41 pages • 1 hour read
Ira BerlinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Berlin continually expresses the agency and autonomy of slaves alongside the violent and enduring constraints that kept slavery in place. What are some of the key strategies (language, images, example selection, etc.) that Berlin employs to balance these histories of oppression and opportunity? What are some of the potential drawbacks and implications of overemphasizing either the perils or the possibilities that slaves faced throughout American history, rather than balancing the two?
Berlin’s first and second chapters cover an expanse of time before the United States existed (before the American Revolution). What key elements of the history of slavery would be invisible if Berlin (or any other author) began an analysis of American slavery in the 1760s?
Which generation of slaves discussed in the monograph witnessed the largest degree of change throughout their existence? Think carefully about definitions and conditions of slavery and freedom as you make your selection.
Discuss the ways that Christianity permeated slave communities in each of the generations of captivity that Berlin outlines. Why did slaves occasionally resist the Christian faith? Why, at other times, did they adopt it?
What were the most catalyzing events in the history of American slavery (including events that predated the American Revolution but took place on lands that became the United States)? Which catalyzing event disrupted and worsened slaves’ lives the most? Which catalyzing event most obviously benefitted American slaves by presenting new possibilities? Be sure to reference specific geographies in your answer to provide proper context.
Historians of slavery must contend with a lack of written, archival sources that convey individual slaves’ perspectives. What historical conditions account for this absence of traditional archival material, and in what ways does Ira Berlin attempt to circumvent the problem?
The history of slavery created the categories of blackness and whiteness in American society. Though the book is primarily about slaves and the historical black community, which moments in the development of the institution of slavery most profoundly constructed the category of whiteness? What did whiteness come to represent in these moments?
In simplified accounts of the Antebellum period, authors and commentators tend to describe the North as the land of freedom and the South as the land of slavery. In what specific ways does Berlin complicate this binary? In your answer, offer specific definitions of “slavery” and “freedom” that illustrate the complexity of the history.
Berlin cites both major breakthroughs for slaves and free people of color and also enduring, structural obstacles to obtaining freedom and equality that remained even after emancipation. Would you describe Berlin’s telling of history as primarily optimistic, pessimistic, or somewhere in between? What are the implications of expressing this tumultuous and often tragic history in either tone?
In the Epilogue, Berlin states, “For black people, the new society that emerged from slavery bore the marks of the generations of captivity” (260). Which elements of the long history of slavery that Berlin recounts seemed to factor most prominently into the perspectives and strategies of former slaves following the Civil War? Why were these historical realities so important in the post-war moment? In your answer, include at least one example from each generation of captivity that Berlin discusses in the book, or a discussion of the ways in which a single historical condition or practice transcended multiple generations.