logo

46 pages 1 hour read

Bill Gates

How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 9-AfterwordChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 9 Summary: “Adapting to a Warmer World”

Because everything Gates has discussed so far will take time to develop and implement, he focuses in this chapter on what we can do to adapt to the effects of climate change. He begins with the story of the Talam family in Kenya, whom he met through his foundation work. They had a small farm, on which they grew corn and raised one cow. The family of five used the cow’s milk and set aside a small amount to sell locally. Then a plant opened nearby that kept their milk cold, which allowed them to sell it around the country for higher prices. The plant also provided them with training, and soon the Talams were able to buy three more cows, dramatically increasing their income and opportunities for their children.

Here, Gates notes that an earlier chapter named cattle as the livestock that contribute most to climate change. However, he emphasizes that the Talams did what anyone in their position would do and that we should view their story only as a success. Certainly, climate change will begin to affect farmers like them in Africa and other places: Floods and droughts will happen more often, soil will lose moisture as heat causes it to evaporate, and livestock like the Talams’ cows will produce less milk. This could all be enough to tip them back into poverty conditions. His point is that people like the Talams, who live in places like Africa, have contributed the least to global warming yet stand to suffer the most from it. Over time, the gap between rich and poor nations will only grow larger and have negative effects on the health and longevity of poor people. Thus, we should do even more than we have been to help them with health care and food production.

Gates helped lead an organization called the Global Commission on Adaptation, which studied and recommended ways that governments, businesses, and people can adapt to climate change. The commission recommends and promotes advancements to help mitigate the risks and challenges associated with climate change and help support families’ livelihoods. For example, an agricultural research group called CGIAR contributed to developing new strains of corn and rice that can help mitigate the effects of climate change. Parts of India prone to flooding now grow “scuba rice,” a new variety that can survive underwater for up to two weeks. Another of the commission’s recommendations is to focus on the most vulnerable people, such as women, by giving them training and working to secure their rights. A third suggestion is to make policy decisions with an eye on climate change.

Overall, adaptation involves working to reduce risks ahead of events, providing emergency services during them, and recovering after them. Four main steps can help these efforts. First, cities need to grow differently than in the past: City planners need the latest information and modeling to make sound building decisions on simple (but important) things like how high to build a seawall or a bridge. Second, preserving and protecting nature areas like wetlands is crucial because they’re a natural defense against weather events. Third, developing more sources of drinking water will be essential as natural reservoirs dry up or become polluted. This might entail filtering salt out of seawater or converting moisture in the air to liquid. Fourth, more funding is necessary: We must get creative about making investments in these areas attractive to private investors; right now, they see no real return for years to come.

The worst-case scenarios for adaptation include drastic measures that we might need to take to avert a large-scale climate disaster. Geoengineering is one such measure. This involves making temporary changes to alter atmospheric or ocean temperatures, such as creating a cloud of tiny particles to block sunlight for a brief time. These ideas are controversial, but as Gates writes, “There may come a day when we don’t have a choice. Best to prepare for that day now” (178).

Chapter 10 Summary: “Why Government Policies Matter”

In this chapter, Gates shifts from the discussion of technology and alternative energy sources to looking at government policies and how they can help us reach zero emissions. He shows how past attempts to deal with pollution and energy shortages resulted in effective legislation like the Clean Air Act of 1963 and the creation of the Department of Energy in the 1970s. In addition, federal efforts led the way in other areas like making electricity available nationwide, and state and local governments make their own policy that affects energy use. Thus, Gates argues, governments at all levels create policies that truly matter in the fight against climate change.

Government can spur the move toward clean energy through many types of policies. First, they can invest in R&D in areas that private companies won’t due to the lack of incentives. When something bears fruit, private money will then help it reach the market. A perfect example of this is the internet, which began as a government-funded project. Also, governments can drive Green Premiums down to zero through incentives. Using carbon has a cost, but society bears that cost, and it won’t be due for years to come. Gates argues that cost must be part of the equation so that dirty energy is more expensive and clean energy is cheaper. Meanwhile, we can overcome barriers unrelated to the market through education, training, and information.

In addition, when creating market incentives for clean energy, governments must keep policies up to date. Policies must reflect the latest technology and meet the needs of the present—while helping ensure that people aren’t left behind: Change always affects different people differently, and some inevitably stand to lose out. Governments should be ready to help any way they can—through job training, subsidies, and the like. Alone, technology or government policies cannot succeed. They must work in coordination along with markets. Businesses need the means to get ideas to the marketplace, which involves consistent and predictable government policies.

Chapter 11 Summary: “A Plan for Getting to Zero”

In this chapter, Gates introduces his plan for the specific things that governments can do to help get us to zero emissions. First, he clarifies the difference between two dates that often come up in this discussion. Some advocate reducing emissions by 2030 and getting to zero by 2050. While working toward both sounds reasonable, Gates thinks we should focus only on the latter. If we try to do both simultaneously, he argues, we may end up with competing goals and pursue early benchmarks that could hinder getting to zero.

Gates’s plan taps into many disciplines to learn how to reach zero and focuses on increasing both the supply and demand of innovations. He’s careful to stress that innovation isn’t just in the technological sense but involves novel approaches and methods in all areas, including government policies and business models. To increase the supply of the technologies he discussed in earlier chapters, the US government should increase its annual budget for R&D fivefold. In addition, it should take on projects that Gates calls “high risk, high reward” (201). Fear of failure and wasting money often leads to safe investments—but now is the time to go bold.

To be most effective, money for R&D should go to the areas of most need. Too often, scientists think research should be “pure” and disconnected from practical end use, creating an unnecessary division. Gates argues that some of the best breakthroughs have come when a goal for use is set at the start. A recent example is the “SunShot” program of the past decade that helped lower the cost of solar energy. Likewise, government and industry should work hand in hand from the beginning. Again, an artificial division between these two stages of innovation (government early, industry late) is all too common; businesses know what works in the market and how to scale up, so government should begin consulting with them early.

The demand side includes the proof phase and scaling up. The first can be a challenge; not only is it necessary to see whether something works in real-life conditions, but the proof phase must overcome some significant barriers. You need to “drive down the cost and risks of early adoption, develop supply chains, test your business model, and help consumers get comfortable with the new technology” (203). Governments at all levels can help here because they buy substantial amounts of goods and services. By prioritizing emerging technology, they can help create demand and thus a market. Additionally, governments can create up-to-date policies and incentives to lower risk for the private sector and ensure that emerging technologies can compete. Finally, governments need to build the infrastructure to get these technologies to the marketplace. For example, the viability of electric cars requires a network of charging stations.

When a technology is ready, we must scale it up. Governments have a lot of work to do here because, as Gates reminds us, we must triple our power output and make it carbon-free by mid-century. First, we should put a price on carbon to cut Green Premiums. This could be a tax or what’s called a cap-and-trade system, in which a limit is set and businesses can buy and sell their allotment of emissions. Clean electricity standards could also be set to require that power companies get a certain percentage of their electricity from clean sources. The same approach could help limit the use of fuel and products like steel and cement, requiring the use of certain clean technologies. Finally, incentives and policies can also require the retirement of older, carbon-emitting facilities and equipment before the end of their useful lives.

The final part of the chapter looks at how government at various levels might divide up these tasks. Regardless of how it works out in real life, Gates emphasizes that it’s important to get all levels of government thoroughly involved in the process to complete such a giant undertaking. Rich nations must lead the way by committing to zero emissions by 2050, helping less-rich nations do the same as soon after 2050 as possible, making specific plans to reach this goal, and funding research into clean energy. Even countries that lack the resources to lead the way can take measures, such as making trade agreements only with other countries that have committed to reducing greenhouse gases.

Chapter 12 Summary: “What Each of Us Can Do”

In the last chapter, Gates outlines the steps that individuals can take as we all work toward zero emissions. The best thing a citizen can do is engage with elected officials at all levels. Politicians set policy but have a lot of demands on their time, so keeping them focused on fighting climate change is important. People can also run for office themselves to bring this issue to the forefront.

As consumers, people often think of personal changes they make, like buying green products. While this helps signal that a market exists for such things, the larger impact comes from the systems that we’re all a part of. The electric grid is one example. In many places, consumers have a choice of getting some or all electricity from green sources. By opting for a green plan, consumers tell utility companies that a demand for clean energy exists. Home equipment—from heat pumps to light bulbs—can make a difference too.

As employees or employers, we can take similar measures in our business settings. Just as governments set policies and make decisions on goods and services, so do companies. They can adopt green policies like using an electric fleet. Some large companies even set up an internal carbon tax for each of their divisions. Business leaders must be willing to take on some of the higher risks involved in investing in new methods and technologies that might not pan out. Finally, as noted earlier, industry can work together with governments on R&D.

Gates ends by acknowledging the difficulties of the current political situation as it relates to climate change. He writes that he has no quick fix for that but hopes we can bridge the differences that exist through continued conversation and staying focused on the facts. He’s optimistic that we can reach the goal of zero emissions because of what’s he’s seen in both technological breakthroughs and the ability of people to do extraordinary things.

Afterword Summary: “Climate Change and COVID-19”

The brief Afterword concludes the book by referring to the COVID-19 pandemic that hit the world as Gates was working on this book. He draws many parallels between the pandemic and climate change, starting with international cooperation. In addition, science must lead the way and dictate responses to both, and solutions must focus on those who are most affected. In both crises, rich nations must step up and help those with fewer resources, and governments can invest in R&D that simultaneously boosts the economy and innovation. Gates points out that despite the pandemic’s disastrous consequences, it hasn’t dampened the public’s desire to tackle climate change. He concludes that the best response to the dismal year of 2020 would be to double down on work during the next decade to reach the goal of zero emissions by mid-century.

Chapter 9-Afterword Analysis

This last section discusses what’s possible now to adapt to the effects of climate change that are already taking place and explores recommendations for the coming years to reach the goal of zero emissions by mid-century. The emphasis here is on the role of governments, a main theme of the book, although it also addresses the actions of individuals. Governments must lead the way in both adapting to climate change and getting to zero. Adaptation involves public policy, such as planning for sustainable city growth and managing coastal cities. These efforts necessarily involve government entities. In addition, both adaptation and getting to zero share the need to create demand through incentives. As bullish as Gates is about the role of private investment and businesses to create innovative technologies, he admits that these entities are risk averse. This means that they follow market conditions rather than create them and invest only in ventures likely to turn a profit. Fossil fuels can be very profitable, so we can’t rely on the market in this case. Government policy can make the difference by, for instance, passing laws and setting tax rates.

Gates wasn’t always such an advocate of government intervention. He writes that as the head of Microsoft he thought that policymakers in Washington, DC, “would only keep us from doing our best work” (183). The US government brought an antitrust suit against Microsoft in 1998, and Gate notes that in hindsight the case made him realize that he should have engaged with government leaders from the beginning. Indeed, all of Chapter 11, which introduces his plan for getting to zero, details how governments and industry must collaborate to solve the issue of climate change. Gates points to the many advantages that governments have and describes the government-industry relationship as symbiotic.

Also, he argues, the governments of rich nations must lead the way if we’re to succeed in getting to zero. Only they have the capability to invest heavily in the R&D necessary for breakthroughs. A handful of countries like the US must put up the money to reach the goal for the entire world. Gates emphasizes that we should not consider this charity. Instead, we should view it as a business opportunity. He compares the situation to how the National Institutes of Health shares its work with scientists worldwide while helping US universities and start-ups—and how Defense Department investments led to the development of the internet and the microchip. In each case, public investment in R&D created jobs and, in the latter case, whole new industries. In short, such investments pay off and contribute something to the rest of the world.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text