logo

55 pages 1 hour read

Marilynne Robinson

Housekeeping

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1980

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Women and Housekeeping

Content Warning: This novel contains depictions of death by suicide, mental health conditions, and child abandonment. Characters in the novel engage in stereotypical depictions of nomadic or transient people and unhoused individuals.

In many ways, Housekeeping is a novel about the different ways in which women in 1950s America could live their lives. Since housekeeping is a key aspect of any person’s life, and since this was mainly the domain of women in the 1950s, it is central to the novel. The first depiction of housekeeping in the novel is that of Edmund and Sylvia. Edmund’s first home was built almost completely underground so that the windows were at eye level. He leaves this home behind to build his home in Fingerbone. This home is said to be unconventionally built, but it stands the test of time, likely even failing to burn down even when Sylvie and Ruthie purposefully try to destroy it. While Edmund is responsible for building his home, it is the women who care for the home.

Sylvia cares for her daughters and later her granddaughters, often through food. She enjoys cooking for them and keeping them well fed. She also keeps up their appearance to make them look suitable in public. This housekeeping keeps the children happy while they are home, but it proves insufficient, as all three of her daughters eventually leave home and rarely if ever return despite frequently doting on their mother while they live at home. The fact of the daughters’ leaving implicates this type of caregiving as being at least in some ways insufficient. It failed to create a lifelong bond between the daughters and their mother. When the sisters-in-law, Lily and Nona, come to take over the caregiving and the housekeeping after Sylvia’s death, they prove largely ill-equipped to the task. More than housekeeping, they prove to be afraid of the house, sure it will fall down. In order to keep the children safe, they send them out into awful weather to skate on the ice in the hopes that the girls will not be home if and when the house falls. Lily and Nona represent the transient nature of housekeeping, especially in the patriarchy: The two are unmarried and essentially rootless when they come to take care of the girls, and they are placed in the role of caregiving by the grandmother’s death.

Sylvie is the next guardian of the girls, and her housekeeping proves to be completely unconventional. She views housekeeping as the accumulation of items such as cans and newspapers. She likes to keep the home dark, and in that darkness, the three residents cannot see the extent of the disarray that accumulates as well as the dust and garbage that permeates the house. Sylvie values freedom, and she does not naturally tie herself to one place. She does tie herself down for the sake of her nieces. She remains committed to her ideals, however, as she likes to bring the outside world inside their home. For example, a primary means of her housekeeping is to air out the house. Wildlife takes over different corners of the home and does not seem to bother either Sylvie or Ruthie. In this way, readers see somewhat of a positive depiction of this transience women endure. Sylvie embraces this transience that has been placed upon her, embracing her fate in a way that a Calvinist might, and she thus does not try to force her mark on the earth, like the patriarch Edmund did when he built the home. Instead, she floats freely in the transience she has forcibly inherited, and she allows herself and her home to become one with the earth, with it growing among them and their home. There is a pro-environmental element to Sylvie’s dealings with fate and the earth.

Lucille is not comfortable with this form of housekeeping. She sees that she is set apart from the rest of town. One day she leaves the home to go live with her home-economics teacher, Miss Royce. As a home-economics teacher, this woman represents the highest standards to which a housekeeper could aspire. While all the characters of the novel espouse different values in relation to housekeeping, none is shown as being superior, as none is sufficient in providing for the needs of all of the interested parties. None is completely deficient either, however. In this way, housekeeping is shown to be a personal value particular to individual people. No one form is shown to be superior to others. It is simply a matter of how much one embraces the fate bestowed upon them and in what way they embrace that fate.

American Transience and Rootedness for Women

Central to the novel is the pull between transience and rootedness. As with the theme of housekeeping, neither transience nor rootedness is shown to be superior to the other. Rather, they are individual goals and desires particular to each individual. It is, again, a question of how much and in what way one embraces the fate bestowed upon oneself. They are shown, however, to be related to family bonds.

Rootedness is shown through the characters of Sylvia, Lucille, and, to some extent, Lily and Nona. Sylvia is the matriarch of the family, and she tends to the home her husband, Edmund, built until her death. She stays in the home even after Edmund dies and her three daughters leave her. She stays in Fingerbone even when the other two widows of the train crash leave. While her daughters do not return to her, she also does not go to them. She remains a fixture in her home and represents traditional values. While none of her daughters demonstrate this same desire for rootedness, her granddaughter, Lucille, does. As Lucille grows up, she starts to move away from her aunt Sylvie’s unconventional lifestyle. She becomes embarrassed by signs of the woman’s transience such as her proclivity to sleep in public at times. While Lucille has close ties to Ruthie for most of their young lives, she leaves even Ruthie behind to gain the stability she has always lacked. This stability is more important to her than even her closest relationship. Lily and Nona represent rootedness in a slightly less stringent manner in the short time they appear in the book. They are willing to leave their home to come care for Ruthie and Lucille, but they are miserable almost from the start and wish to return to their own home, eventually succeeding in this. While their home is not described in detail, it is called a hotel, and as such, demonstrates less rootedness than Sylvia does.

The main characters that espouse wanderlust or transience are Edmund and Sylvie. Edmund is responsible for establishing the family in Fingerbone when he leaves his hometown on a train to head toward the mountains. He spends his life working on the train, demonstrating a lack of desire to stay rooted in one place. He maintains one home, but he travels for his job. Sylvie is a transient at heart. She writes to her mother while the aunts are living in Fingerbone, telling her mother where she is because otherwise her mother might not even know. When she takes up residence in Fingerbone, she keeps her coat on frequently and sleeps with her shoes under her pillow, demonstrating that she is a wanderer at heart. She goes to the train station before telling the girls she will be their guardian, likely as a way of saying goodbye to that lifestyle. One day the girls find her walking across a railway bridge. This association with trains is indicative of her transient spirit.

Sylvie is a kind of pioneer, an emblem of the traditional American spirit of wandering independently and setting up one’s life wherever one wishes. She is a woman, however, and thus the idea is nuanced in a patriarchal world; she does not necessarily end her wandering by setting up a home and staking land the way Edmund, the patriarch, does. Instead she acts in a more capacious manner, not forcing herself on the earth or fate but wandering simply to wander, remaining free-floating and adventurous and moving around the west while it grows upon and throughout her. Her home, as apart from Edmund’s, includes the earth itself. Edmund even built their home on top of a hill to avoid nature, to avoid floods, whereas Sylvie wishes to embrace that nature. Women, in many ways, have to be rooted to the place a man chooses for them, as emblematized by some of the other female characters; they have to be the home’s housekeeper. Edmund sets up roots, a home, after wandering and finding a land of independence. Sylvie, however, represents a feminist alternative that contains this wandering, this American spirit and culture, but that does not assert itself onto the earth.

Ruthie in many ways walks the line between transience and rootedness for much of the novel. In her younger years, like her sister, she craves stability and a guardian. Because of this, she is frequently afraid that her aunt will leave, leaving Ruthie to feel insecure. As she ages, however, she starts to take on many of the characteristics of Sylvie, almost unwittingly becoming more and more like her aunt. Eventually, in order to avoid losing her aunt through the courts, she attempts to burn down her family home to leave town with her aunt. She and her aunt leave Fingerbone over the railway bridge in the dark, and by the end of the novel, Ruthie describes herself as not being presentable enough most days to show back up in Fingerbone. This demonstrates that she has embraced the transient lifestyle to its fullest. What is not fully revealed by the end of the novel is how much of this transience is central to her character from the beginning and how much of it is drawn out through an attachment to her aunt built on a fear of abandonment. Despite the characters’ desires for either freedom or rootedness, they all experience some semblance of both, showing that neither idea is fully possible in this world. The book does not necessarily state that either form of life is better than the other; it simply observes the fates of women in a 20th-century America.

Family Bonds and Responsibility for Women in 20th-Century America

Family bonds and responsibility are shown to be important throughout the novel, both through the characters who live up to those responsibilities and those who fail to do so. Sylvia prioritizes family and the caretaking of her daughters and then her granddaughters. While she fails to provide her daughters with enough of what they need to keep them in her life in her later years, she provides for them well enough that Helen knows Sylvia will take care of her daughters and will do so in a way that is satisfactory. Sylvia does, indeed, live up to this standard and cares for her granddaughters to the best of her ability for the rest of her life, and she provides for them after her death by leaving everything to them in her will and finding who she believes will be suitable caretakers for them. Sylvie and Sylvia, however, represent different definitions of caring for family in a changing 20th century, particularly a century that saw such change for women, historically the primary caretakers of family.

Sylvie is unlike her mother, as her mother espouses conventionality while Sylvie espouses the exact opposite. Still, like her mother, Sylvie lives up to the responsibilities put on her by her family, sacrificing the most of anybody in the novel in order to do so. Despite being committed to a transient lifestyle and being defined by her wanderlust, Sylvie decides to stay in Fingerbone, in her family home, to raise her nieces. She is not particularly good at providing what children need, in a traditional sense, or what society expects of guardians, but she gives up most of what matters to her in order to put her family first and care for the daughters her sister left behind. In this way, she demonstrates, in the novel’s view, the importance of living up to the expectations that reliant family places on a person. She also demonstrates, however, that although men built the home, so to speak, in a patriarchy, it is women who will run it, who will perform the housekeeping and who will be the future of America in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Helen, a minor character in the novel who is pivotal to all that ensues, demonstrates the harm that comes when a person is not willing to live up to the responsibilities they have to their dependent family members. Like her sisters, she fails to be a real presence in her mother’s life once she leaves home. She then leaves her daughters at her mother’s house before dying by suicide. Helen’s death by suicide is depicted as an act of selfishness, and the children are left feeling abandoned as they are passed among different caretakers. While their grandmother finds purpose in caring for them, Lily and Nona, their next caretakers, find the responsibility to be somewhat of a burden. Sylvie stands by the girls and never abandons them, but in some ways she must give up her lifestyle of choice in order to care for her sister’s children. While themes like transience and housekeeping are shown to neither be a moral good or bad, failures of caregiving or empathy are presented as worthy of judgment throughout the novel.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text