35 pages • 1 hour read
Mary DouglasA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Douglas quotes the anthropologist Mircea Eliade on the purifying, regenerating, life-giving property that water has in the rituals of the world. It “purifies and regenerates because it nullifies the past, and restores—if only for a moment—the integrity of the dawn of things” (199). Douglas goes on to compare water in this respect with dirt, which has a similar symbolic force of cancellation or nullification.
Dirt symbolizes disorder and anomaly, something “out of place.” To a large degree, dirt is contextual and exists in the eye of the beholder; it is not an absolute (2). Eliminating dirt is a positive action, a way of organizing our environment. In some cultures, dirt figures in rituals of death as a symbol of nullification, dissolution, or creative formlessness.
A witch is a person possessing in his or her psyche the ability to release evil forces in the universe. Douglas sees witches as symbols of the “non-structure”—that is, anomalies that do not fit into the social order. This is why they are hated, shunned and persecuted. Joan of Arc is cited as typical in that she was anomalous in various ways—a woman in armor, a peasant at court, etc.—and was persecuted as a witch.
In primitive and tribal societies, a shaman is a person regarded as having access to the world of good and evil spirits. In Chapter 4, Douglas discusses a shamanistic cure involving “spell-binding and loosing” among the Ndembu tribe in Africa. She compares this treatment to a Freudian analytical session in that the shamanistic cure restored psychological and physical health to the subject and good order to the social relations of his community.
Webster’s College Dictionary defines Chinese boxes as “[a] matched set of boxes that decrease in size so that each box fits inside the next larger one.” Douglas uses the image of Chinese boxes to represent her view of society as a system with any number of sub-systems expressing a hierarchy of relationships. Individuals are “aware in appropriate contexts of all these structures and aware of their relative importance […] By ceremony, speech and gesture they make a constant effort to express and to agree on a view of what the relevant social structure is like” (125).