69 pages • 2 hours read
Heather Cox RichardsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: The guide and source text discuss hate speech, racism, enslavement, racial and gender prejudice, genocide and displacement of Indigenous Americans, anti-Black violence, and systemic inequalities through American history. To refer to the collective of Americans who are not of European descent, Heather Cox Richardson uses the phrase “people of color,” which this guide preserves. Both the guide and the source text are specific about race and ethnicity where applicable.
Richardson introduces her central thesis by contextualizing Adolf Hitler’s rise to power as an elected individual. Hitler “harnessed societal instability into [his] own service” using “language and false history” (10). Authoritarianism rises when a “strongman” rallies support of people who feel disenfranchised by creating a fiction that “enemies have cheated them of power” (10). The resulting mistreatment of perceived enemies engrains their beliefs, as admitting this mistake and mistreatment would mean “that they, not their enemies, are evil” (10).
Richardson proposes that, in the global rise of fascist authoritarianism around the events of World War II, America didn’t succumb not because of any inherent resistance to fascism, but because of the historic “insistence” of “minorities and women” that all people should be created equal (12). Despite this, the nation’s “Founders” embraced systems of inequality, and through the Civil War and Civil Rights era through the election of Donald Trump, some political factions insisted that expanding rights and freedoms were “an attempt to replace white men with minorities and women” (13).
Richardson ends her foreword by saying that her book attempts to both expose the trajectory of the authoritarian “war on democracy” and to demonstrate the perseverance of democracy despite this (15).
Richardson traces the concept of 20th-century conservatism. Amid the Great Depression, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s carefully chosen female secretary of labor, Francis Perkins, believed that the government had a responsibility to protect workers. Congress, FDR, and Perkins worked to regulate the stock market, instate maximum work hours and a minimum wage, prohibit child labor, guarantee the right to unionize, raise taxes on the wealthy, provide jobs programs for unemployed, invest in infrastructure, and create a social safety net that included the Social Security Act. These incentives “imperfectly” included women and Black Americans, which earned the ire of Southern Democrats and a “rump group” of Republicans, who believed the New Deal threatened “traditional values.” In 1937, this coalition leaked a “Conservative Manifesto” whose appeal to states’ rights veiled southern states’ desire to keep their “racial codes.” Though Congress largely ignored it, “whites-only citizens’ organizations and chambers of commerce” and “business and manufacturing organizations” republished millions of copies (19-20). This document still has influence on 21st-century conservatives.
The historical meaning of “conservatism” emerged from Anglo-Irish statesman Edmund Burke during the French Revolution, who wanted to “make changes slowly according to facts on the ground” (20), rather than with ideology. The word was rarely used in the United States until the 1800s, when abolitionist Joseph Medill accused anti-abolitionists of falsely representing history, as the Declaration of Independence did not address “free white men” but “ALL men” (22). Republicans began to claim abolition as a conservative stance that held to the nation’s original principles. Lincoln’s “conservative” government created public universities, guaranteed access to resources for lower classes, invested in railroad infrastructure, and ended Black enslavement “except as punishment for a crime” (23): Many of these same programs underwrote the New Deal.
After the United States’ entry into World War II, the movement of Americans who embraced fascism as a way of maintaining “traditional” power structures collapsed, as FDR publicly declared a defense of democracy in the face of Mussolini’s and Hitler’s fascist states. Democratic, Allied victory in WWII led to a liberal consensus: bipartisan support of the New Deal’s business regulations, social safety net, and infrastructure investment. The war also highlighted disparities and systemic racism in the United States. Traditional Southern Democrats prevented FDR and his successor, Harry S Truman, from passing meaningful civil rights legislation. After 1954’s Brown v. Board of Education was passed under a Republican Supreme Court justice, Republican Arthur Larson stated that “modern Democratic policies” and the “traditional Republicanism” of the Lincoln era united as “Modern Republicanism” whose government acted to meet the needs of its citizens (28).
Richardson tells the anecdote of Isaac Woodard, a Black WWII veteran who was beaten and blinded by a local police chief. In 1946, a local judge and the South Carolina government refused to charge the chief. The NAACP publicized the story, catching the attention of actor and radio host Orson Welles, who called out the South Carolina government daily on his radio show until President Truman agreed to meet with the NAACP. Though the Department of Justice indicted the chief, an all-white jury immediately acquitted him. Truman put together the President’s Committee on Civil Rights to address racial inequity. Richardson then tells the story of Felix Longoria, a Mexican American who died in 1945 while fighting in the Philippines. When his body was returned to his widow four years later, she was refused a wake on the grounds that “the whites won’t like it” (32). A local Texas doctor, Héctor P. García, took up the cause and caught the attention of Texas senator Lyndon B. Johnson, who arranged for Longoria to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery, which sits on the site of Confederate general Robert E. Lee’s plantation. These two stories show instances in which federal action protected American citizens.
Truman and Johnson had difficulty working against segregationist southern Democrats, dubbed “Dixiecrats.” In 1954, President Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren as a Supreme Court justice, and he ruled in favor of the case of NAACP lawyer Thurgood Marshall, unanimously agreeing that racial discrimination was unconstitutional.
Amid “white reactionary violence” (34), a young boy named Emmett Till was murdered. Despite his open-casket funeral, his murderers were acquitted by an all-white jury, even though they “admitted their guilt and sold the story of the murder to Look magazine for cash” (34). The pressure around racial equity built through the Montgomery Bus Boycotts, the bombing of Ralph Abernathy and Martin Luther King Jr.’s homes, and the violence against the Little Rock Nine. In 1957, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act.
After WWII, the liberal consensus linked civil rights and economic welfare. This enabled opponents to create a false history that claimed that “the federal government was misusing tax dollars from hardworking white men to promote civil rights for undeserving Black people” (36). After racial discrimination against voters became unconstitutional, Southern states changed their argument to an economic one, saying that poor Black voters would vote for leaders who promised public improvements that white taxes would pay for. Northern Republicans who previously supported Black rights “began to look the other way” toward anti-Black voting disenfranchisement (39).
In the 1950s, William F. Buckey Jr. and L. Brent Bozell Jr. imagined the world was divided into “Christians and communists” (40). On the latter side were “liberals”: people of any party who believed in government regulation, civil rights, or “fact-based argument” (40). On the former side were “Movement Conservatives” who supported “traditional family structures and social hierarchies that put men in charge of their families the same way that God oversaw the world” (41). While Americans initially rejected Movement Conservatism based on the success of the New Deal, civil rights in the 1950s resurrected this movement in the form of the television cowboy on shows like Bonanza, a character trope conservative lawmakers channeled to argue against federal civil rights laws.
Movement Conservatives associated the civil rights of Black Americans with communism through the Kennedy presidency. Meanwhile, Democratic support for Black voting rights crystallized in 1965 after the “Bloody Sunday” attack on civil rights protestors in Selma, Alabama. On the outs of their previous party, Southern “Dixiecrats” rallied behind Richard M. Nixon, who realized he could appeal to disillusioned segregationist Democrats. Nixon’s “southern strategy” was a key turning point for the Republican Party’s stance on race, as civil rights became weaponized by Republican politicians to convince the coalitions that additional rights for fellow citizens was a direct threat to their own livelihoods.
Throughout the first half of Part 1, Richardson shares the stories of both popular and lesser-known political figures and explains how these stories both affect and represent national trends in political ideology and governance. Unlike history textbooks, which usually detail historical events chronologically, Richardson’s storytelling method skips through chronology, demonstrating how political phenomena are intertwined with legacies and ideologies that came before them. This is a central feature of Richardson’s argument, as it is important to her later argument that the authoritarianism embodied by Donald Trump was not his invention, but rather a symptom of The Throughline of Authoritarian Sentiment in US History.
Richardson discusses Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Lincoln to explain how seemingly familiar words like “conservative,” “liberal,” “Democrat,” and “Republican” shifted between the Civil War and Civil Rights era. She briefly addresses The Use of False History to Manipulate Ideology by discussing the original definition of conservatism. In its original form during the French Revolution, conservatism wanted to use “facts on the ground” to make political change (20), rather than religious or ideological beliefs. Richardson distinguishes this from American conservatism by introducing the term “Movement Conservatism.” This ideology-based conservatism appealed to wealthy pro-commercialization and pro-industrialization Republicans as well as Southern Democrats who supported segregation. Movement Conservatism purposefully conflated social movements, including the Civil Rights Movement, with communism in order to use fear tactics to radicalize people against civil rights.
Another common word Richardson provides a nuanced definition for is “liberalism,” through her discussion of the liberal consensus. In its original form in the Lincoln and FDR eras, the liberal consensus described a wide agreement to have a government whose actions met the needs of its citizens. In the liberal consensus, economy equality was paired with racial equality and the move “to address police brutality, end lynching, protect voting—including for Indigenous Americans—and promote equal rights, accounting for the incarceration of Japanese Americans as well as discrimination against Black Americans” (30), which were all considered inalienable principles of freedom the government needed to uphold. However, this linking enabled Movement Conservatives to attack the liberal consensus as “misusing” national resources for “undeserving” demographics. Richardson’s detailed contextualization of words frequently used in politics provides a broader history of how these words have morphed as beliefs and cultural climates change. Her discussion of the evolution of the words “conservative” and “liberal” to opposing politicized descriptors allows Richardson to use the next section of the book to describe how deep political and ideological divides and manipulations of historical fact set the stage for authoritarianism in the United States.
American Literature
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Political Science Texts
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection