60 pages • 2 hours read
Michael LewisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Analyze Lewis’s role as a first-person narrator and his participation in the story he is telling. What effect does his presence have on the narrative?
Late in the book, Lewis groups together Sam’s ventures—including FTX and Alameda Research—into what he refers to as “Sam’s world.” Imagine that Sam’s world is its own character. How does it compare to other companies and organizations described in the book?
The book explores the world of cryptocurrency through one person: Sam Bankman-Fried. What are the advantages and limitations of exploring an entire industry through the lens of one central figure?
Lewis notes the ways in which cryptocurrency institutions differ from traditional financial institutions. What insights can be drawn from his exploration of these disparities?
Sam is described as fundamentally different from other humans. How does this characterization affect the portrayal of Sam’s morality?
Lewis describes Sam’s childhood at length. What comparisons does Lewis implicitly draw between Sam’s childhood and his behavior as an adult?
Lewis claims that media portrayals of Sam and his inner circle differ from what Lewis observed first-hand. How do these contrasting portrayals shape the characterization of the main figures in the book?
In describing Sam and many of his employees, Lewis paints a picture of youthful immaturity. What techniques does Lewis use to create this impression? How does this affect the reader’s perception of their guilt or innocence?
In the text, Lewis implies that he has a greater understanding of “Sam’s World” than, for instance, FTX’s new CEO, John Ray, who Lewis paints as a bumbling amateur. At the same time, reviewers have criticized Lewis for painting a too-glowing portrait of Sam and for glossing over obvious signs of criminality. Did insider access lead to a biased depiction? Is distance a requirement for objectivity, and if so, what role does objectivity play in a text such as this?
Effective altruists believe in the concept of “earning to give,” which justifies pursuing as much money as possible—regardless of how—to give it away to philanthropic causes. How does this approach differ from traditional philanthropy? Are there situations in which pursuing money may not be justified by this philosophy?
By Michael Lewis
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
Order & Chaos
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection