64 pages • 2 hours read
Philip PullmanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
At its heart, La Belle Sauvage is a coming-of-age story as young Malcolm moves into adolescence and begins to lose his childhood innocence. In Pullman’s fantasy world, the strictly oppressive Magisterium views growing up and leaving innocence behind as a movement into sin. However, Pullman rejects this assessment and illustrates instead the beauty of growing up and the complexity gained in experience, especially the increased capacity for love.
At the beginning of the novel, 11-year-old Malcolm is the picture of an innocent boy. He is kind, curious, and annoyed by girls, especially Alice, who works in the kitchen. Outside Malcolm’s safe childhood bubble, religious and secular powers battle for control of England. However, the boy is largely unaware of these forces, living in a world “where everything was interesting and happy” (33). However, through a series of events, Malcolm starts to learn about the issues and complexities in the larger world, fostering a new awareness that causes him to lose his innocence and mature.
The first of these incidents is the discovery of the acorn, which leads Malcolm to Dr. Hannah Relf. As a scholar, Hannah symbolically ushers Malcolm out of childhood by offering him access to new knowledge, both through involving him with Oakley Street and by loaning him books. Malcolm also begins to mature through his affection for Lyra, a child more innocent and vulnerable than himself who needs care and protection. He stops taking things like safety and “his mother’s endless, effortless, generous food” for granted (152), realizing that there is danger and uncertainty in the real world.
When the flood begins, Malcolm’s canoe acts as a vessel on his journey out of childhood. He is forced to take responsibility for Lyra and Alice, navigating the canoe and keeping them safe. Through this responsibility, Malcolm must learn to quiet some of his own desires, push aside unpleasant thoughts, and overcome fear, pain, and exhaustion. He also experiences a sexual awakening, noticing Alice’s body for the first time and feeling “a silent groan in his chest” when he looks at her (399). He also is exposed to a malicious side of human sexuality in Bonneville’s treatment of Alice following the Trout patrons’ advances at the tavern. While the process of growing up is difficult and often painful, Malcolm finds new strengths in himself. This strength is represented in the boy’s repeated dreams of wild dogs. The dreams are both “frightening and exciting,” and Malcolm draws on this energy when he kills Bonneville at the end of the novel. Facing the man, Malcolm imagines the pack of dogs as an energy “inside him that he [cannot] argue with or control” (425). He thinks of his love for Lyra and Alice and his need to protect them. This thought gives him the strength that he needs to strike Bonneville. Through growing up, Malcolm’s capacity for love has changed, and his new depth of emotion gives him strength and courage.
Set approximately 12 years before Pullman’s celebrated His Dark Materials trilogy, La Belle Sauvage documents the rise of the Magisterium’s authoritarian power. Over the course of the novel, this ruling branch of the Church uses violence, fear, and surveillance to become progressively more powerful. To maintain control, the Magisterium limits personal freedoms and punishes any belief or thought that contradicts the Church’s message. Through the novel, Pullman explores issues of intolerance and the danger of regimes that rule with absolute power.
At the start of the novel, the Church is just coming into power. Politicians like Lord Nugent, who governed openly during “a more liberal time” (14), are now forced to work in secret or fall into obscurity. It is “very dangerous to think the wrong things” (93), and those suspected of opposing the Church are often arrested without a warrant or evidence. The Consistorial Court of Discipline investigates allegations of heresy while inspiring a “sense of sickening terror” (24).
The Church is particularly concerned with limiting access to knowledge. Dr. Hannah Relf notes, for example, that there are no free public libraries in Oxford, and children like Malcolm’s “hunger for books had to go unsatisfied” (78). When the League of St. Alexander appears in Malcolm’s school, the Church further influences what the children can learn. Teachers who deviate from the Church’s beliefs are dismissed immediately, and those who stay are forced to change their lessons to suit the League and apologize publicly for making a mistake. The League of St. Alexander also shows how the Church maintains control by sowing fear and distrust among the people. Children are encouraged to report the misdeeds of their peers and families, destabilizing the integrity of the family unit and creating an environment of suspicion and uncertainty.
In a society where it is best not to “ask too many questions” (24), Malcolm is an intensely curious child, representing the inquisitiveness and creativity that is stifled in authoritarian regimes. His curiosity is generally celebrated, even among the nuns at Godstow Priory, who never chastise him for questioning the religious stories they tell. By illustrating the contrast between the “gentle sisters” in the priory and the more oppressive branches of the Church, Pullman suggests that the danger of dogmatic views comes not from religion itself but from people in power who refuse to allow for personal expression and believe in the absolute truth of a single point of view.
Throughout La Belle Sauvage, there are many forces of good and evil at play. Most simply, the oppressive forces of the authoritarian Church are set against the secular forces of science and reason. However, upon closer inspection, the line between good and evil is not always clear. As Malcolm grows up and becomes more mature, he realizes that right and wrong are more nuanced than he formerly believed in his childish innocence.
The first complexity that Malcolm tries to puzzle out is the connection between the kind nuns in the Godstow Priory and the violent, terror-inducing Consistorial Court of Discipline, both of which exist under the same Church. Labeling religion itself as evil is too simplistic, as many branches of the Church, like the Godstow nuns, are loving and tolerant. Similarly, Bonneville is a scientist who formerly researched the scientific nature of consciousness, a topic censored by the Magisterium. Malcolm also has a positive relationship with science, most clearly in his desire to learn and be a scholar, and in his relationship with Dr. Hannah Relf. However, despite his science background, Bonneville becomes the novel’s antagonist, viciously chasing Malcolm, Alice, and Lyra throughout the story. Just as the Church is not purely bad, science is not purely good.
As the novel progresses, Malcolm discovers that he must also do things that he considers “wrong” to serve a larger goal that he considers “good.” For example, he criticizes the League of St. Alexander for “sneaking,” but then worries that he is doing the same thing when he spies for Dr. Hannah Relf. Later, he and Alice struggle with guilt after believing they have killed Bonneville, even though they had to protect themselves and the baby. Malcolm even has to hurt the creature he loves most, his dæmon, when he is forced to separate from Asta to save Alice from Bonneville, resulting in Bonneville’s murder. This experience leaves him feeling “sadder, more guilty, much older” (431), even though he achieves his objective of protecting Alice and Lyra. Other characters also wrestle with the often blurry line between right and wrong. Hannah, for example, asks Malcolm to spy for her even though she simultaneously feels like she is taking advantage of his innocence and putting him in danger.
In all of these cases, the characters believe they are “on the right side” (116) and use this belief to justify their actions. This suggests that a belief system or action isn’t good or bad on its own. Rather, it exists within a complex web of context and intention that can only be understood by examining every side.
By Philip Pullman