62 pages • 2 hours read
Ann PatchettA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: The novel recounts a hostage situation with its accompanying psychological stress. It also contains scenes of graphic violence. The term “terrorist” is used throughout to describe the group that takes the hostages, following the author’s lead. The novel invokes stereotypes about Indigenous peoples, and their role as terrorists here is one of these stereotypes. The novel also refers to sexual harassment.
While Roxanne Coss develops as a rounded character in her own right, she also functions as a symbol in the novel. Her celebrity and talent set her apart from the other characters; thus, she becomes the metaphorical vessel for the various desires and dreams, hopes and longings of hostage and terrorist alike. They all view her with awe, as if she were not of the material world: “No one could see her objectively anyway. Even those who saw her for the first time, before she had even opened her mouth to sing, found her radiant, as if her talent could not be contained in her voice and so poured like light through her skin” (32). She glows like a goddess.
Roxanne also stimulates a large amount of lustful longing in the men. Oscar, the contractor that the Vice President has befriended, decides he will declare his love for her before thinking better of it. In contrast, the Russian Fyodorov plucks up the courage to make his pronouncements of love, through an embarrassed Gen. The Vice President, too, gets caught up in the notion, thinking “At least she was not a tall woman. She was a pixie, a pocket Venus” (120). Again, Roxanne is compared to otherworldly creatures, faeries and goddesses; to the men, she is a fantastical entity, not a flesh-and-blood woman. This leads most of them to ignore her: “all the men in their desire to speak to her had decided to leave her alone as if it was some sort of respect, so alone she sat, hour after hour” (124). They are like schoolboys, too shy to approach the pretty girl. Only Mr. Hosokawa reaches out to her, and his gestures eventually generate actual love, rather than awestruck admiration. She is a kind of living embodiment of opera music: powerful, beautiful, and sensual at the same time. Her musical ability is often referred to in bodily terms, such as something to drink through one’s lips.
To the young terrorists, she embodies beauty and sophistication, and they all long to make love to her—though none of them dare act on this impulse. It is Cesar who will find a special place in her heart, through his heartfelt imitation of her singing. Even he harbors fantasies about her place in his life: “In the perfect world it would not be Carmen in this tree. It would be Roxanne Coss herself who had followed him up there. She would be touching his cheek [. . .]. They would sing together. The word for that was duet. They would travel all over the world” (271). Roxanne Coss will take Cesar under her tutelage and begin to train him, but “Roxanne Coss” will forever be the repository of his hopes and unfulfilled dreams. She is a symbol of beauty, although she in her actual self is a real woman with real thoughts and actions.
Time moves mysteriously within the confines of the Vice Presidential mansion. The hostages are accustomed to high-powered professional schedules, while the terrorists are used to military action. Here, however, in the midst of a stand-off, there is not much to do but wait: “Time could barely pull the second hand forward on the clock,” and it was “as if the world had become a giant train station in which everything was delayed until further notice. It was this absence of time that had everyone confused” (107). Their routines are disrupted, and this makes the men discombobulated and disconnected from the world outside the hostage crisis.
Mr. Hosokawa feels this slow crawl of time acutely, as a man who has spent his entire life diligently working and making little time for leisure: “All his life he had wanted more time to listen, and when finally there was time there was nothing to listen to, only the patter of voices he could not understand” (133). Of course, as more time passes, Roxanne will seek out an accompanist and request some sheet music, and Mr. Hosokawa will listen, enraptured, for as long as time will allow him. The terrorist Beatriz becomes so enamored with one of the soap operas on the television that the passage of time tortures her as well. Gen finally gives her his watch, and Mr. Hosokawa teaches her to tell time; she gets into the habit of checking it every three minutes. Her characteristic quality is impatience. When General Benjamin and Mr. Hosokawa play chess together, their moves are taken so slowly, it is “as if time had yet to be invented” (226). Inside the ad hoc and enclosed community that now resides in the mansion, time loses its meaning. Time is a construct, and as it disappears in this world, so, too, do other constructs disappear, such as class and cultural power constructs. Inside the mansion a genuine, construct-free and unified utopia is formed, a type of Eden.
Even Joachim Messner falls victim to this torpor; he is able to leave the mansion and return to the real world outside, but his efforts at negotiation have stalled. He knows that the situation will end as it always does, and he despairs of changing the outcome. Each day he arrives, knowing that everything “would all be the same” (235). It is akin to being stuck in a time loop; the characters in Bel Canto flounder their way through the endless days and repetitive activities only to find they are happy, they are in love. Mr. Hosokawa wishes, at one point, that “he could stop time” (291). For Messner, however, this feels like cruelty, because he knows what is coming: “Truly, time had stopped. He had always been here and he would always be here” (302). Alas, the terrorists’ time is up, and time lurches forward to make up for its absence: “Time, so long suspended, now came back with such a force that it overlapped and everything happened at once” (313). In a mere instant, it seems, all of the terrorists, along with Mr. Hosokawa, are gone. Once the government, the outside world, comes in, all of the constructs come in, too; the Indigenous terrorists are killed, and time seems to resume in an instant with all of them dead.
At the beginning of the takeover, the terrorists are barely distinguishable from one another, at least to the hostages; they are “little bandits” following three slightly older Generals (71). When they discuss their plans, “[t]heir voices [blur] together” (71), as do their identities. These young teenagers are interchangeable, with their skinny limbs and scary weapons. They are merely a terrifying mob. Still, on occasion, their actions begin to humanize them. When Father Arguedas goes over to the dying accompanist, the Generals do not stop him: “That was either the power of the Church or the power of the opera singer” (77). Though they wanted “to stop him, to slap him,” they resist the impulse, and the priest is able to administer last rites (77).
As time goes by, some of the younger terrorists take on individual identities, too, including Ishmael and Cesar: “They were just starting to become distinguishable, these boys” (95). As for the Generals, Benjamin becomes the most notable; his is marked by the inflamed shingles infection on his face, and the reader becomes privy to some of his back story: “Before his brother’s arrest, Benjamin had not been a general at all. He had taught grade school” (136). This surprising bit of information further humanizes the “terrorists;” Benjamin hopes to secure the release of his brother, who he believes is being held as a political prisoner. Tragically, after General Benjamin is killed in the government raid, his brother is executed in prison for being a co-conspirator.
Beatriz and Carmen are singled out among the terrorists, mostly for their gender but also for their specific roles. Carmen, of course, becomes Gen’s lover, so the reader follows some of her innermost thoughts about her love for the brilliant Japanese man. Her eagerness to become literate and her quickness in learning also serve to elicit the reader’s empathy. Beatriz, on the other hand, is sometimes impetuous and selfish. Still, as the other characters grow and change through the book, so does Beatriz. She retains Carmen’s confidence after discovering that Mr. Hosokawa was being escorted to Roxanne’s room. When Father Arguedas encourages her interest in confession, Beatriz admits to herself that she does not feel “very grown up” or “very wicked,” but she acquiesces anyway (246). The priest tries to nurture her nascent compassion.
Still, to the government soldiers who storm the mansion in the final chapter of the book, the terrorists appear to them as they appeared to the hostages at the beginning of the story: they are interchangeable, which unfortunately means that they are all, despite what the reader has learned about them as individuals, expendable. To the reader, they are their individual selves; to the government, however, they are a symbol or motif, simply “The Band of Terrorists.”
While the book is ostensibly about the hostile capture and restraint of 39 men and one woman, as the story unfurls, the differences between the hostages and the terrorists become increasingly blurry. The longer the two groups are housed together in the Vice President’s mansion, the more relaxed the rules become. The terrorists play chess with the hostages; the hostages form close relationships with some of the terrorists; they all go outside to engage in friendly sports and gardening. Roxanne Coss, with her commanding voice and celebrity, is never really considered a captive; rather, she is captivating.
From the first, the terrorists treat her differently. When she tries to protect her dead accompanist’s body, General Benjamin does not intervene: “He couldn’t strike her the way he should have, surely there would have been an insurrection in the living room and he wasn’t certain that the younger members of his army would not shoot in her defense” (85). She has already captivated the hearts of the young male terrorists, not to mention the hostages. It quickly becomes clear that any demands or requests Roxanne makes will be met. She is more in charge than the Generals, as Benjamin finally realizes: “He tried to make it sound like his decision, that he was the one in charge, but even he could see this was no longer true” (153).
As time in the mansion passes, the hostages begin to feel sympathy for the terrorists. This is partly because they appear to be so young: “The hostages stared at the terrorists, and the longer they looked, the younger the terrorists became. [. . .] They slept like teenagers” (110). That feeling turns into the kind of compassion that will drive the Vice President to offer to adopt the smallest of the boys, Ishmael. It is what will prompt Roxanne Coss to take Cesar under her wing, teaching him to sing opera.
By the end of the novel, the so-called captives do not even want to leave. They have been captivated not only by the opera singer herself—especially Mr. Hosokawa—but they have been ensnared in the utopian world that slowly evolves within the mansion. As Mr. Hosokawa realizes, “It even occurred to him that he might be able to escape now if he wanted to, simply walk down the front path to the gate at night and set himself free. He did not want to” (289). Ultimately, the tragedy is not in the taking of hostages; rather, it is in the loss of the terrorists, of this found family.
By Ann Patchett