42 pages • 1 hour read
Vincent Bugliosi, Curt GentryA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Soon before the defense rested on November 19, a serious rift tore apart the defense team when Van Houten, Atkins, and Krenwinkel volunteered to be held in sole responsibility for the murders. Hughes said, “I refuse to take part in any proceeding where I am forced to push a client out the window” (507). After the defense rested, the three Family members stood and demanded to testify. Kanarek asked to separate his client’s case from that of the other three on trial. Manson testified on his own behalf outside of the presence of the jury. Bugliosi describes Manson’s hour-long speech as “hypnotic”: “These children that come at you with knives, they are your children. You taught them. I didn’t teach them. I just tried to help them stand up,” Manson said (509). He waived his right to testify before a jury, and so the trial went on recess for 10 days to give time for preparation of final arguments.
When court resumed on November 30, Hughes did not show up, and no one could account for him. He was last seen camping two days before, and Bugliosi feared the worst. Older appointed veteran defense attorney Maxwell Keith as Van Houten’s co-attorney, who soon after called for, and was denied, a mistrial. Bugliosi gave his closing arguments, tying the murders to Manson. The Family members continued to create disturbances, leading to an exchange in which Atkins grabbed Bugliosi’s notes and tore them in half. Older finally barred the Family from attending the closing arguments, which lasted until after the Christmas holiday. The sequestered jury was losing its patience and morale.
For the defense, Fitzgerald and Shinn gave succinct, if bafflingly, ineffective arguments. Kanarek’s defense took several exhausting days. In Bugliosi’s view, only Keith made a strong argument on behalf of Van Houten and the rest of the accused Family members, pointing out, “[I]f you believe that they were mindless robots, they cannot be guilty of premeditated murder” (528). In closing arguments, Bugliosi pointed to their rational conduct on the night of the murders, such as the destruction and disposal of evidence. On Friday, January 15, the jury went into deliberation. Over the course of 10 days, the jury would ask to review pieces of evidence, such as a copy of The Beatles’ White Album and transcripts of Atkins’ letters to her former cellmates.
On January 25, the jury came out of deliberation. There were rumors that a box of grenades was smuggled out of Camp Pendleton Marine Base for the Family to use at the courtroom, and so that day, the “Hall of Justice resembled a fortress” (537). The jury found Manson, Krenwinkel, and Atkins guilty of one count to commit murder and seven counts of murder in the first degree. They found Van Houten guilty of conspiracy and two counts of first-degree murder. Bugliosi tried in vain to find signs of emotion on the faces of the accused. He notes that Van Houten pointed to the box and said, “Look at the jury; don’t they look sad?” (539). Speaking to the press afterward, a shaken Fitzgerald told the press that a change of venue away from Los Angeles would have earned his clients an acquittal.
A penalty trail followed the verdict, the purpose of which was to determine whether those found guilty would receive life imprisonment or the death penalty. Bugliosi called police officer Thomas Drynan and Bernard “Lotsapoppa” Crowe to the stand. Both testified that they believed the Family members were predisposed toward murder. He ended his argument on February 1. The defense called up Krenwinkel’s parents, who testified that she was “gentle with animals” (543). Jane Van Houten, Leslie’s mother, argued for her daughter’s sense of humor and her history as a homecoming princess. Atkins’ father was uninterested in appearing, and for Manson, his most credible character witness was his parole officer, Samuel Barrett, who spoke mostly in defense of his own leniency with Manson. Several Family members, such as Squeaky Fromme and Catherine Share, spoke on Manson’s behalf. Bugliosi refers to them as a “parade of perjurers” (547). Atkins, speaking on her own behalf, attempted to take credit herself for the crimes committed by Charlie, admitting that she told Tate, “Look, bitch, I have no mercy for you” (560).
On February 16, Older, acknowledging the length of the trial, ended the 8-month-long sequestration of the jury, who returned the next day reinvigorated and in morale. Krenwinkel and Van Houten both took the stand. Neither expressed remorse for their actions. Ruth Ann Moorehouse and Steve Grogan both gave bizarre testimony. The defense called Bugliosi to the stand as an investigator, followed by several psychiatrists willing to testify that LSD had altered the minds of the accused. However, as when the first investigators botched the follow-up of the murders by overemphasizing the alien nature of drug use and distribution, so too did the defense botch their case by calling up psychiatric professionals, most of whom found something wrong with the defendants that could not be explained through overuse of LSD.
Final arguments were read over the course of several days starting on March 18. Reports that Manson had issued vague death threats made the press, and so the jury was sequestered again. Bugliosi recounted his case and Kanarek once again stalled, reading passage after passage from the New Testament. Keith offered the defense’s only cogent rebuttal by arguing against the death penalty. On March 29, the jury called for the death penalty for Manson and his three accomplices. In the end, the trial was the longest murder trial in American history up to that point, and among the most publicized. After Judge Older’s April 19 upholding of the death penalties for the accused, it was expected that the appeals process could take as long as five years.
Among the defense team, many of the lawyers immediately lost private practice clients and money as a result of their involvement in the case. Worse still, Hughes’ body was identified by the Ventura County sheriff's office soon after the trial concluded. His cause of death was unknown.
For the harassment of Barbara Hoyt, Lynnette “Squeaky” Fromme, Steve “Clem” Grogan, Catherine “Gypsy” Share and Dennis Rice were sentenced to 90 days in County Jail on April 16, 1971. Charles “Tex” Watson went on trial in August of 1971. Bugliosi led the prosecution in that case. In contrast to his alleged accomplices, Watson dressed conservatively for his appearance in court. Bugliosi noted that one of the defense attorneys, Sam Bubrick, was good friends with the presiding judge, Adolph Alexander. The judge repeatedly cross-examined testimonials for the prosecution. Nevertheless, on October 12, Watson was found guilty of seven accounts of first-degree murder and one account of conspiracy to commit murder. On October 21, his verdict was death.
Separate trials sought justice for other Manson Family victims. Atkins was found guilty in the murder of Gary Hinman. Manson, Grogan, and Bruce Davis were found guilty in the murder of Donald “Shorty” Shea, whose body had never been found. On August 21, 1971, Family members Mary Brunner, Catherine Share, Dennis Rice, Lawrence Bailey, Kenneth Como, and Charles Lovett attempted to rob a weapon surplus store in the Los Angeles suburb of Hawthorne. After a 10-minute gun battle in which no one was killed, the gang was apprehended. On February 18, 1972, the California Supreme Court abolished the death penalty. Manson and his gang were transferred to the general inmate population of their respective penal institutions, their sentences having been commuted to life in prison.
The final section of the book deals with the aftermath of the guilty verdict. After the prosecution rested on November 19, 1970, a drawn out and mismanaged process took over that would keep the jury sequestered and the court in session for over three more months.
By the time the defense was ready to make its case, it fell apart. Within this atmosphere, Manson, still gripped by delusion, asked for new testimony from his three codefendants, who now claimed that they were the sole masterminds behind the crimes; again, playing into the prosecution’s narrative of enthralled gang members willing to do anything for their leader. The Family had taken to frequently intimidating its own defense lawyers, and it was during this time that Hughes disappeared, under suspicion of foul play. His replacement was a conservative and respected veteran in the legal community named Maxwell Keith. Looking at the mountain of confusing testimony before him, he admitted “he could not judge their demeanor or credibility” (519). On this basis, he made one of the first sane suggestions of the trial, calling for a mistrial. His motion was denied. Nevertheless, Manson was indulged in a closed-door testimony in which he was allowed to display his disorder before all but the jury.
When the jury finally convened, they reached a verdict that was all but assured. Manson and his associates had been found guilty. Throughout the trial, Manson was repeatedly allowed to take center stage at a trial ostensibly in service of proving his guilt or innocence. He shocked everyone who saw him within that context: “I believe Charles Manson is unique. He is certainly one of the most fascinating criminals in American history, and it appears that there will never be another mass murder quite like him,” writes Bugliosi in conclusion (630). Given the credibility and volume of testimony against Manson, as well as the confessions of his associates, it is easy to imagine any other court finding Manson guilty of the hideous crimes he committed. Yet the shambolic nature of Older’s court, the sheer number of allowances by a judge who seemed happy to see a group of disturbed youth given the opportunity to hang themselves before the world, makes it hard to say that justice was served without qualification.