logo

54 pages 1 hour read

George Bernard Shaw

Saint Joan

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1923

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Joan of Arc

Joan is the protagonist of Saint Joan, and she falls into the narrative role of a tragic hero. George Bernard Shaw describes her in the stage directions as “an ablebodied country girl of 17 or 18, respectably dressed in red, with an uncommon face” (74). Joan speaks very directly and confidently, often using nicknames to refer to men who would be considered her social superiors. She does so not to be rude or to offend these men, but rather because she sees herself as their equal in the eyes of God. When Robert de Baudricourt accuses her of impudence for referring to Bertrand de Poulengey as “Polly,” she protests, “His friends call him so, squire: I did not know he had any other name” (76). Joan implies that she considers Poulengey a friend, rather than a superior who outranks her, and thus she uses his nickname. Joan prefers to dress in male clothing and to wear her hair cut short. She does not see this as a transgressive act of rebellion, but rather a pragmatic adjustment that better suits her role as a soldier. When Joan arrives at the French court and the Duchess laughs at her bobbed hair, the stage directions indicate that she is “not at all embarrassed” when she says, “I wear it like this because I am a soldier” (97). Joan later indicates to Dunois that she prefers being a soldier to being a woman, enjoying the excitement of battle and the opportunity to make important tactical decisions. While Joan is willing to return to wearing women’s clothing to avoid being burned at the stake, she seems reluctant to give up her military lifestyle.

 

Joan’s personality is practical and realistic, despite her mystical connection to God. In the preface, Shaw describes her as “a thorough daughter of the soil” who perceived “great lords and kings and prelates as such without idolatry or snobbery, seeing at a glance how much they were individually good for” (29). Because of her upbringing as the daughter of a successful farmer, Joan has a particular connection to the land and soil of France. This aligns with her drive to liberate her country from English control and her belief that the common people will fight for her more effectively than the aristocratic knights. Aside from hearing voices, Joan behaves in a highly rational manner, impressing the veteran soldier Dunois with her intuitive knack for military command.

However, as a tragic hero, Joan possesses one fatal flaw. While she is morally blameless, her inability to submit to authority when that authority is wrong eventually leads to her death. When she loses the support of the French court after Charles VII’s coronation, she reacts with disbelief and confusion. Upon being told that the English consider her to be a witch, she asks, “[B]ut why? What sense is there in it? What I have done is according to God. They could not burn a woman for speaking the truth” (136). Joan is unable to understand the political motivations of her enemies, who want her dead not because she has misled anyone but because she challenges their claim to authority. Her virtuous qualities tragically become her worst qualities, leading to her death because she cannot understand the petty motivations of her accusers.

The Dauphin, Charles VII

The Dauphin of France, later King Charles VII, is dynamic character who evolves from a petulant and apathetic young man into an effective and successful king. When the Dauphin first appears, the stage directions describe him as “a poor creature physically” with “the expression of a young dog accustomed to be kicked, yet incorrigible and irrepressible” (89). The Dauphin complains that his court disrespects him, telling Trémouille, “[Y]ou all think you can treat me as you please because I owe you money, and because I am no good at fighting” (90). His debts and his lack of military courage make the Dauphin, who is 26 at the beginning of the play, behave like a sulking child. Because his mother denies his legitimacy, he is in a vulnerable political position. He does not seem to want the responsibility of being a ruler, although he seeks to prove that he is of royal blood. He admits to Joan, “I don’t want to be a father; I don’t want to be a son: especially a son of St. Louis. I don’t want to be any of these fine things you all have your head full of: I want to be just what I am” (102). This lack of ambition has led to France’s stagnation, as the Dauphin seeks to make a treaty with the English rather than risk a battle.

However, Shaw foreshadows that the Dauphin is an intelligent person with the capacity to become an effective monarch. When Joan talks with him alone, the Dauphin displays a keen awareness of his political situation. He tells Joan, “I am not such a fool as I look. I have my eyes open” (101). The stage directions seem to confirm this, claiming that “he is neither vulgar nor stupid; and he has a cheeky humor which enables him to hold his own in conversation” (89). These positive qualities eventually enable the Dauphin to become Charles the Victorious, a successful military leader who is able to overcome his fear of the battlefield. In the Epilogue, he tells Joan, “I had to be brave because you were” (177), suggesting that he overcame his apathy and fear only because of Joan’s example. He argues that he while he does not have a reputation for being good or wise or bold, he has led a successful campaign against England and retaken all of France. He claims, “[Y]ou people with your heads in the sky spend all your time trying to turn the world upside down; but I take the world as it is, and say that top-side-up is right-side-up; and I keep my nose pretty close to the ground” (179). While Charles VII acknowledges that he will never be considered a great or revolutionary king, he has been an effective leader who has pragmatically dealt with the problem of the English invasion. Charles VII’s character transformation depicts how he finds his courage and harnesses his natural intelligence, but ultimately suggests that he does not have the innate greatness of revolutionaries and idealists like Joan.

Pierre Cauchon

Pierre Cauchon is a major antagonist of Saint Joan. He is the Bishop of Beauvais and a political supporter of the English claim to France, although he looks down on many of the English leaders. Because of his age—he is in his 60s—and his religious authority, Warwick and Stogumber respect him despite their disagreements. Cauchon appears to be a reasonable person and presents himself as an earnest and compassionate Christian. Unlike Stogumber, who makes unfounded accusations that Joan is a witch, Cauchon acknowledges that Joan is a fellow Christian and that her military victories are the result of skill rather than magic. Cauchon seeks to separate himself from the political ambitions of other clergy and aristocrats like Warwick, reminding his English allies that “[his] first duty is to seek this girl’s salvation” (118). However, Cauchon considers Joan’s death necessary unless she will submit to Church authority and repent of her heretical beliefs. Despite his rhetoric of mercy and compassion, he is unyielding and harsh when faced with the possibility of rebellion, telling his English collaborators, “[L]et her perish. Let her burn. Let her not infect the whole flock. It is expedient that one woman die for the people” (126). Cauchon remains convinced that he acted correctly, even though the outcome of Joan’s trial was upsetting to him. While the Inquisitor claims that he is used to seeing heretics being burned, Cauchon describes the execution as a “dreadful thing” (168) and hopes that they will miss seeing it.

In the Epilogue, the spirit of Cauchon appears and continues to assert that he acted correctly and faithfully, despite the fact that the outcome of the trial has been overturned and Joan is being venerated as a hero. In contrast, his dead body has been exhumed, excommunicated, and thrown into a sewer, which he sees as evidence that he was correct in recognizing the danger of her proto-Protestant beliefs. He declares, “I was just: I was merciful: I was faithful to my light: I could do no other than I did” (179). When he kneels to Joan after her canonization as a saint, he recognizes that she has accomplished exactly what he most feared: “[T]he girls in the field praise thee; for thou hast raised their eyes; and they see that there is nothing between them and heaven” (187). Cauchon serves as Joan’s major theological antagonist, refusing to be persuaded by her miracles or her honesty because he is so devoted to the Catholic Church’s authority and unity. While he has the capacity for horrific cruelty, Shaw depicts him as an honorable and honest man who is motivated by genuine conviction. Cauchon’s characterization indicates that Shaw sees persecution by fair and reasonable people to be more tragic and more frightening than persecution by corrupt criminals.

Dunois

Dunois, also called the “bastard” of Orléans, is a French military commander who serves as a mentor and ally to Joan. Dunois is 26 years old, and he is described in the stage directions as “a goodnatured and capable man who has no affectations and no foolish illusions” (105). Dunois is a skilled military commander who respects Joan’s bravery and admires her as a comrade. He admits to Joan, “I, God forgive me, am a little in love with war myself” (108), acknowledging that they both find battle to be exciting.

However, Dunois favors a more cautious approach to war, focusing on planning and resource administration more than the ideology of the conflict. Dunois teaches Joan some of his strategic knowledge about the English defensive fortifications at Orléans and he tries to help her understand her unpopularity at court. Yet he is unable to fully commit to supporting her because he doubts the reality of the divine voices she claims to hear. He respects her courage but finds her desire to lead daring charges against the enemy rash, and he sees her victories using this tactic as mere luck. He considers Joan lacking in logistical matters, remarking, “The people will run after The Maid and her miracles and not after the Bastard’s hard work finding troops for her and feeding them” (134). Dunois remains sympathetic to Joan, but he does not intervene to stop her execution, not wanting to get involved in religious affairs. In the Epilogue, Dunois admits that Joan’s ideology of “staking life against death, with the heart high and humble and void of malice, and nothing counting under God but France free and French” won them the war, instead of the old knightly manner of fighting to capture aristocratic opponents in order to ransom them for money (179). While Dunois differs substantially from Joan in his ideology of war, he is one of the few people who seems to truly like her and remains on friendly terms with her despite their disagreements about tactics.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text