54 pages • 1 hour read
Edwin A. AbbottA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The novel uses the motif of interiority and exteriority to develop its discussions of scientific exploration and the subjective nature of perception. One way it does this is by using diagrams to depict the inside of Flatland dwellings in highly detailed ways. For example, in the diagram of The Square’s home as he sees it from Spaceland, not only are all the rooms visible and labeled, but so are the positions of his wife and two policemen standing outside (65). This concern with how structures are built and how people interact with those structures speaks to a larger concern with the relationship between perspective and perception. Again and again throughout the book, what characters are capable of seeing depends on where they stand. The Square, for example, becomes obsessed with the fact that from Space, he can see inside every building in Flatland, and indeed, inside every inhabitant’s body. This newfound vision raises new questions about scientific inquiry as it relates to concerns about privacy and bodily autonomy, as the Square later begs the Sphere to let him see inside the latter’s body too, expressing a particular interest in viewing the Sphere’s internal organs. The Sphere’s refusal to open himself up for viewing speaks to an anxiety about the effects that outside observation might have on the integrity of individual bodies. In other words, the text implies that scientific exploration is not always justified in its desire to violate the boundaries between interior and exterior.
Throughout the novel, color symbolizes the dream of liberation shared by members of marginalized groups, embodying the power that these groups can gain when they begin to see what is possible. In his description of the Colour Revolt and the arguments about the Universal Colour Bill, the Square emphasizes the way something as simple as color changed the Flatlanders’ perceptions of themselves and of each other. For example, if women had been required to be painted the same colors as priests—as was proposed in the bill—the women could have gained enormous social power: “At home they might hear political and ecclesiastical secrets intended not for them but for their husbands and brothers, and might even issue commands in the name of a priestly Circle” (30). The women initially support the bill after realizing that this is, in fact, something they want. The influence of color is so strong that, even after the movement for liberation has been crushed, the use of color remains completely banned in Flatland: Even “the utterance of any word denoting Color” carries with it a severe penalty (34). Ultimately, color symbolizes something small and simple that embodies the potential for revolutionary change on a massive scale and thus threatens the status quo by its very existence.
Analogies not only function as rhetorical tools throughout the novel, but also work to support the theme of The Unreliable Nature of Knowledge. An analogy, or a comparison between two things for the purposes of explanation or clarification, is meant to make concepts easier to grasp, but when characters in Flatland use analogies, the comparisons often fall apart or make the concept in question more confusing. The Sphere uses “the method of Analogy” in an attempt to convince the Square that three dimensions exist, but the Square becomes too overwhelmed by the implications of the analogies, declares that the Sphere is a monster, and tries to kill him (60, 62). Later in the text, The Square uses “the Argument from Analogy of Figures” to convince the Sphere that dimensions beyond the third might exist, but this time, the Sphere becomes angry and throws the Square back to Flatland (72). Logically, both instances of argument by analogy make sense, but these characters cannot deal with the ultimate conclusions and have emotional breakdowns. This pattern suggests that knowledge and rationality are not always useful, either in scientific exploration or in rhetoric.
British Literature
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Feminist Reads
View Collection
Nature Versus Nurture
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Satire
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Victorian Literature
View Collection
Victorian Literature / Period
View Collection