66 pages • 2 hours read
John SteinbeckA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Steinbeck proposes that the individual is more important than the collective. The narrator states this explicitly in criticizing the industrial boom of the 19th century for creating a norm of valuing mass production. Creativity, says the narrator, can come only from the individual mind—and creativity is essential.
The novel’s character arcs demonstrate the importance of the individual over the collective. Cal must learn how to reckon with himself first, forgoing his expectations of love from his father or brother. Lee remains steadfast in his convictions and preaches that loneliness is precious. Charles and Cathy are extreme examples in that they function well on their own. Cathy wants total freedom, which requires that she remain solitary. Although she isn’t the ideal moral example, she has figured out the power of relying on oneself. Even Adam and Aron embody this in their own way: They’re selfish because they believe their worldviews and interpretations are the most important, and they think of the world around them only in terms of their convictions—whether those ideals are shallow or deep doesn’t matter. Many of the novel’s characters find themselves ruthlessly and painfully navigating human relationships. Although Steinbeck doesn’t want people to stop connecting with each other, the characters’ inner conflicts demonstrate that to first acknowledge your own responsibility and worth is paramount in achieving happiness, success, or peace of mind.
This theme is quintessentially American. Other cultures emphasize the importance of the community over the individual, but the US takes the opposite approach. In part, this attitude derives from the country’s sheer size. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, the US was still expanding. Families like the Hamiltons and Trasks had to build towns and cultures. To be a farmer on a frontier is a difficult and thankless life, so individualization is crucial. This philosophy of individual before collective ties into contemporary American discussions on issues such as welfare. The balance between helping yourself and being helped by others is tricky. Aron, for example, needs others to take care of him, which leaves him unable to figure out many life challenges on his own. However, Cal has no choice but to embrace his individuality, especially because he fears he doesn’t have it at all. He worries that he carries Cathy’s blood, and he constantly tries to imitate Aron to be welcomed and loved. Trying to win over the collective group has never worked for Cal, so his character arc depends on embracing his individuality.
Timshel, Hebrew for “thou mayest,” is a concept that follows the narrative threads of each character in the novel. Lee analyzes timshel as confirmation that humans can choose bad or choose good. Choice and free will are of paramount importance in East of Eden.
The narrator declares that the only real story that will continue to inspire humans is the struggle between good and evil. Intrinsic in this conflict is the question of choice—of whether humans can exert free will or are all passive victims of circumstance, genetic codes, and God. Timshel distinguishes characters who actively engage with the world from those who don’t. Aron and Adam, for example, allow things to happen to them. They aren’t proactive; instead, they rely on their goodness to secure allies to help tackle challenges. Cal and Lee, conversely, have no choice but to assert free will whenever they can. For Lee, timshel is important philosophically and practically, as it helps him assert his identity free of racial stereotypes and xenophobia. No matter how society tries to dehumanize him, Lee embraces life with joy and empowerment. For Cal, timshel is important because it’s his only tool for managing resentment, deep hurt, and vitriolic anger.
This theme is notable for its connection to religion. A commonly held Judeo-Christian belief is that God is all-knowing and has a plan for all people, precluding free will. Nevertheless, Steinbeck isn’t necessarily questioning religious doctrine when he weaves in the concept of timshel, because Lee found the word in the Bible. Through Lee, Steinbeck posits that asserting one’s free will is difficult. Thus, Steinbeck may be implying that people have misinterpreted the Bible because putting one’s fate in the hands of another entity is easier.
The East of Eden narrator (a thinly disguised John Steinbeck) declares that the most classic story of humankind is the battle between good and evil. While many ways to be good and bad exist, Steinbeck’s main point is that every human (except someone psychopathically evil, like Cathy) has both good and bad in them. If timshel truly exists, and if people can be honest with themselves and the world around them, they can choose between good and evil. The measure of a human lies in the ability to make amends with one’s good and bad sides.
Because everyone has a bad side, each person can make mistakes that hurt others. Even the novel’s “good” characters hurt others. The story characterizes Adam as good, yet he withholds emotionally from his motherless sons. Aron is good yet naive, and his foolishness negatively affects his brother and Abra. Lee is certainly good but acknowledges that he could do harm if he wanted to. Samuel Hamilton is good yet lackadaisical and causes his wife stress. A key difference between “good” characters like Adam and “bad” ones like his brother, Charles, is that the good characters seem to lack self-awareness, while the bad ones are aware of their flaws—and all except Cathy work to hold those flaws at bay. Charles is “bad” yet generous. He sends Adam money to help him get home after many years away, and he toils on the land to make a farm that his community can be proud of. Cal is “bad” but works hard to provide money for his family, extends genuine love and care to Aron, and accepts people for who they are. Both Charles and Cal love their fathers despite their flaws, while the “good” characters have difficulty loving flawed people.
By John Steinbeck
American Literature
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Historical Fiction
View Collection
Nobel Laureates in Literature
View Collection
Realistic Fiction (High School)
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection