Framed: Astonishing True Stories of Wrongful Convictions

How does the cultural and historical context of the cases discussed in Framed influence the public’s and the legal system’s responses to wrongful convictions? In what ways does this context nuance the text’s thematic exploration of The Need for Advocacy and Reform?

Examine the role of systemic bias, both implicit and explicit, in the convictions described in the book. How do these biases perpetuate injustice? Cite specific examples from the text to support your argument.

How do the authors criticize the role of forensic science in criminal trials, and what broader implications does this have for evidentiary standards?

Analyze the interplay between institutional authority and individual advocacy as depicted in Framed. What does this dynamic reveal about pathways to justice?

Discuss the ethical responsibilities of prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges as presented in Framed. How does the book challenge or reaffirm traditional views of these roles?

In what ways does Framed engage with the concept of moral outrage, and how is this used to inspire calls for reform?

Analyze the authors’ critique of capital punishment through the lens of specific cases. How do they frame the death penalty as a moral and procedural issue?

How does Framed challenge readers to reconsider the reliability of eyewitness testimony and confessions as evidence in criminal trials? How does their critique of evidence reinforce their thematic interest in Systemic Flaws in the Criminal Justice System?