57 pages • 1 hour read
Carol S. DweckA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Dweck views natural talent as real yet insufficient for producing the kinds of success and achievement that are often celebrated in American culture. As a society, Dweck believes Americans value success and its accolades over the effort and processes of getting there. This, she asserts, sets people up to view great talents and famous people as superior and superhuman when, in fact, they may be ordinary people with the character, passion, perseverance, and resources to reach their goals. As she asserts in her narrative and counternarrative of the story of Thomas Edison, this misconception occurs because stories of great achievements tend to focus on the product, not the processes that produced it. In Chapter 4, Dweck explores the world of sports and the impact of pervasive beliefs in natural talent on those involved: players, coaches, analysts, and fans. Dweck holds up examples of players with great talent at the start of their careers, such as McEnroe and baseball player Billy Beane, against counterexamples of people who started with little ability but became legends.
In Dweck’s mind, the belief in natural talent hampers success because it encourages distorted thinking. This includes the view that superior starting ability makes practice unnecessary, which leads players to rest on their laurels. McEnroe and Beane thought their talent excused their lack of work ethic and their negative behavior, and they eventually began to lose passion for the sport because they were not growing. Rather, they were simply trying to validate their right to continue to be called great. In contrast, players who start with little skill or talent or with incredible setbacks may eclipse talented competitors because they understand that success is about work and processes.
Dweck develops her argument regarding the role of a growth mindset in great athletes by subverting the stories that are commonly told about icons like Muhammad Ali, Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods, and Wilma Rudolph. She does this not to discount the idea of natural talent but to temper the belief that talent takes people all the way to the top. Jordan, says Dweck, wasn’t considered talented, but he was “the hardest working athlete, perhaps in the history of the sport” (85), showing that even he did not rely on natural ability to become a star. Dweck notes that Joyner-Kersee wasn’t the fastest woman alive because she was fast but because she developed the mental capacity to “talk herself through an asthma attack during her last world championship” (94). This reiterates that even those with talent must learn to overcome mental and physical setbacks. Likewise, Ali “had great speed, but he didn’t have the physique of a great fighter, he didn’t have the strength, and he didn’t have the classical moves” (84); however, he became a famous boxing champion.
Most of Dweck’s research directly tackles questions regarding individual success and achievement. At the core, mindset theory arises from a desire to understand why some individuals are so successful and achieve so much, yet others struggle to reach their goals despite wanting them so badly. Dweck believes the recipe for success and achievement boils down to whether a person believes they can grow their abilities and develop as a human being. She uses contrasting narratives throughout the book to shift readers’ thinking regarding the components of success and to prime them to embrace the notion that an act as simple as recognizing that beliefs are a choice can profoundly limit or enhance an individual’s motivation to achieve.
In addition to citing numerous studies in Chapter 2 to lay a foundation for her premise that mindset impacts achievement, Dweck explores success and achievement by deconstructing three prominent sources of success in American culture: sports, business, and love. In Chapter 4, she subverts the notion that success in sports comes from natural talent by sharing narratives that focus on the processes successful sports stars undertook to emerge as the best in their fields, rather than dwelling on the success itself. For example, Dweck emphasizes that Wilma Rudolph not only overcame the setback of a paralyzed left leg but also “lost every race she entered in her first track meet” (88). Dweck’s research shows that perseverance and passion lead the dedicated to greater achievement than talent alone.
In Chapter 5, she similarly subverts the notion that top CEOs are those with the greatest minds and natural business acumen. Using narratives of Enron’s Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, among others, as cautionary tales, Dweck illustrates that genius does not automatically create successful companies. In fact, it often works against a company’s success because CEOs like Skilling tend to “use their brainpower [...] not to learn but to intimidate” (120), thereby creating business cultures that do not promote growth. Successful executives promote growth and uplift workers, as Dweck illustrates through counternarratives such as that of IBM executive Lou Gerstner. By encouraging reflection and growth, he turned IBM from a failing company to one that was “defining the future direction of the industry” (131).
Finally, in Chapter 6, Dweck explores many anecdotes from both her personal life and studies regarding people who are “lucky” or “unlucky” in love. She subverts the fairy-tale premise of narratives like Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella, in which couples effortlessly live happily ever after. Instead, Dweck focuses on narratives that make the work of relationships transparent. She illustrates that success in relationships is not automatic but requires complex interpersonal skills and a willingness to change and grow, skills that she believes everyone can develop. Success, Dweck asserts, has less to do with ability than with the sum of effort, perseverance, and willingness to grow.
