45 pages • 1 hour read
Elizabeth RushA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Rush opens Part 3 with a dispatch from the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, located in Oregon’s Central Cascades. It is one of 28 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) centers found throughout the country. These centers allow researchers to study climate change. Several centers, including the Andrews, also have Long-Term Ecological Reflections programs, where writers reside at the center for two weeks and record their responses to the same set of study sites. These writings generate a “creative record of the changing relationship between people and forests over time” (188). Rush is participating in this program.
In this chapter, Rush introduces readers to the rufous hummingbird, which is the size of a spool of thread. These birds travel 5,000 miles each year between their breeding grounds in the Pacific Northwest and their wintering grounds in marshes located in Mexico and the Gulf Coast. By 2080, this hummingbird will lose all its nonbreeding ranges in the United States. As readers have seen throughout the text, the hummingbirds are already losing some of this habitat. Rush asks, “If the rufous don’t have a place to live come January, will they return to the Andrews in May?” (190).
To better understand how changes to climate are influencing the movement of the breeding birds throughout the Andrews, researchers have set up a long-term study. One part of this study examines whether birds are already starting to seek cooler temperatures scattered throughout the Andrews. It appears that this might be the case. During one of her trips to the field sites, Rush saw two spotted owls. These owls are not a migratory bird. Instead, these shy birds spend their whole life in the Andrews. According to one of the researchers who studies the owls, the location Rush saw them in was unusual. They were at a higher elevation than previously ever recorded. It is possible that these owls might be starting to move higher up in elevation as the climate warms, seeking their preferred temperature.
This chapter represents the book’s final first-person account, told through the words of Richard Santos. Richard grew up in Alviso, California. He notes, “there was one thing all of us who lived in Alviso had in common: we were poor. Though we didn’t really know it” (206). During his youth, the town, which he calls a migrant camp, was surrounded by salt ponds and orchards and lacked major highways. It was a big melting pot with generous people.
While it was once considered “the outback,” now everyone wants a piece of the town. Richard is adamant that he will not let them build high-density housing or tech campuses. A developer even offered $4 million to Richard for his property, which he refused. He describes how the Alviso advisory board approved the development of office buildings in the town, but the company can no longer afford to build it. The company sold it to another developer who wants to put in a trucking and manufacturing distribution center, but the people of Alviso do not want this new project. Because the advisory approved of a development project, however, the City of San José gave approval for the new project, going against the townspeople’s wishes.
He believes that the wetlands restoration project will provide extra protection against flooding and help restore the wetlands to what he remembers from his youth. Richard also believes that the project will help keep Alviso out of developers’ hands. To him, the best thing about the wetlands restoration project is that it will “save the community I’ve fought so long to protect” (210).
Rising concludes with a dispatch from the Salt Pond Restoration Project, located in San Francisco Bay. This project represents the largest wetlands rehabilitation effort in the western United States. John Bourgeois, a native of Lafayette, Louisiana, and the executive project manager, tells Rush how the San Francisco estuary was “profoundly devastated and fractured” (214). Similar to many other wetlands, humans began to alter the environment to produce salt, which was a hot commodity. Laborers working for small businesses heaped dirt along the edges of the wetlands, creating salt ponds. These ponds restricted tidal flow and accelerated evaporation rates. Eventually, Leslie Salt Works bought out these small-scale outfits, controlling 44,000 acres of wetlands.
In 2003, the state of California bought these salt ponds in the hopes of trying to restore the environment. Climate change has recently complicated this project, which now involves transforming the wetlands so that they survive the changing climate. The project’s size allows John and his team to experiment with various interventions that have never been tested before in coastal wetlands. For example, they must remove the earthen embankments that separate the ponds from the bay in order to return tidal flow to the area. Prior to doing this, however, they need to build horizontal levees to restore the wetlands habitat. These levees need to be constructed prior to 2030, when sea level rise is predicted to increase significantly. John is hoping the tidal marsh will get the chance “to migrate up and in” before this climate crisis (223). As Rush notes, John is more concerned about the animal and plant species than human communities in the area because he knows humans can adapt to the changing climate.
Rush asks John, “Do you fear that you’re playing god?” (232). While John dodges the question, Rush feels uneasy about using human interventions, which destroyed the wetlands in the first place, to now try to rehabilitate them. Those working on the restoration project are trying to “conserve the stage” (239). Rather than focusing on individual species or niches, the project is trying to take into account the physical factors that form biodiversity (e.g., hydrology, soil types, and topography). By doing so, the project hopes to reconnect ecosystems across the land.
In Part 3, Rush grapples with whether humans will repair our relationships with each other and other living beings as sea levels rise. To illustrate how crucial it is that we do so, Rush spends considerable time in her dispatch from the Andrews demonstrating the interconnectedness of ecosystems. The rufous is not the only species of migratory birds that use the Andrews as their breeding ground. In fact, there are hundreds more, including lark sparrows, ospreys, nighthawks, and golden-crowned kinglets. These migratory birds, like the rufous, “travel across a transcontinental web of marshes, estuaries, wetlands, and bogs” for their feeding grounds (192). They are creatures of habit, meaning they retrace their routes and make the same pit stops year after year. Already nearly one-third of these migratory birds are at risk of extinction because of saltwater inundating their routes and pit stops. While some areas are trying to rehabilitate or preserve existing wetlands, doing so will be incredibly challenging considering we cannot stop the sea from rising. This means that more migratory birds will likely go extinct in the coming years. Migratory birds also fulfil important ecological niches in the Andrews. Rising sea levels do not just mean we are losing wetlands; we are also potentially losing migratory birds and the biodiversity that depends on them. It is possible that humans will be the only species ever that destroys entire ecosystems from our attempts to control and manipulate nature.
Rush also expresses skepticism that human interventions will repair marshes. She notes:
On the one hand, the tremendous effort that has gone into restoring and readying these wetlands for sea level rise strikes me as both unprecedented and wise; on the other, it all seems too much somehow, yet another example of first-world exceptionalism and the delusion that we can design our way out of the planetwide geophysical transformation we’ve set in motion (232).
After completing Rising, readers likely share some of Rush’s doubt in human ingenuity. A particularly poignant moment is when Rush notes to John that building levees mean the Salt Pond Restoration Project is still dumping dirt into the bay. As Rush explains in great detail, part of the reason the wetlands in California were so decimated was due to shifting dirt and cutting off tidal flow. It seems unwise and even a bit dangerous to move dirt, even with different information, when doing so is what caused untold destruction of the environment in the first place.
Throughout the text, Rush details how climate change hits impoverished and marginalized communities the hardest. In this final section, she raises concerns around whether creating resilient cities, such as San Francisco, will dismantle or exacerbate inequality. She worries that the very people who were pushed into these communities will be pushed out as they become safe havens in a new world. Rush hopes that for humanity’s sake, we will rise to the occasion and build a more equitable and just community for all.
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Climate Change Reads
View Collection
Common Reads: Freshman Year Reading
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Journalism Reads
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection