52 pages • 1 hour read
John VaillantA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The official name of the May 2016 wildfire that decimated Fort McMurray is MWF-009 (McMurray Wildfire 009) since it was the district’s ninth major wildfire that year. Firefighters soon realized that this fire was different. Growing exponentially across thousands of acres, it steadily moved toward town. Mayor Melissa Blake announced a voluntary evacuation at 5:30 pm on May 1 but assured citizens that firefighters were creating firebreaks, or a “dirt moat” around the city, and doing everything possible to contain it, noting that the weather could make the firefight more challenging. High temperatures can create stronger winds, thus spreading fire more rapidly, and the area’s unseasonably warm weather encouraged the fire. By Mayor Blake’s side were Bernie Schmitte (the regional manager of the Wildfire Division of Alberta’s Ministry of Forestry and Agriculture) and Darby Allen (the municipal fire chief). They told the press and the citizens that while the fire was large and spreading quickly, the firefighters would likely keep it from reaching town. They exuded calm and confidence, which may have contributed to people’s lack of concern about the fire until it literally reached their doorsteps.
However, citizens of the nearby small town Slave Lake were more apprehensive. In 2011, a wildfire “supercharged” by high winds burned down more than a third of the town. Jamie and Ryan Coutts, a father-son firefighting duo with the Slave Lake Fire Department, recalled that climate change had elevated temperatures, increasing winds, which blew embers over the firebreak, creating spot fires throughout the town. The Coutts knew that traditional firefighting methods, no matter how labor intensive and skillful, were no longer adequate in this new “fire weather.” Although Slave Lake’s fire department had become passionate advocates for increased fire safety, Fort MacMurray’s fire department did not match their concern. Slave Lake was a relatively poor town, while Fort MacMurray was rich, home to multi-billion-dollar oil operations. They believed that their infrastructure could handle the wildfire. The Coutts warned them not to rely on traditional methods, advising them to adopt a “lean, agile, quasi-guerrilla” form of firefighting that involved strategizing from scratch based on the fire’s behavior, not on how the fire should behave according to past data (83).
On the morning of May 2, Shandra Linder was still unconcerned about the fire looming on the horizon. Her attitude reflected the general feeling in town: The fire seemed ominous but ultimately was not a significant threat. Meanwhile, Blake, Schmitte, and Allen held another press conference. They continued to downplay the threat, fearing the consequences of widespread panic, though Schmitte and Allen both knew at this point that wind-propelled embers from the fire would certainly fly over the firebreak and start fires in town. They counseled caution, noting that the temperature was almost 30°F higher than the average high for that time of year and that the humidity level was only 15%, much drier than usual. Climate change had exacerbated an already risky time of year.
Schmitte privately recalled the Chisholm fire, a 2001 wildfire that achieved “legendary status.” In late May, a senior wildfire expert with the Alberta government received a phone call from Washington, DC. They had detected a plume of smoke so huge that it rose into the stratosphere over Alberta, over 45,000 feet. This type of smoke had previously been seen only during volcanic eruptions. The Chisholm fire “set a terrifying new standard for fire on Earth” (90). Ignited by a spark from a freight train and aided by warming temperatures, the Chisholm fire was at least 20 times as intense as a normal wildfire, and some likened its sudden devastation to a series of bombs. The energy that the firestorm released at its seven-hour peak was later calculated as equivalent to 17 one-megaton hydrogen bombs, or about “four Hiroshima bombs per minute” (92). It represented a terrifying development in fire’s capability. Schmitte kept that in mind while addressing the public but considered a catastrophe a distant possibility given the firefighters’ tireless work. A fire had never necessitated a full town evacuation, and no one expected that the coming hours might require one. However, given rising temperatures due to climate change, this expectation was no longer realistic.
The text notes that “[a] fire in the boreal is as certain as death” (98): Forest fires occur several times a year in any given region, and the natural fire cycle is vital to the boreal trees. Several types of trees cannot reproduce unless the extreme heat of fire cracks their seed pods. Thus, human settlements in the boreal forest are especially vulnerable to fire despite proximity to water. In addition, oil processing plants are uniquely flammable, and a constant air system from the Arctic north keeps the air dry. Up until 2016, Fort McMurray was extremely lucky, managing to fight back all the blazes that had reached the settlement. However, due to climate change exacerbating the heat and dryness, circumventing this fire by normal means was impossible. Partly due to Fort McMurray’s luck in the past and partly because officials downplayed the situation to keep people calm, the town lacked a sense of urgency about the fire.
Schmitte, on a radio show at noon on May 3, commented in real time, on air, about worrying signs that the fire was surpassing predictions. During the show, he observed the fire’s “crossover,” when ambient temperature exceeds relative humidity, such that the environment no longer tamps down a fire but instead feeds it. After crossover, a fire is “set free” to rise in temperature, in turn creating stronger wind, which compounds the heat, providing more oxygen to the fire and allowing it to grow even more. Despite observing the crossover, however, Schmitte advised citizens to “carry on their normal day” (107), believing that even though the fire was far exceeding their predictions, it wouldn’t jump the firebreaks.
Shandra Linder, while driving to a meeting, spotted a tower of black smoke with streaks of red. Confused, she pulled over, believing that the cloud’s size meant that it was much closer than she expected. Seeing that the cloud was so massive that it took over the sky, Linder realized that the fire was a much bigger threat than officials had indicated.
Most natural disasters are limited to a specific area, like tsunamis on coasts, earthquakes on fault lines, or floods near rivers. However, “fire can occur anywhere there’s fuel” (113), which includes virtually all material except rock, water, metal, and dirt. Consequently, human settlements are uniquely vulnerable to fire, and it can overtake buildings quickly and unpredictably.
In Fort McMurray, the municipal firefighters mostly responded to motor vehicle accidents; the town often had fewer than five house fires per year. These firefighters lacked the experience to comprehend the danger of the looming fire. Slave Lake firefighters Jamie and Ryan Coutts arrived in Fort McMurray with extra equipment. Once they saw the fire, they informed the city’s fire captain that losing part of Fort McMurray that day was unavoidable. This warning galvanized Darby Allen, the wildfire chief, whom the Coutts urged to “do what’s right for the people” (117). Evacuation became increasingly certain. However, the logistics of evacuating an entire town are daunting even in ideal conditions, so officials argued about how to handle it. The oil companies Suncor and Syncrude were unwilling to shut down their operations since even a day’s delay could cause their stock prices to plummet. However, at this point, the fire was about to overrun the Abasand and Beacon Hill neighborhoods, so Darby Allen, at the Couttses’ urging, realized that he needed to follow his gut.
At this point, the fire was so hot that even water-retaining trees like aspen and poplar essentially vaporized as the flames reached them. This effect was incomprehensible to the firefighters, who realized that the fire posed a grave threat to the town. At 2:05 pm on May 3, officials gave the first evacuation orders. Families quickly packed essentials and prepared to leave but did not understand the danger until the “fire was breaking over Beacon Hill like a wave” (127). Still, some locked their doors, not believing that their homes could burn down.
People drove through every available area, including sports fields and parks, to escape burning streets. The only exits from the city were highways, however, and soon traffic forced people to inch down the road, packed tightly as everyone tried to escape. They were courteous and helpful to one another despite the dangerous circumstances. Quickly, cars became unexpected sanctuaries from the flames, protecting their occupants from deadly heat. Families contemplated escape strategies should their cars burst into flame.
Chief Troy Palmer, an off-duty firefighter called in to help fight the fires, made his way to the fire station nearest to the burning neighborhoods but, predictably, got stuck in traffic. On the way, he witnessed the entire southern hillside of Fort McMurray on fire, an unimaginably huge spread of flame. When he joined his fellow firefighters, they realized that the calm and orderly methods they were trained to follow were useless in this catastrophe. Instead, they reverted to a military-style response, relying on their captains to give orders and then improvising to carry them out. Palmer was assigned to take a truck to a nearby station and grab all the gear he could find since many off-duty firefighters showed up wearing civilian clothes. On the way, he “felt disoriented” since so many familiar landmarks had been completely incinerated.
Wildland and urban firefighters have very different tasks and thus use different strategies. However, wildfires sometimes collide with urban fires, forcing firefighters to adopt new strategies on the fly. This collision zone is called the “wildland-urban interface” (140). Many people like to live in a wildland-urban interface zone since access to human community and nature feels like the best of both worlds. However, human homes in the forest provide a feast of perfect fuel for fires. Houses before the 1900s were built in open fields and had tin or slate roofs to prevent fires, but rapidly constructed developments in the last century largely abandoned fire prevention as a priority, and thus human homes are ideal fuel. Palmer and his fellow firefighters quickly realized that they could not beat back the fire and instead turned their efforts toward evacuating stragglers.
The first half of Part 2 further explores the interplay of environmental, social, and industrial factors in creating and feeding the Fort McMurray wildfire, thematically touching on The Role of Human Activity in Natural Disasters. The text repeatedly underscores how human activities contribute to causing (and worsening the severity of) natural disasters as well as human vulnerability to them. The initial response of Fort McMurray authorities and citizens to the wildfire, marked by confidence in firefighting capabilities and infrastructure, illustrates the danger of underestimating nature’s power. Mayor Blake’s reassurances, coupled with the calm demeanor of Bernie Schmitte and Darby Allen, contributed to widespread lack of concern, highlighting a collective hubris about an event that ultimately had catastrophic consequences. This confidence starkly contrasted with the concern of the Slave Lake firefighters, who had previously faced a similarly devastating fire and thus advised against a traditional mindset.
In addition, the text introduces The Impact of Climate Change on Human Communities as a theme, linking the increasing severity of wildfires to climate change and emphasizing how elevated temperatures and altered weather patterns exacerbate fire risks for human communities. The mention of unseasonably warm weather and low humidity as key factors in the wildfire’s rapid spread poignantly alludes to the broader environmental crisis. In addition, the text illustrates the paradoxical relationship between the oil industry and climate change since the industry most directly contributing to global warming ironically became its victim. The text notes that another factor in protecting human communities is technology to predict and combat natural disasters. Despite advanced fire prediction models, the Fort McMurray firefighters relied on outdated methods and data, which proved inadequate to predict the wildfire’s behavior.
The response of the Fort McMurray community during the evacuation introduces the theme of Resilience and Creativity in the Face of Disaster. Despite the chaos and imminent danger, citizens exhibited remarkable composure and mutual support. The text captures their resilience through stories of families preparing to flee, firefighters like Chief Troy Palmer stepping up despite overwhelming odds, and the overall sense of unity in facing the disaster.
Irony continues to permeate the text, particularly in the contrast between the perceived safety of modern infrastructure and humans’ ultimate helplessness in confronting nature’s fury. Irony is likewise evident in the refusal of oil company officials to shut down plant operations, citing how any disruption is prohibitively costly to stockholders, despite the reality that plant operations help create ideal conditions for a raging wildfire, increasing the potential for the far more costly loss of human life and devastating environmental impact. In addition, the text again uses personification to describe the wildfire, depicting it as a living entity with a will of its own, creating a sense of an unstoppable, malevolent force, and characterizing the wind as a “generous host” with its hand on the fire’s back, urging it to feast upon everything available. The description of the fire “breaking over Beacon Hill like a wave” uses a simile to imbue the disaster with an almost apocalyptic character (127). These literary devices amplify the perceived threat and urgency, painting the fire as an adversary rather than a natural occurrence. Fire is a potent symbol throughout the chapters, representing both destruction and a natural cycle disrupted by human interference. The historical references to past wildfires, like the Chisholm fire, symbolize a growing trend of increasingly severe natural disasters, underscoring the theme of climate change and its long-term implications. Thus, the book not only chronicles the event but also offers critical insights into broader environmental and social dynamics, urging a reconsideration of humanity’s relationship with nature and the need for creative, adaptive, forward-thinking strategies.
By John Vaillant
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Climate Change Reads
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Globalization
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection