logo

30 pages 1 hour read

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Cell One

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 2007

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Dangers of the Bandwagon Effect

Content Warning: This section of the guide discusses police violence and gang violence.

The bandwagon effect is a social phenomenon in which people adopt certain behaviors, mannerisms, and ideologies primarily because they are popular with other people. In “Cell One,” almost all characters engage in this conformist mode of behavior, often to the detriment of larger society. As such, Adichie uses the dangers of the bandwagon effect as a stark warning to readers. The limits between safe and dangerous forms of collective thinking are blurred, with tragic consequences for individuals such as Nnamabia, who ignorantly emulates popular behaviors.

Nnamabia’s inclination toward the bandwagon effect is the most obvious of all the characters, since he is the protagonist and observed the most closely by the narrator. “Cell One’s” initial robbery episode lays out the predisposition very clearly, with the narrator asserting that he stole the jewelry “because other sons of professors were doing it” (Paragraph 6). This character trait is taken to extreme lengths during the cult craze on campus when Nnamabia’s involvement cannot be confirmed but is highly suspected by his family. Adichie writes, “[c]ult boys were popular, and Nnamabia was very popular. Boys yelled out his nickname—‘The Funk!’—and shook his hand whenever he passed by, and girls, especially the popular ones, hugged him for too long when he said hello” (Paragraph 11). However, even though Nnamabia’s bandwagon tendencies are the most blatant in “Cell One,” he is also the only character who makes a conscious effort to reform himself, eventually confronting injustice in the prison when all the other prisoners laugh at it. This demonstrates the morality of jumping of foregoing bandwagon thinking. 

Despite being less scrutinized than Nnamabia, most other characters in the story are also guilty of bandwagon thinking and behavior. The narrator’s parents actually shift toward bandwagon ideology after Nnamabia is imprisoned out of fear that political speech will get them in trouble with the men who could kill their son. The narrator resentfully observes, “My father no longer gave a monologue… on how illiterate and corrupt the police were… My mother did not mumble that the policemen were symptoms of a larger malaise” (Paragraph 26). The collectivist complacency, born out of a sense of coercion and helplessness, has a sadder tone than Nnamabia’s swaggering quest for popularity. Nevertheless, it is evident that the parents adopt a collective mode of speech and behavior because the bandwagon is a safer space for them than individualism. This suggests that the bandwagon effect is a means to control and maintain homogeneity in a system, which underlines the bravery involved in foregoing bandwagon thinking.

In the end, Adichie portrays the bandwagon effect as a self-sustaining phenomenon by depicting how one character’s initial dangerous behavior forces other characters to also buy into the dangerous social environment. She also demonstrates that those who self-analyze are more likely to adjust their bandwagon mentality when confronted with it. Within the scheme of “Cell One,” Nnamabia must complete this process of self-analysis within the violent confines of his prison cell.

The Harms of Privilege-Fueled Apathy

In addition to engaging in collective thinking, the characters in “Cell One” consistently treat each other apathetically. This apathetic social environment is enabled and fueled by the characters’ various privileges which make them ignorant of the suffering of others. From the outset, the narrator is transparent about her family’s comfortable socioeconomic status as part of the academic elite. She sees the crimes of the boys around her as distasteful precisely because it is an affected performance of stereotypical poverty rather than an authentic response to their life experiences. One of her most cutting observations—“Boys who had grown up… attending the university staff primary school in polished brown sandals were now cutting through the mosquito netting of their neighbors’ windows […] and climbing in to steal TVs” (Paragraph 6)—points to the nonsensical nature of this criminality. Underlying the absurdity is a baseline apathy, both for the victims of their crimes and for the nature of criminality itself.

In the prison, this apathetic attitude is adopted by both prisoners and policemen, particularly toward the old man. During the incident which prompts Nnamabia’s defense of the man, he recalls, “[y]esterday, the police asked the old man if he wanted a free half bucket of water. He said yes. So they told him to take his clothes off and parade the corridor. Most of my cellmates were laughing” (Paragraph 67). Here, both the police and prisoners enjoy power and privilege that the old man does not; the police hold ultimate authority over the prison and therefore do not have to live fearfully, and the other prisoners (some of whom are other members of the educated elite) enjoy the privilege of not being victimized by the police to the same extent as the old man. This privilege allows everyone to ignore the horrific mistreatment of the old man, instead treating it as humorous in a chillingly apathetic moment.

Adichie presents Nnamabia’s journey away from apathy and toward empathy as the antidote to the social injustices occurring within the prison. Nnamabia is the only prisoner so moved by the old man’s plight that it spurs him into action, even at the risk of his own life. Although the entire prison is not reformed by this act of bravery (and it is unclear what happens to the old man), this narrative suggests that individual empathetic action can generate change. 

The Normalization of Violence Under Oppressive Systems

Horrific violence occurs throughout “Cell One,” and because of the dysfunctional social environment, characters respond to this violence with overarching detachment. This counterintuitive dynamic is partly a coping mechanism in response to the proliferation of violence, but it ultimately only facilitates violent norms. Adichie’s most notable novels from the early half of her career deal with violence in its various forms; Purple Hibiscus (2001) portrays domestic violence, and Half of a Yellow Sun (2007) is an account of the Biafran War. “Cell One” fits into these concerns, addressing gang violence and police violence as equivalent brutal systems that people learn to live under passively.

As audacious and performative people, the university cult boys enact the first form of systemic violence described in the story. Their reign of violent terror across campus quickly proves overwhelming for the rest of the student population. As the narrator observes, “[i]t was so abnormal that it became normal” (Paragraph 10), suggesting that normalization is the only possible coping mechanism in response to the prolific level of murder occurring around her. However, while the rest of the community cowers in complacence, the cult boys become emboldened; the shooting that results in Nnamabia’s arrest takes place in broad daylight during a school day. When a curfew is imposed, the narrator recalls, “[t]his did not make much sense to me, since the shooting had happened in the sparkling daylight” (Paragraph 14). By this point, she has been so inundated with deadly violence in her daily life that she does not see the utility of basic campus safety measures anymore. The audacity of the cults proves to be their downfall, however, because the daytime shooting is a step too far for the police, who begin rounding up all the suspicious boys in response.

The key difference between the system of police violence and the system of cult violence in “Cell One” is that the police carry out their attacks within the closed off space of the prison and under the guise of the law. In this sense, police violence is normalized because it is largely invisible to the public and a way of life for the prisoners themselves. This insidious framework is apparent in minute details throughout the story: the narrator calls Enugu “anonymous” (Paragraph 15), and she notices that the second prison they take Nnamabia to was “in a godforsaken part of town, and there was no sign that said ‘Police Station’” (Paragraph 62). However, despite this different façade from the cult violence, Adichie illustrates an undeniable affinity between the two, most obvious when Nnamabia gleefully endorses the system of violence and corruption at the beginning of his imprisonment. Adichie therefore challenges the reader to recognize that systemic violence can have many forms but that ultimately these forms embolden and normalize one another. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text