logo

38 pages 1 hour read

Mychal Denzel Smith

Stakes is High: Life After the American Dream

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1 Summary: “Delusions”

Smith opens the essay by elaborating further on Donald Trump’s election, pointing out that many White liberals referred to Trump as “‘not my president,’ or as an insult to a conversation partner, ‘your president’” (21). Smith understands the reason people say this, mainly as a rhetorical move, but critiques the rationale behind the thinking here. For Smith, this mentality reveals the American tendency to overinflate the importance of the president.

Smith then explains that so much of what happens in America is based on the idea that “there must be an American monoculture to which we all belong, unsullied by the political divisions that upset the myth” (24). This idea makes it possible for all American icons and symbols, from Frank Sinatra to Oprah Winfrey to the Cowboys, to exist within one big melting pot. There is one America.

This idea of the “monoculture,” however, is a myth, according to Smith. Trump is not an outlier that exists outside of the American project, but a clear representation of America and its history. According to Smith, America has never actually been a real democracy, and insisting that it has is nothing but a delusion. This delusion also extends to the coopting of significant Black leaders from history, such as Frederick Douglass (who Donald Trump referred to in the present tense, as if Douglass were still alive) and Martin Luther King, Jr., whose message was rebranded as a triumph of American democracy.

Unqualified belief in the American project, which according to Smith has “only ever existed as a project of white supremacist heteropatriarchal capitalism” (54), is the belief in a lie. Smith proposes that America must either pursue one of two options, instead of straddling a “hypocritical middle” (48): freedom for all of its inhabitants in an unprecedented manner or a complete “embrace of its racist violence” (48). Given this bold proposition, incremental progress will not and cannot be a permanent solution.

Part 1 Analysis

In this essay, Smith develops two of the major themes evident throughout Stakes is High: the heroization of politicians versus collective calls to action, and the illusion of American democracy. The essay serves as the foundation of Smith’s central premise for the rest of the book: the idea that the American project is a myth, one that has deluded the vast majority of Americans into believing in what Smith calls an “American monoculture” (24), apolitical in nature and selective in its memory of history. By asserting that American ideals are not grounded in reality, but in aspiration, Smith calls the entire American project into question. By claiming that the American Dream is a delusion, Smith takes on the responsibility of determining what is in fact real about the United States.

One of Smith’s observations about one of America’s political realities is the obsession with the American presidency, which contributes to the belief in the delusion in the American project. Smith writes: “The president is regarded as both the leader and ultimate symbol of our nation, and as such is supposed to embody our mythical selves, not our reality” (23). By mythologizing the president, Americans downplay their own role in constructing the American experience. The problem with this mythologizing, according to Smith, is that Americans ignore the fact that “the people of this country have never truly been united, beyond the framework of idealism” (25). The specific example of Donald Trump’s presidency exposes the cracks of this belief, because Trump undermines the premise that the president should be a symbolic representative of its people.

Smith’s denunciation of the American democracy as mere illusion is exemplified by Trump’s bizarre reference to Frederick Douglass in the present tense and to White America’s coopting of Dr. King’s message. According to Smith, Douglass and Dr. King have been captured into one central narrative about America, as Douglass is now “as American as the golden retriever” (31), and Dr. King is “treated as an American triumph” (42). The American project is a myth, because even its fiercest critics become examples of its success, through a process of rewriting history in benefit of the myth.

In addition to these historical examples, Smith also contextualizes the illusion of American democracy in a contemporary context. Even if Americans fully accept the grimmest realities of its history, insisting on “flattering ourselves is part of how we ended up here” (51). Thus, while incremental progress is valuable, the necessary path for long-lasting change in America must be systemic in nature. Events such as the 2016 election, according to Smith, emphasizes the reality that America “is a country so fearful of its biggest challenges that it would rather wither away under the leadership of committed liars than face the judgment of its own history” (52). This claim, contextualized by the Trump presidency, emphasizes Smith’s belief that the myth of the American Dream is not merely a consequence of America’s troubled history, but a reflection of its ongoing inclinations.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text