61 pages • 2 hours read
Michael FinkelA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes references to confinement.
Breitwieser starts stealing in Switzerland again. On one expedition, he returns to Gruyères Castle, stealing a 10-foot-long 17th-century tapestry. He stuffs the exhibit in a duffel bag and throws it out of the castle window. Next, he visits a church in Alsace, taking his girlfriend’s more spacious car to steal a four-foot-tall statue of the Virgin Mary. Breitwieser uses a wrench to unbolt it and slowly drags it out of the church.
In the attic, there is no longer room for the large items Breitwieser acquires. The tapestry is stashed under the bed, and the Virgin Mary stands in a corner covered by other stolen items. When the wood background of some of the oil paintings begins to warp, Breitwieser superglues them back together. Accidental breakages occur in the increasingly cramped space, forcing him to throw some broken artworks away.
In November 2001, Breitwieser boasts about stealing a bugle from a Swiss museum without wearing gloves. Realizing he has been breaking her rules, Anne-Catherine is furious and insists they must go to the Richard Wagner Museum and wipe his prints from the crime scene. Breitwieser drives to the Swiss museum and waits outside while Anne-Catherine goes in. She emerges looking alarmed as two police officers approach Breitwieser and handcuff him.
Breitwieser is taken to Lucerne police station and questioned by Inspector Roland Meier. Meier initially believes Breitwieser is a petty criminal, guilty of only two art thefts. The police inspector explains that an employee at the Wagner Museum noticed the bugle’s disappearance. When Breitwieser returned to the museum and loitered outside, the employee recognized his coat from the day of the theft. Meier claims that fingerprints were taken from the scene immediately after the bugle was stolen and have been identified as Breitwieser’s. The art thief guesses the police inspector is bluffing and denies the crime. He plans to call Anne-Catherine and tell her to return the bugle anonymously while he is in custody. Breitwieser’s calm demeanor under questioning leads Meier to suspect he may be a more experienced art-thief than he first surmised. The police inspector is granted permission to hold the suspect in high-security conditions and search his home. Breitwieser is prohibited from making phone calls.
Breitwieser writes to Anne-Catherine and his mother but receives no reply. After 10 days in custody, he admits to the bugle theft, claiming that he stole it impulsively to give to his mother. Meier does not believe him. Twenty-three days after Breitwieser’s arrest, Meier and a colleague travel to France. Along with two French police officers, they go to Breitwieser’s address with a search warrant. Mireille Stengel denies any knowledge of artwork in her son’s possession. When the officers reach the attic, it contains only a four-poster bed.
After 70 days in custody, Breitwieser has still heard nothing from Anne-Catherine or his mother. Meier again questions him, producing a photograph of a 17th-century gold-plated medallion—an item Breitwieser stole shortly before the bugle theft. Meier assures Breitwieser that he will be released if he admits to stealing the medallion. Breitwieser confesses, but Meier continues to produce photographs of many other items (107 in total). Breitwieser admits to stealing them all. A French police report reveals that the items were recovered from a canal in Alsace. An expert estimated their combined value at $50 million. A few days after his confession, Breitwieser is loaded onto a prison train car with a group of other criminals.
Breitwieser is taken to a jail in Geneva, Switzerland. Here, he is questioned by art-crime detective Alexandre Von der Mühll. The police inspector builds a rapport with Breitwieser by revealing his own passion for art and complimenting the other man’s aesthetic taste. Breitwieser does not request a lawyer and provides detailed accounts of how he stole each of the items rescued from the canal. Mühll questions him about other art thefts, and Breitwieser again confesses, believing he will receive a lighter sentence for his honesty. Throughout his admission, he claims that his mother knew nothing about his crimes, while Anne-Catherine was sometimes present but opposed the thefts. Breitwieser admits to stealing 69 Renaissance paintings. He is shocked when Mühll tells him the attic has been searched and the paintings are not there.
In March 2002, Mühll sends for Breitwieser’s mother, guaranteeing her immunity from arrest. Stengel agrees to the arrangement, but Anne-Catherine ignores attempts by the Swiss police to contact her. Stengel denies knowing where the paintings are, even when her son pleads with her to co-operate. Before leaving, she warns Breitwieser not to confess to stealing the paintings.
This section of the text charts Breitwieser’s downfall. In the early chapters, Finkel explores The Psychological Aspects of Criminal Behavior as Breitwieser’s compulsion to steal supersedes his love of art. His initially discerning selection of artworks descends into kleptomania. The corruption of Breitwieser’s professed values is underlined as he steals unwieldy items, such as a huge tapestry and a near-life-size statue of the Virgin Mary. With no room to display these pieces, he is unable to appreciate them. As Finkel argues, Breitwieser’s “aesthetic ideals about idolizing beauty, treating each piece as an honored guest, have descended into hoarding” (136).
Throughout the text, the attic symbolizes the art thief’s psychological state (See: Symbols & Motifs). The author highlights Breitweiser’s increasingly obsessive mindset through the room’s deterioration from a museum into “the world’s most valuable junkyard” (137). The author returns to the theme of The Appreciation and Power of Art as he demonstrates that Breitwieser no longer treats the stolen items with respect. The damage and breakages that occur signal the art thief’s increasing carelessness. Breitwieser’s assertion that he cares for exhibits better than any museum is therefore undermined.
Finkel underlines the ironic circumstances of Breitwieser’s eventual arrest. Despite his increasing recklessness, the art thief is captured only when Anne-Catherine insists he returns to a crime scene to wipe away evidence. Under questioning, he initially retains his confidence that he can outwit the authorities. However, his preternaturally calm manner under pressure (a quality that has previously served him so well) raises suspicions that he is more than just a petty criminal. The narrative traces how Breitwieser’s sense of control over events is gradually worn away as he cannot communicate with Anne-Catherine or his mother and has no knowledge of events in the outside world. When Breitwieser finally surrenders and admits to his crimes, Finkel conveys the extent of his defeat through a chess metaphor: “For the first time in his life, he has no moves left. It’s checkmate” (152). The art thief’s sense of superiority faces another blow when he finds himself in the company of other criminals. Having previously prided himself on greater refinement than other thieves, he realizes that his genteel tastes and manner make him wholly unsuited to prison.
In recounting Breitwieser’s interviews with Inspector Von der Mühll, Finkel uses familiar tropes from detective fiction. Determined to manipulate Breitwieser, the police inspector exploits The Appreciation and Power of Art that they share. Taken in by Von der Mühll’s empathetic manner, Breitwieser drops his defenses, voluntarily providing detailed accounts of his crimes. The art thief’s ultimate loss of control is signaled by his discovery that the stolen artworks are no longer in his attic. The question of what his mother has done with the valuable collection is as much a mystery to him as it is to the investigating police officers.