67 pages • 2 hours read
Deanna RaybournA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Raybourn is particularly attentive to gender roles and stereotypes, particularly as they shape cisgender women’s professional and personal lives. While Billie and her friends routinely confront sexism, ageism, and misogyny, they also use gender stereotypes to their advantage. Constance tells Billie that “sex is a weapon” (89), and she encourages its use. On her first mission, Billie experiences sexual harassment not only from the man she is there to kill, but also from her co-workers who do not see her as an equal. On this mission, her role as a stewardess is to disarm the Bulgarian delegation, which sees her and the others as a kind of decoration. The bodyguard assumes the new pilots are the potential threats, not the four women who ultimately carry out the assassination. The group’s later assassination of a corrupt Catholic bishop depends on them being dressed as nuns, once again relying on the association of femininity with powerlessness.
Much of Billie’s character arc and growth comes from moments when she explicitly confronts misogyny and, later, ageism. In her early career, she made an enemy of Vance when she killed to save his life, depriving of him of the prestige of eliminating a former Nazi. He calls her “little girl” (275) as an expression of his anger, underlining the sexism beneath his rage. Decades later, the assassin sent to kill the four members of Project Sphinx calls Billie “granny” (67), assuming she is not a threat. However, Billie is able to dispatch him with minimal effort. All four women frequently play up their age as its own disguise. Natalie notes ruefully during the Paris segment of their mission, “I am dressed like Jessica Tandy” (247), referring to the American actress who became the oldest woman to receive an Academy Award. Billie complains that young people frequently ignore her in public, to the point of giving her homicidal urges. If younger women are underestimated as sex objects, older ones are largely dismissed for their perceived lack of desirability.
Just as their younger selves exploited their sexuality as necessary, Billie’s trap for Vance relies on his misogyny combined with his belief age has made them weak. Vance sneeringly assumes that Billie accidentally alerted him to her location by texting Martin from Benscombe. In reality, she deliberately lured him there to ensure the others could help her dispatch him and any agents working with him. Minka uses her menopause app as a bomb trigger, illustrating that underestimating women can be perilous.
Raybourn uses the character of Naomi to underline that women still rely on other women to recognize their potential and power. Naomi cryptically alerts Billie to the fact she and her friends are scapegoats for someone else, making Billie alert to the possibility of a traitor in the Museum This, combined with her intuition in taking the dossier, leads to her identifying Martin as the traitor. When she arrives at Benscombe, Naomi sees Helen as a threat, knowing the older woman’s superior marksmanship skills. She tells all four that she trusted them to salvage the situation and treats them as equal partners in resolving the crisis. Through the respectful attitude Naomi shows the women, Raybourn models the productive partnerships that can arise when non-misogynist leaders value the contribution of women of all backgrounds and ages.
The thriller genre often relies on the reader becoming sympathetic to main characters’ struggles to survive, which can include them committing violent and murderous acts. Billie and her friends, even before they are imperiled, have the ultimate in unconventional jobs: They kill for money though with the purpose of eliminating war criminals, righting historical wrongs, and thwarting dictatorships. Billie is careful to point out, “we don’t murder on our days off any more than a thoracic surgeon will cut your rib cage open for kicks. We have standards” (25). In the present-tense sections of the narrative, the first two people Billie kills, Fogerty and Sweeney, are fellow professional assassins who have clear murderous intent. In these moments, it is easy for the reader to embrace Billie’s perspective on events because Raybourn zeroes in on the details of the fight scenes and Billie’s drive to survive.
Other passages, however, admit the moral ambiguity surrounding a life of professional assassination. When Richard recruits Billie, he tells her “we don’t make killers” (50), implying he has already detected some essential homicidal instinct in her that suits his purposes. Mary Alice hesitates to tell her wife, Akiko, what she does for a living, fearing not only the revelation of her past deceptions, but also how Akiko will feel about the nature of her job. Natalie’s mourning after Sweeney’s death and her admission that she has “scars” (187) introduce an element of contrition and culpability into an otherwise action-packed narrative. This is in contrast to the past tense narratives, which present truly reprehensible characters prior to their deaths, especially the Nazi baroness who has no remorse for her war crimes and complicity in genocide. Billie tells Natalie that they are “exterminators” ridding humanity of a plague, and she seems to accept this, seeing the next round of kills as an inescapable survival choice (187-89).
