logo

37 pages 1 hour read

Plato

Phaedrus

Nonfiction | Essay / Speech | Adult

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

The Soul as a Charioteer

Socrates’s vision of the soul as a charioteer with two horses is an allegory meant to help him make his point about the double-sided nature of all human impulses. It is not quite a symbol, but rather a symbolic representation of the human tendencies he is discussing. The good horse, well-bred and obedient, represents the parts of the soul which are receptive to reason and are willing to delay instant gratification in the pursuit of some higher purpose. The bad horse, impulsive and disobedient, represents the urges for physical pleasure. The passage in which this allegory appears (Socrates’s second speech) has become the most well-known section of Phaedrus. The figure does not make another appearance before or after its original exposition in the speech, but the theme of double-ness is foreshadowed earlier in the dialogue.

Seeds, Roots, and Plants

The language of plants seems to be one of Socrates’s favorite tools for demonstrating the effects of good rhetoric in the second half of the dialogue. A good speaker is compared to someone who plants a seed to bring forth “fruit” in the mind of their audience. To produce that fruit, the speaker will, naturally, need to pay attention to the soil he plants it in (that is, the soul of his listener) and tend to it as it grows. Socrates stresses that an effective speaker knows his audience well in the way that a farmer knows the soil and his seeds well. If the farmer wants to grow a specific crop, he must plan his planting carefully; likewise, an effective speaker will plan his speech carefully and prepare his audience in such a way that the speaker will produce precisely his desired effect. The heavy use of this simile is foreshadowed by the setting of the dialogue: under a plane-tree on the banks of the Ilissus River. Such a place, Socrates notes, has very fertile soil and a comfortable climate, an ideal setting for both growing crops and Socrates and Phaedrus’s discussion.

Medicine

Socrates compares a skillful orator to an experienced doctor. Just as the doctor seeks to bring about a certain change in his patient’s body, the orator seeks to affect the soul of his listener. This comparison is especially useful in the context of his methods of “division” and “collection”: a doctor needs to understand whether or not the problem with his patient’s body is unique or whether it is common to all bodies. In the same way, an orator needs to know the specific characteristics of his present audience in order to truly influence them. Socrates’s comparison of rhetoric to medicine also gives us insight into his view of rhetoric as a “cure” for common misconceptions or injustices. Even though an experienced orator can argue effectively on both sides of an issue, Socrates seems to believe (on some level, at least) that rhetoric is best employed in a just cause.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text