116 pages • 3 hours read
Jane AustenA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
The spoiled child is a recurrent motif in Austen’s novel and symbolizes the decadence a young person falls into when they are indulged. The first spoiled child is little Harry, John and Fanny Dashwood’s infant son, who will receive the entirety of the Norland estate, thereby injuring the Dashwood sisters. Austen makes clear her disapproval of this preference for Harry by stating that the child possesses qualities that “are by no means unusual in children of two or three years old” and even the defects of “an earnest desire of having his own way, many cunning tricks, and a great deal of noise” (3). Again with understatement, Austen implies that Harry is already a menace and will grow to be more so following the sense of entitlement that possessing Norland at the expense of others will give him. Harry is a miniature of his father John, an older child spoiled by being his father’s first and only male successor and therefore in the eyes of patriarchy, his most important heir.
The young Middletons, whom Elinor and Marianne encounter at Barton Park, are also spoiled. The center of their mother Lady Middleton’s life, these children are indulged and permitted to misbehave. Lady Middleton warms to the Steeles who pander to the spoiling, while she dislikes the Dashwoods who do nothing to encourage it. Austen shows how the attitudes of marriageable girls toward children suggest the type of mother they will become and the kind of citizens they will bring into the world. The flattering Steeles view maternal spoiling as “so natural” and cluster around Lady Middleton’s screaming daughter—one bathing her wound with lavender water and the other stuffing sugar plums into her mouth (141). Austen wryly comments that “with such a reward for her tears, the child was too wise to cease crying” (139). Here, Austen implies that the Miss Steeles will be bad mothers who will raise cunning, undisciplined children. The Dashwoods, by contrast, do not seek to escalate the triviality of a child falling over; when they become mothers, they will not lose all sense of proportion and ensure that their children are disciplined and pleasant in society.
Spoiled children also feature within the younger branch of the Dashwood family. Mrs. Dashwood, who admires Marianne’s temperament for resembling her own and lives vicariously through her heady romance with Willoughby, spoils her by not reining in her antisocial capers or monitoring her intimacy with Willoughby. Mrs. Dashwood’s spoiling does not arise from the bestowal of material favor, but from the exceptions she makes for her daughter. She considers that demanding to know once and for all whether Marianne and Willoughby are engaged, as would be common for a mother at that time, “would be most ungenerous” and that she should “never deserve” her daughter’s trust again (97). Elinor considers that in her attempts to match Marianne’s “romantic delicacy,” Mrs. Dashwood neglects to apply the “common care” and vigilance that might serve Marianne’s interests in the long term (97). Similarly, Colonel Brandon indulges his ward Eliza when he allows her to go to Bath with a school friend. This visit, which sees “the girls […] ranging over the town and making what acquaintance they chose” (234), leads to Eliza’s meeting with Willoughby and her subsequent pregnancy. Eliza, a tragic parody of Marianne, expresses the full danger of indulgence and lack of supervision.
Barton Cottage and the romantic notion of cottage living are recurrent motifs in the novel. Cottages—small, cozy countryside homes—are the opposite of the grand, 18th-century stately manor. They appealed to the imagination of the Romantic period because they presented a turning away from society and superficial values.
Austen is aware that contemporary readers might interpret the Dashwood sisters’ removal to a countryside cottage as a symbol of their romantic abandonment of society and its values following their dismissal from Norland Park and endeavors to show that this is not the case. The cottage is such an integral part of the Barton Park estate that it fails the romantic requirement of seclusion. In addition, Austen wryly comments that though “compact,” Barton Cottage is unaligned with Romantic era notions of an abandoned building taken over by nature because “the building was regular, the roof was tiled, the window shutters were not painted green, nor were the walls covered with honeysuckles” (32). The structure is a solid foundation for a new life, rather than a locale of melancholy abandon.
Willoughby, however, invests in the romantic vision of the cottage when he defiantly denounces Mrs. Dashwood’s proposed reforms to improve the building’s comfort. He exclaims that “not a stone must be added to its walls, not an inch to its six, if my feelings are regarded,” thus expressing a lover’s nostalgia for the place where he met his beloved (84). He exaggerates further, boasting that “were I rich enough I would instantly pull Combe down, and build it up again in the exact plan of this cottage” (84). Elinor perceives the senselessness of this profession, pointing out the dark stairway and the smoking kitchen. This, in addition to the fact that as the cottage is deficient both in comfort and as an idyll of Romantic hermeticism, highlights Willoughby’s impulsiveness and alerts the reader to mistrust him. In the full course of events, Willoughby’s devotion to the cottage will prove as insincere as his commitment to Marianne. Not only does he not pull down Combe Magna, but he seeks a benefactress who will keep him in an ostentatious rather than simple style.
Austen further shows how a preference for cottages and Romantic hermeticism aligns with duplicity and hypocrisy in the character of Robert Ferrars. He echoes Willoughby in the statement that he would invest any extra wealth into building a cottage. However, his ideal cottage would be “a short distance of London, where I might drive myself down at any time, and collect a few friends about me, and be happy” (284). This indicates that while Robert admires the style of pastoral seclusion, his real values are more aligned with being part of fashionable urban society. It is fashion rather than feeling that causes him to be a professed cottage-lover, and his statement reveals the whimsical and superficial nature of his taste. Austen’s association of cottages with insincere characters reflects her cynicism about the Romantic movement’s influence on her society’s tastes.
The doomed first attachment is a common motif in the novel, which consistently shows how the characters’ fiery first loves end in heartbreak or indifference rather than marriage. This is the case for Colonel Brandon and Eliza, Lucy Steele and Edward Ferrars, Marianne and Willoughby, and Willoughby and Eliza Williams. This tendency runs in counterpoint to Marianne’s profession at the start of the novel that first attachments are the only valid ones and second attachments are “impossible to exist” (65). For Marianne, who wants to believe in the depth and security of romantic love, second attachments are a form of betrayal to one’s primary feelings and ideals. These pragmatic arrangements announce the troubling fact that life must go on after losing a first love. Marianne’s devotion to the primacy of a first attachment can be seen when she makes her life a relic to Willoughby. She forgoes satisfaction and society for his sake and undertakes solitary walks to remember their meetings. When one of these walks almost ends Marianne’s life, Austen shows the destructiveness of Marianne’s belief. Part of her character development is to accept that there is life after first loves and that changing your mind about who you can become attached to is an advantage.
Even prior to her experience with Willoughby, Marianne’s notion of the supremacy of the first attachment is undercut by her being the product of a second marriage. The novel’s lack of romanticism about first attachments is evident when John, the undeserving offspring of Mr. Henry Dashwood’s first marriage, triumphs in the inheritance stakes. Moreover, even as Marianne promotes the match between Elinor and Edward, she is ignorant of the fact that Elinor is Edward’s informed second choice and an improvement from Lucy, his impulsive first.
The doomed first attachment often occurs in clandestine quarters, whether in nature, as with Marianne and Willoughby or in the context of a socially forbidden union with Edward and Lucy and Colonel Brandon and Eliza. While an element of the private and forbidden makes the attachment thrilling, it cannot survive in the public institution of marriage, which relies upon pragmatic, real-world matters such as social integration and money. For Austen, such attachments are the result of “ignorance of the world” (65). Thus, they are the product of inexperience, imagination, and surging hormones rather than real compatibility. Instead, the second attachments in the novel end in marriage, developing gradually and based on a real understanding of character in harmony with the expectations of society.
By Jane Austen
Beauty
View Collection
Books Made into Movies
View Collection
British Literature
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Feminist Reads
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Romanticism / Romantic Period
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
TV Shows Based on Books
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection