ledare reflect on Shyla’s deep love for Jack. The hopeful ending to the novel indicates Jack’s healing spirit and the self-forgiveness that made it possible.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text