91 pages • 3 hours read
bell hooksA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The landmark 1954 Brown vs Board of Education Supreme Court case made racial segregation in public schools illegal. As a result, students such as bell hooks had to leave their familiar schools and move to previously white schools. While this decision to eliminate the unequal education standards that existed under the previous “separate but equal” segregation system was hailed by many civil rights activists, for hooks, this was a painful experience because she had to give up an education where her black teachers had taught her and cared about her. Her identity was central to the classroom.
In the newly integrated classroom, hooks felt herself to be an Other. Her experience was no longer central to the classroom but was marginalized. While the classroom was ostensibly a more diverse setting with white and black students learning together, the racism of the setting ensured that only the white students were seen as central to the classroom. She learned to hate school.
Forty years after this transitional, turbulent time, hooks has seen that, while much has changed, much has stayed the same. Many students still feel like a marginalized Other in the classroom due to their experiences of racism, sexism, classism, and colonialism. hooks wants to transform the classroom. She hopes that the entire system of hierarchy that would value one race over another, one gender over another, one class over another, or one country over another, will be upended so that there can be a truly just and diverse multicultural classroom. The multicultural classroom cannot be created simply by adding students from different backgrounds into a classroom. Teaching practices must change so that each of those students feels that they have a voice, and they should use their voices to share their experiential knowledge.
hooks does not follow traditional academic formats and writing styles. Her lack of citations, footnotes, and bibliographies have caused many to criticize her work as not scholarly enough. She writes in a clear, accessible style full of stories and personal experiences that steers clear of technical, overly abstract, academic jargon is so that her writing will be accessible to a general audience and not just a narrow, academic subculture. She wants her writing to be relevant to the daily lives of those whom society has marginalized. She is less concerned with the need for academic acceptance and more concerned with the needs of those whose lives have been defined by the margins: minorities, the working class, prisoners, the oppressed. She wants someone whose lives have been relegated to the outskirts of society to be able to pick up one of her books, read it, and be transformed.
hooks’s use of plain diction appears prominently in the two interviews, one with Ron Scapp and one with herself, a playful self-dialogue. Writing in the interview format is more accessible, as the reader can “hear” the two voices in dialogue as they speak in friendly and honest conversation. She says that the interview format allows an intimacy and familiarity not possible with the essay.
She fears that much of feminist theory has become so abstract and difficult to understand that it ends up shutting out those who most need it. She also cautions against an anti-intellectual backlash that says that all theory is worthless. She sees the need for theory in everyday life because theory allows one to question, understand, and challenge the various systems of oppression. When she discovered theory in college, she found a way to connect her feelings of alienation in the classroom to the larger global struggle, connecting to the experiences of the marginalized peasants that Paulo Freire wrote about.
For theory to be relevant, it must be accessible, but it also must be tied to practice; otherwise, it is useless. She has seen too many people pay lip service to ideas but then they have not followed through and committed to such ideas through their actions. One strategy that hooks has relied on to put theory into practice is having every student in the classroom write a short paragraph and read it aloud so everyone’s voices can be heard and recognized. This practice of hearing every voice allows a diversity of experiences to be recognized and affirmed.
Only when theory is combined with practice (praxis) will the traditional paradigm of the classroom be overturned and the practice of freedom can prevail. In addition, such daily reflection and practice have the power to move beyond the academy and transform spaces beyond the classroom, so that theory can truly become a lived reality for all.
When hooks was bussed to her integrated high school, she suffered the trauma of being marginalized and made into an Other. She was forced to confront the racism of some teachers and students. Her identity was no longer affirmed, as it had been in her beloved black school. It was this trauma that she needed to heal from. Her discovery of the works by Paulo Freire, as well as her experience in feminist classrooms in college, allowed her to start the healing process.
hooks is able to see the wounds of so many students, who have similarly been made to be an Other in the classroom. To transform the classroom and help these students, the professor must first heal herself. She must be self-actualized. Professors cannot help their students if they are hurting and trapped in their wounds, possibly enacting petty power plays in the classroom as a way to exert authority in their “mini-kingdoms” because they fear losing control of the classroom (17). The Vietnamese Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh emphasized that, before teachers can help their students grow intellectually and spiritually, they must attend to their own growth by focusing not just on the mind but also the body and spirit.
Only once the professor is healed can she turn to her students and address their diverse needs. Encountering difference and diversity in the classroom will no longer be overwhelming and threatening but an exciting opportunity for conversation and community. The classroom can transform into a space of healthy openness where all voices can be heard, ideas and experiences can be shared, fears and threats can be dismantled, knowledge can be created, and the process of healing for everyone in the classroom can be supported.
By bell hooks