logo

61 pages 2 hours read

Yuval Noah Harari

Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks from the Stone Age to AI

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Role of Change in History

Yuval Noah Harari is a historian. By his own admission, he is neither a scientist nor specialized in anything with regards to artificial intelligence. As a result, Nexus is a book about artificial intelligence in which the new technology is situated within broader historical contexts. Harari wants to highlight the way in which humanity’s relationship to AI is the latest chapter in an ongoing narrative about human social progress rather than an entirely new development, thereby highlighting the role of change in human history.

Harari suggests that the only constant of history is change. Society changes regularly, often influenced by new technologies. While he concedes that AI is fundamentally different from previous technologies, as it has the capacity to create content rather than just represent it, he believes that this is simply a variation on previous changes rather than something new and terrifying. A key element of this argument is his repeated refrain that technology is “seldom deterministic” (226). Technology changes, but humanity is not beholden to these changes, nor to these new technologies. Instead, Harari believes that the changing nature of society imbues humanity with a responsibility to comprehend and master each change in a way that fully reflects human intention and agency. 

The final chapters and the Epilogue are fundamental to Harari’s rejection of determinism. He does not believe that humanity should be governed by a sense of hopelessness or fatalism. AI might be powerful, but Harari argues that there is no fate but that which humanity makes for itself. This turns the final chapters into a call for action, in which Harari looks away from the past and increasingly toward the future. There are apocalyptic visions of a dystopian society ruled by AI, but Harari does not dwell on these. He does not aim to frighten his audience; he wants to inform them. Since humanity retains control over society and technology, humanity is in a position to navigate this moment of historical change. 

Harari emphasizes that humanity is capable of working together to ensure that the future is not dystopian. AI is not novel in this respect; it is the latest iteration in a constantly evolving, constantly changing society that has been developed and maintained by humans. This is why Harari emphasizes the importance of self-correcting mechanisms (see below) and human oversight of AI on both a national and international level. Only by working together, Harari suggests, can this change be for the better.

The Importance of Self-Correcting Mechanisms

Harari advocates for the importance of self-correcting mechanisms throughout the book. According to Harari, these self-correcting mechanisms can be defined as any tool within a system that allows people to respond to, question, and change the functionality of the given system. These self-correcting mechanisms, he believes, help society to balance the needs of truth and order, and are thus essential to a well-functioning information system. 

In countries where there is a free press, people can read, question, and occasionally challenge newspapers, which can then retract any stories that are found to be false. Since newspapers are published every day, they are able to address previous failings in a way that a fixed text like a holy book cannot. Similarly, democratic systems allow the public to exercise self-correcting mechanisms by voting out politicians who are corrupt or liars. In academia, the peer review system is built into the publication process so that all research is subject to the self-correcting mechanisms offered by feedback and oversight from other experts. These mechanisms may slow progress, and their systems are not immune to mistakes, but the presence of the self-correcting mechanisms means that the potential to course correct is always present. 

Harari contrasts systems with self-correcting mechanisms and systems without such mechanisms, showing why the former tend to be more efficient. The Bible, for example, is considered to be the infallible word of God. The text has no self-correcting mechanisms, so the power is then passed to those who interpret and create doctrines. In comparison, the US constitution contains the self-correcting mechanism of amendments, meaning that successive generations can always modify it. Enslavement, for example, was condoned by the original document, but banned by a future amendment. The self-correcting mechanism was responsible for eliminating an immoral feature of society in a way that the Bible could not do, since the Bible has no such mechanisms. In a similar vein, totalitarian regimes predicated upon the idea of an infallible leader or party can run into problems, as there is no toleration for dissent or constructive feedback on governmental issues. 

In Nexus, Harari applies the importance of self-correcting mechanisms to the emerging technology of AI. Since the fundamental social understanding of AI is still not set, Harari urges people to realize the importance of inserting self-correcting mechanisms into the laws and rules that govern AI. By doing so now, he suggests, humanity will be able to avoid future issues.

The Power Dynamics of Information Control

Throughout Nexus, Harari examines the relationship between power and information in various historical contexts. He emphasizes how controlling the flow of information can have wide repercussions for a particular society at large, and even impact individual people directly on a personal level. In these ways, Harari highlights the complex power dynamics of information control.

Harari details the rise of bureaucracy as one of the first and most important milestones in the history of information control. While small, oral-based cultures relied on human memory and direct interaction to pass down traditions and mediate social interactions, the rise of larger, more centralized states necessitated the development of bureaucratic mechanisms to organize and control information. Bureaucracy enabled the creation of complex systems of taxation, census-taking, trade, and resource allocation. While the development of bureaucracy brought many benefits, it also contained drawbacks: Harari acknowledges how bureaucratic systems often seem opaque or even sinister to those who are outside of them, while giving significant power to those who know how to navigate them.

Harari also reflects on the political uses and misuses of information control, contrasting the democratic and totalitarian approaches to information. In democratic societies, information is flexible and dynamic, flowing from many sources and often easily accessible by the public at large. A free press and rights of freedom of speech enable citizens to stay informed on political and social developments, while also creating a space for the free exchange of information and ideas. By contrast, totalitarian societies are marked by an excessive level of governmental control of information. Harari points to Stalin’s Soviet Union as an example, emphasizing how Stalin exercised strict control of the press, the education system, and the arts to ensure that only a certain type of narrative was acceptable.  

Harari also examines modern social media as a medium that has raised fresh issues surrounding information control. He argues that private social media companies exercise increasing power over information control through the use of algorithms. These profit-driven algorithms tend to deliberately cultivate engagement at the expense of truth, leading to an excess of conspiratorial and inflammatory content that can have deadly real-world consequences, such as the Rohingya massacre in Myanmar fueled by disinformation on Facebook. 

Harari addresses the implications of information control with the rise of AI as well. He argues that totalitarian regimes might be the weakest link when it comes to AI overreach, as a totalitarian system’s lack of self-correcting mechanisms and desire for total control could create an overreliance on AI without due oversight. This could lead to AI systems creating and disseminating information for reasons or by means that humans struggle to recognize or understand. Thus, since information control is a crucial yet ethically complex issue, Harari urges both individuals and governments to take regulating new forms of information flow seriously.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text