logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Kent Nerburn

Neither Wolf Nor Dog

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 1994

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 12-16Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 12 Summary: “Welcome to Our Land”

Nerburn wakes to find that Grover’s car is parked at the edge of a large powwow gathering, and feels excited at the prospect of attending. When Nerburn asks Dan if the powwow is their final destination, Dan encourages him not to worry about the future and to focus on the beauty of their present moment. Nerburn replies that he feels destabilized without a clear view of what their plans are and what the project will be. Dan compares their plans with flowing water, explaining that the project will take as long as it needs to take.

As Nerburn grows more confused and frustrated, Dan reveals that he believes Nerburn was sent to him by the Creator to help fulfill a sacred task. Nerburn is moved by Dan’s vulnerability, and asks for forgiveness for his stubbornness. He finds himself apologizing repeatedly. Dan assures Nerburn that he is a good man, and that he can help indigenous people. Grover brings Dan a drum, and the two men begin to sing. Dan reveals that the Creator gave him a special power to speak to white people, and that he must use this power to advocate for his people.

Chapter 13 Summary: “Tatanka”

Dan decides the group should not attend the powwow, acknowledging that Nerburn needs to contact his family. Grover takes the truck off-road and onto the plains. In the bumpy back seat, Nerburn and Fatback both struggle with carsickness. When the group stops for a bathroom break, Nerburn expresses concern about the safety of driving off road in such an isolated location. Grover explains that they’re in “Indian country”, and that a lack of roads and houses doesn’t mean they’re alone. He compares his car to a horse, and laughs at the fact that white people name cars after horses but don’t treat them like horses.

Nerburn leaves the car to find Dan, who climbed down a hill to relieve himself. He finds Dan crouched close to the ground, staring into the distance. Dan points to a large bush and, as the men watch, it is revealed to be a buffalo. Dan explains that a buffalo (Tatanka in Lakota) can hide or reveal itself to humans as it chooses. When Nerburn challenges him, Dan compares his relationship to buffalo to Nerburn’s relationship to his dogs or cats, explaining that humans and animals communicate regularly.

Chapter 14 Summary: “Seeing with Both Eyes”

As the group drives across the plains, Dan speaks on three differences between white Americans and indigenous people. First, he argues that white Americans value freedom, while indigenous communities value honor. Dan explains that the pilgrims came to America to avoid oppression, then sought that same oppressive power themselves. Dan argues that indigenous people, on the other hand, value honor, which he describes as an internal sense of right and wrong. He suggests that indigenous people look to animals and plants to find new ways of living honorably. They do not see honor as a finite resource. Second, Dan argues that white Americans use language to their advantage in several ways, weaponizing it as a tool of oppression. For example, forcing indigenous people to sign treaties in English, a foreign language, meant they didn’t always understand the deals they were making. Prohibiting the use of indigenous languages in Industrial Schools traumatically separated indigenous children from their families and culture. In modern classrooms, the use of words like “frontier” and “wilderness” to describe indigenous lands erases the long history of indigenous communities and the lives they built and continue to build on the land. Third, Dan describes how he learned to see and speak as a white man.

Chapter 15 Summary: “Shiny Soup”

Grover drives the group into a homestead town, one of the many, white-founded towns on indigenous reservations that resulted from unjust federal policies. Initially comforted by a sense of order more familiar to him, Nerburn soon notices an air of decay in the once-prosperous town. The trio enters a decrepit café filled with a mix of indigenous and white people. When a drunk indigenous couple enters and is quickly kicked out, Nerburn asks Dan and Grover if they’re embarrassed by the historical legacy of alcohol dependence in indigenous communities. Dan describes alcohol dependence as a challenge given to indigenous communities by the Creator and suggests that white people weaponize the indigenous community’s struggles with alcohol dependence to oppress them. He argues that indigenous people lived for hundreds of years without electricity and running water, and that only white people thought that made them victims in the modern world. He asks what makes Henry David Thoreau’s adventures at Walden Pond more noble than indigenous ways of life and suggests that white people want to steal the best parts of indigenous living without respecting indigenous lives. For the first time, Nerburn is left reeling and confused by Dan’s words.

Chapter 16 Summary: “The Stranger”

Nerburn has an upsetting conversation with his wife and young son, and begins to feel as if he’s abandoning his family. Grover’s flippant response to the conversation angers Nerburn, and the group rides in silence. Suddenly, Dan tells Grover to turn towards a sign for the Sitting Bull Burial Site Monument. He explains that Sitting Bull was a great leader who surrendered in order to protect his people. Sitting Bull knew that the treaties he was being asked to sign would not protect his people and thus, he rejected them. Grover spots a young indigenous man walking along the road and Dan suggests that they pick him up. As soon as the stranger enters the car, the men fall silent. Uncomfortable with silence, Nerburn asks if the man is visiting the burial site. The man asks to get out of the car. When the trio is alone, Dan admonishes Nerburn for breaking the silence. He explains that many of the indigenous people living nearby are descendants of the people who killed Sitting Bull to please powerful white Americans. He argues that the legacy of those conflicts are still present, just as the legacy of the Civil War is still present in the south.

Chapters 12-16 Analysis

This section of Neither Wolf Nor Dog demonstrates the novel’s thematic interest in The Role of Language in Oppression. Throughout this section, Dan delivers formal, solemn “talks” (155, 156) addressed directly to Nerburn’s audience of white readers. The fact that Nerburn presents these speeches in their entirety demonstrates his belief in the value of formal oration. In these formal speech scenes, Nerburn compares Dan to “a concert pianist, in full command of his powers,” standing with “a pride and a peace in his bearing” (159). These speeches transform Nerburn’s characterization of Dan from a “wily old Indian” (55) to a “great orator” (158) charged with “speaking for his ancestors, voicing the feelings of his people” (166). The inclusion of these speech scenes suggests that, like Dan, Nerburn believes formal speech has the potential to elevate ordinary people to important positions within their community.

Dan’s deliberate use of language and direct address in his speeches demonstrates the power of language in forming active, political communities. In these talks, Dan repeatedly uses the terms “you” (156, 157, 158) and “your people” (156, 158) when describing white America’s treatment of indigenous communities. This specific and repeated word choice is designed to remind the Nerburn’s chosen audience of white Americans of their connection to the historical forces of oppression in the United States. Dan’s use of this deliberately provocative language allows him to engage Nerburn and his audience directly, and he ultimately uses that connection to ask the audience to consider how they can repair historical harm and support indigenous communities. Dan’s use of language and direct address in this speech reflects his belief in language as a powerful tool in the fight for justice and freedom.

Dan’s speeches in this section directly address the use of language in oppressing indigenous people. He points to instances of oppressive language use in the past and present to show how English has been weaponized against indigenous communities. Dan explains that, from the indigenous perspective, treaties between indigenous communities and the federal government were “pieces of paper written in a language we didn’t understand and read to us by people we didn’t trust” (160). Dan argues that although they often could not read or fully understand the treaties they were signing, indigenous people were “bribed to sign them, and often, even threatened if they didn’t” (160). The existence of these English treaties gave the federal government control over indigenous land and lives, demonstrating the power of language in oppressing marginalized communities, underscoring The Lasting Trauma of America’s Violence Against Indigenous Communities.

Dan argues that deliberately harmful language remains a powerful tool for the continued oppression of indigenous people in the present. He points out specific words often used to describe similar historical events depending on the subject, using the word massacre as a prime example: “whenever the white people won [battles] it was a victory. Whenever we won it was a massacre” (161). Dan notes that the use of the word massacre to describe indigenous victories over white opponents “makes our killing seem uglier than yours, so it makes our people seem worse than yours” (161). Similarly, the use of the word frontier to describe the point in the American west “where civilization stopped” implies that “everything on the other side of that line was uncivilized,” including the indigenous people who lived there (163). These examples demonstrate the power of language in shaping oppressive perspectives on history.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text