44 pages • 1 hour read
Claire DedererA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Auteur theory is an influential form of analysis in film studies that emphasizes an individual filmmaker’s (usually the director’s) stylistic impact on both films and the art form as a whole. This framework positions filmmakers as authors (the theory takes its name from the French word for author). In Monsters, Dederer examines several figures widely considered to be auteurs, including Roman Polanski and Woody Allen. She finds homology between the idea of an auteur and the idea of a genius, both of which invest artists (typically male artists) with a sort of mystical, creative authority.
Genius is a label frequently applied to influential artists that Dederer endeavors to define in Chapter 5. Defined by Merriam-Webster as “extraordinary intellectual power especially as manifested in creative activity,” Dederer posits that the label is frequently used as a way to excuse artists’ problematic behaviors. She argues that the idea of genius is unavoidably tied to notions of ruthless masculinity, having been consistently used to describe figures such as Pablo Picasso, Ernest Hemingway, and contemporary male rockstars. The gendered nature of the term is central to Dederer’s feminist analysis, highlighting Misogynistic Structures in the Art World.
Liberalism is a school of political philosophy with its roots in the Enlightenment that emphasizes individual agency and rights. In Monsters, Dederer explores her own liberal politics, specifically left-wing politics in America during the 2010s. The aspect of this political ideology that she focuses the most on, and ultimately rejects, is its tendency toward believing that history—and therefore its people—are inherently progressive.
“Monster,” the titular term in Dederer’s book, is also the word she struggles to define, tentatively landing on “someone whose behavior disrupts our ability to apprehend the work on its own terms” (47). Dederer applies this definition specifically to artists, but she presents her analysis as more broadly relevant as well. In Dederer’s eyes, the monstrosity lies both in the harmful action of the artist and in the permanent impact that these actions have on the audience’s experience of viewing their work.
Puget Sound is an estuary system on the northwestern coast of Washington state, roughly 100 miles long. The Puget Sound region includes several major cities, chiefly, Seattle, Tacoma, and Olympia. A lifelong resident of Seattle, Dederer lives on an island in the sound, which she refers to frequently throughout the book. The intimate relationship between her environment, her work, and her cultural perspective is highlighted in various ways from chapter to chapter, always specifically alluding to the Puget Sound region.
Radical feminism is a branch of the feminist movement with its roots in the civil rights movement of the 1960s that demands an overhaul of all societal structures that maintain male hegemony through the oppression of women. This form of feminism reflects a divergence from older branches that focused primarily on alleviating misogyny on domestic and local scales, and which placed little to no emphasis on other forms of oppression that intersect with misogyny, including racism and anti-LGBTIA ideology. In Monsters, Dederer explores her own increasingly radicalized feminism, as well as that of the women around her in the context of the Trump presidency and #MeToo Movement. She also highlights radical feminist artists in the latter half of the book, including Ana Mendieta and Valerie Solanas.
The stain, a metaphor Dederer consistently invokes throughout Monsters, posits that an artist’s biography is inextricable from their art, complicating the experience of audience members who want to consume art in a vacuum. Furthermore, Dederer suggests that consumers of art are also stained by their own lives, and that they bring their stains to their viewings of art. She argues that the contemporary demand for unstained artists is a utopian ideal that is ultimately unrealistic, and that consumers need to be honest with themselves about their own stains.