42 pages • 1 hour read
Laura MoriartyA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Although Louise Brooks did travel to New York with a chaperone, Cora’s character, her story, and most other characters in The Chaperone are fictional. Cora is the novel’s protagonist, rather than the more dazzling Louise, and this focus gives the novel an emphasis on Cora’s personal awakening as she enters mid-life. At the beginning of the novel, Cora is conventional, restrained, and conscientious. The book’s non-chronological timeline—which mostly integrates flashbacks to Cora’s past into the 1922 story—allows Moriarty to show how Cora’s life changes and how she becomes disillusioned with many of society’s ideals. She transforms from a guarded, cautious young girl and woman to a more self-assured woman who makes choices that were considered bold at the time.
In the beginning of the book, Cora is motivated to go to New York to find out about her birth family. There’s a void in her life without this knowledge, and she connects learning about her birth parents to her own happiness. Over the course of her time in New York, she comes to believe that instead of that knowledge making her happy—her meeting with Mary O’Dell dispels this illusion—her happiness depends on her own decisions about her future. Rather than settling for a sexless but financially and physically comfortable marriage to Alan, she brings Joseph and Greta into their life; doing so helps secure her own happiness, even though she and Joseph can’t be together openly.
In general, Cora moves from believing in unquestioning adherence to social norms to the realization that some circumstances require the concealment of behavior that society would condemn. This shift is demonstrated when she keeps Louise’s secret about getting drunk in New York, when she lets other people believe Joseph is her brother, and by her continued silence about Alan’s homosexuality. Cora becomes shrewder in her behavior as the book progresses, finding ways to realize her desires without alienating society and tolerating the tension that she sometimes experiences as a result.
Cora represents a prior generation that had to confront the social changes of the 1920s. Her identification with this social group is made apparent by her clothing and appearance early in the book, as they reflect the styles of a previous generation. However, unlike some of her Wichita peers, who resist changes such as racial equality, women’s sexual agency, and the reintegration of alcohol following Prohibition, Cora comes to support the progress of her era. This outward transformation (Cora publicly and openly supports these changes) mirror her inward transformation (privately, she subverts social norms). In this way, Louise’s ideals begin to influence Cora. Cora then influences Louise in later life.
Louise and the Brooks family are the only characters based closely on their historical counterparts, and Louise acts as an important foil for Cora. She is a young, energetic dancer who is enthralled by the arts, rebels against social convention at almost every opportunity, and has adopted avant-garde mannerisms and fashion. Cora is aware of Louise’s short haircut, short skirts, and low-cut blouses, all of which indicate a disregard for the ideals of traditional feminine beauty and sexual purity espoused by previous generations. Louise is described as quite beautiful and is aware both of her beauty and her dancing talent, possessing a confidence that sometimes strays into arrogance.
Louise hopes to become famous and cosmopolitan as a dancer and actress and longs to leave Kansas behind. She eventually attains her goal when she is asked to become a permanent part of the Denishawn dance company. Throughout the book, she uses her sexual appeal to gain attention and favors, and she disdains the feelings of those she considers “provincial” (unsophisticated or overly conventional), including Cora. She can be self-absorbed and self-centered, lacking empathy for others. Her relationships with her siblings and father seem functional, but her relationship with her mother, Myra, is overwhelmingly hostile, as Myra takes out her frustration and bitterness about her own unrealized artistic dreams on her children, particularly Louise.
Louise’s cynical, provocative demeanor sometimes protects her from scrutiny or from betraying vulnerability, as when she repeatedly brushes off Cora’s inquiries about religion and Sunday school. Later, when her inhibitions recede in her drunken state and she tells Cora about her sexual molestation as a child, it becomes clear that she was guarded about the subject of church and religion because she associates these things with behavior that she knows society would not approve of and that she feels some shame about.
Louise is a relatively static character whose qualities do not change over the course of the book. Despite her static nature, she represents the sweeping changes of a younger generation in the 1920s. In her later career, her character also serves as a reminder of the fast-changing nature of show business and popular entertainment as she is left behind in the era of the “talkies.” This discrepancy is ironic because Louise appears as a trailblazer early in the novel.
Alan is a successful, well-liked lawyer. Though better-educated than Cora and possessing more social capital than her at the beginning of their marriage, Cora quickly becomes integrated into Wichita society and becomes a successful part of it. The early discrepancy, however, bothers Cora in hindsight when his homosexuality is revealed.
Alan is kind and calm and represents conventional values in many ways—with the notable exception of his sexuality, which was considered “deviant” at the time. His illicit relationship with Raymond and his struggles with his sexuality bring him pain and trauma as much as they bring him pleasure, at least early in the book. His conventional, prosaic personality is at odds with his sexual needs. Later, he and Cora come to the tacit agreement that having lovers while remaining married to each other is acceptable. This agreement cements Alan’s bond with Cora, with whom he has shared parenting and the non-sexual aspects of married life. This bond allows them to have a relatively conflict-free middle- and old-age life together, as both he and Cora learn to tolerate the discrepancies between social expectations and their desires.
Joseph’s role as a relative newcomer to American society gives him a distance from American ideals that makes him a foil to Alan. He considers himself a loyal American but was held at an internment camp during World War I because he refused to swear a loyalty oath on demand. His sense of dignity and self-possession are insulted by this demand, so he bears the consequences of his action.
There are other differences between Alan and Joseph: Joseph does not seem to possess much education when Cora first meets him. He ran his own beer garden before going to the internment camp, performs physical jobs at the orphanage, and has a simply furnished apartment that indicates a modest lifestyle. Cora and Alan, meanwhile, are at the top tier of Wichita society and have ample financial comfort, as made evident by Cora hiring a cleaning woman, her Model-T car, and their large, stylishly furnished house. However, Cora’s own modest origins align with Joseph’s social status, another sign that they are compatible in many ways despite their surface-level differences. Joseph’s character emphasizes physicality and straightforwardness. He is not duplicitous, making his desire for Cora clear as soon as she tells him about Alan’s homosexuality; not only does he not suppress his desires, but he also communicates them when he senses that she won’t object.
Although he doesn’t seem to be upwardly mobile at the beginning of the story, Joseph eventually gains a more prestigious job at the Boeing factory in Wichita. He remains firmly in the physical realm (rather than Alan, whose law work is more intellectual) as he engineers airplanes. He’s characterized as a good listener and devoted to his daughter, Greta.
Mary and Myra serve as antagonists in the story through their negative relationships with their children. Mary abandons Cora physically, when she leaves her as a baby in New York, and again emotionally, when she treats their encounter merely as a chance to satisfy her curiosity about Cora. She’s not interested in pursuing any other kind of relationship with Cora or with her grandchildren, Cora’s sons. There are similarities between mother and daughter, however, including physical similarities such as facial features and handwriting. Mary is portrayed as stylishly dressed in a respectable, matronly style that Cora appreciates because it is how she herself dresses. Mary’s wedding ring indicates that her husband is well-off, just as Cora’s indicates that Alan is.
Myra is not merely distant with her children, refusing to cultivate a loving relationship with them, but is actively hostile to them. She makes her own failed ambitions the center of her relationship with them. Later, she leaves her husband and children to pursue a writing career in Chicago, basing her reputation on being Louise Brooks’s mother as Louise’s fame takes off. She’s forced to return when Louise’s success declines, and hers by connection. She’s portrayed as distant both to her children and to acquaintances (declining to answer her door when inconvenient, for example), slightly disheveled, and unconventional, but with a taste for fine clothing and a sense of her own physical beauty.
Both these women emotionally scar their children by their absences and emotional withholding. Cora and Louise are linked by the trauma inflicted by their mothers, although Cora manages to overcome it somewhat when she is adopted by the Kaufmanns. Louise, however, seems unable to express or acknowledge the pain and sorrow she feels at being the object of her mother’s hostility and resentment, and she adopts a cool, self-possessed manner to hide her inner feelings.