If Dweck believes there is a recipe for success and achievement, it lies within her observation that advanced starting ability and high initial success do not accurately predict a person’s potential or ability to grow and stretch. Not only can all humans develop and improve, people often achieve well beyond their perceived potential. Dweck shares narratives of teachers who overcame great odds to help their students grow, such as East Los Angeles calculus teacher Jaime Escalante—whose story is told in the movie Stand and Deliver—and Chicago educator Marva Collins in support of this message. Despite negative labels and stereotyping, Escalante believed that his Chicano students at Garfield High School could understand and value calculus as much as any white student and set out to prove it by enrolling them in AP Calculus. Because he believed in them, they believed in themselves, and most of his students passed the exam. Similarly, Collins took in low-income Black students, many of whom were labeled as “severely dysfunctional” by Chicago public schools, and taught them to read and thrive in a robust classical education program. By highlighting examples of humans who equipped others to overcome the limitations of fixed labels and elevated them to parity with—or greater than—that of students with access to the best schools in the country, Dweck provides models for teachers and other people who shape young people’s lives. Her research posits that the limits to a person’s potential are the ones they believe are true.
Though she references narratives, studies, and real-world examples to prove her point, Dweck’s strong belief in the power of humans to grow and change becomes most readily actionable through the exercises at the end of each chapter and throughout Chapter 8. These activities provide readers with the necessary framework for developing themselves and learning to help those around them grow. Dweck is careful to point out that simply having a capacity to change does not mean that people are equipped with the skills to bring about this transformation on their own. As she emphasizes, “Change isn’t like surgery. Even when you change, the old beliefs aren’t just removed like a worn-out hip or knee and replaced with better ones” (224). This statement reminds readers that potential must be actively developed; teachers, coaches, and parents must cultivate a growth mindset within themselves to steer others toward this development.
Dweck models the type of encouragement and process-oriented feedback that develop human potential when she clearly labels and guides the reader through steps toward growth. For example, she reminds readers that a goal is not enough; rather, “concrete plans—plans you can visualize—about when, where, and how you are going to do something lead to really high levels of follow-through” (238). This guides the reader to develop an action plan with the steps that are necessary for growth; in turn, they coach others in their charge to do the same. Though everyone has untapped potential, Dweck is clear that openness to feedback, a willingness to put in effort, and the application of appropriate strategies are the factors that help people stretch beyond their limits.
For Dweck, a person’s perspective, whether fixed or growth-oriented, affects all aspects of their lives. More than natural talent or high initial achievement, Dweck believes that perspective accounts for individuals who not only succeed but beat the odds and stay at the top once they’ve reached it. To support this premise and convince skeptical readers, she presents a battery of contrasting narratives, immerses readers in contrasting thought processes and responses, and guides them through the steps that are necessary to deconstruct their own perspectives to determine how their mindset impacts them.
In Chapter 1, Dweck almost immediately immerses the reader in the world of each mindset, asking them to imagine, as her test subjects did, a day full of painful but ultimately surmountable setbacks. She follows up with questions geared toward helping the reader construct their own responses before walking them through the responses of her fixed-minded participants and then those of her growth-minded participants. The results differ sharply and intimately. Dweck shares that fixed-minded responses to the day included feeling “worthless and dumb—that everyone’s better than me” (8), indicating that setbacks have a profound impact on the self-worth of fixed-minded individuals. By contrast, growth-minded individuals responded with constructive observations, such as, “I need to try harder in class, be more careful when parking the car, and wonder if my friend had a bad day” (9). This indicates that growth-minded individuals do not internalize failure the way that fixed-minded people do. Because one group comes away more deeply harmed by events, Dweck encourages readers to develop empathy while illustrating the power of one simple belief to influence responses to an entire day.
Similarly, Dweck employs contrast to illustrate the impact of each perspective in real-world scenarios. Though she focuses mainly on the individual impacts of fixed and growth mindsets in her exploration of the world of sports, Dweck slowly reveals in later chapters that these two perspectives create lasting impacts for individuals and society. For example, workers in fixed-mindset companies express “greater interest in leaving their company for another” (143), while those in growth-minded companies report “a much greater sense of empowerment, ownership, and commitment” (143).
Mindset, Dweck argues, has huge implications for addressing everyday business worries regarding turnover and retention and may even help explain and solve such societal problems as bullying and school shootings. In the Chapter 6 subsection “Bullies and Victims: Revenge Revisited,” Dweck connects the fixed mindset with bullying because “bullying is about judging. It is about establishing who is worthy or important” (169). These traits are important to those with fixed mindsets, as they view the world in terms of judgment and validation. Dweck escalates the stakes further in her examination of bullying victims with fixed mindsets. Dweck explains that “when people feel deeply judged by rejection, their impulse is to feel bad about themselves and to lash out in return. They have been cruelly reduced and wish to reduce in return” (169), leading to revenge fantasies and even revenge-seeking. She extends this argument to tragedies such as school shootings.
Throughout the book, Dweck communicates the power of perspective, which is at the core of mindset. The way a person views the world can lead to personal growth and achievement; however, it can also provoke low self-esteem, problems sustaining relationships, abuse of others, and even violent revenge. For Dweck, these contrasts mark the growth mindset as healthier for individuals and for society, and they reveal the power that both perspectives hold to influence and shape business and culture.