The other moral ambiguity within the text concerns the final few scenes, highlighting Helen’s conflict over killing and Naomi’s choice to be a bystander; Helen is the character most preoccupied with death and mortality because of the loss of her husband, and it is possible she only overcomes her reluctance because Billie is Martin’s hostage. Helen is thus only able to kill because she is defending another. Later, it is Akiko who points out to Naomi that her inaction risked all four women’s lives. Naomi accepts this accusation, noting that it is a part of her professional training, and expects the others to understand this. Raybourn resolves this tension by having the four women embrace retirement, assuring the reader that their days of murder are likely behind them.
Professional and personal bonds underlie much of the narrative depth of Killers of a Certain Age. Constance creates the all-female killing squad out of nostalgia and loyalty to her own group, and her code name is Shepherdess. She even considers Project Sphinx her “little flock” (132). Later, Constance tells Billie that the key to any successful operation is to “trusting your team” (296). Billie has taken this to heart as she shows deep concern for Helen’s mental health and frailty after her husband’s death, thinking, “one good hug and I could snap her in two” (28).
Billie becomes a successor to Constance, impressing the others with her ability to lead and adapt to their new circumstances. She is the only one carrying a false passport and credit cards, and she provides them with their first safe house. Billie’s relationship with Minka is key to the team’s success, and Billie’s ultimate priority is the preservation of the group even if this means she faces personal danger.
Mary Alice faces a different kind of conflict as the team’s sole married member. If Billie embraces the mission out of a desire to save the others, Mary Alice acts because taking out the Museum leadership is her only path left to a renewed and restored marriage. She becomes angry when Billie accuses her of impaired judgment because of Akiko, declaring, “my wife is not a problem, but I don’t expect you to understand that” (101). The meaning of her words only becomes clear later. Though the reader understands that Billie has chosen her career over family life, it is only the introduction of Taverner that reveals just how challenging that choice was. Billie comes to embrace her role as the shepherdess of the Sphinxes, the woman watching over a flock of capable killers and declaring “nothing would happen to her girls while she was around” (295). She reconciles with Taverner to achieve her goal, accepting his role as a backup in the plan and trusting him to support her.
All four women experience a kind of mourning process when they realize the organization to which they devoted their lives has been corrupted and is now pursuing them as targets. Billie notes, “Mary Alice sat with her head in her hands while Helen covered her mouth and Natalie swore up a blue streak” (168). Though Vance is a key villain in the narrative, it is Martin who acts as the principal traitor. He tries to assure Billie of his concern for her and hides his role as the author of the dossier. Rather than surrender, he endangers Billie’s life in a futile effort to save his own. Naomi’s emergence as the museum’s new leader underlines that the organization will be rebuilt with more collectivist principles in mind.
Raybourn emphasizes this theme by relying on flashbacks to tell the story, and it is Billie’s explicit reliance on her shared past with her team that underlines the power of historical and personal memory. To explain how Billie became the leader she is, Raybourn takes the reader back to Benscombe house at a time when Billie has not yet found her niche. The other team members have pasts that link them to war and resistance: Helen follows her family legacy of government service and espionage, Natalie is the granddaughter of a Jewish Resistance fighter, and Mary Alice is driven by her family’s losses in the Vietnam War. Constance tells herself that her new recruits, unlike their predecessors, will “even the odds that have been stacked against them. And they will survive” (113), showing that although the group is linked to the past, they are not doomed to repeat it.
In a similar vein, Billie makes a point to remember her difficult past rather than avoid it. This starts in her youth when she refuses to have a scar on her face corrected even for the sake of making herself less recognizable. She carries Taverner’s St. Christopher’s medal with her to New Orleans, decades after their relationship ends. And, most importantly, it is the memory of past missions that helps dictate the path she chooses when to take out the Museum board. Most importantly, it is her knowledge of Vance’s character and her memory of the Zanzibar mission that lead her to craft the final plan to save herself and her friends. She not only knows Vance’s history but also that he will continue to underestimate her, which leads to his downfall.
The choice of Benscombe as both final refuge and last stand underlines that as much as they resent aging, Billie and her friends know that their past is a part of their power and proof they have grown, changed, and learned. Billie and Taverner reach a similar conclusion when they each accept that the lives they had apart were the lives to which they were best suited, regardless of how much they have missed one another. Billie’s willingness to both recall and learn from her past underlines her bravery is more than just physical: In both confronting Vance and letting Taverner back into her life, Billie has fully confronted all of her past regrets and can move forward into a promising future.