38 pages • 1 hour read
Michael Bungay StanierA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Bungay Stanier references consultant Peter Block’s two books, Flawless Consulting (1981) and The Answer to How is Yes (2001). Citing Block, he suggests that taking ownership and responsibility for one’s desires is often challenging. He says the question “What do you want?” is at the heart of this book. While this question seems obvious at first, Bungay Stanier argues it can be difficult to articulate wants. Often, what people want is left unspoken. The responsibility of truth rests on both the questioner and recipient of a question. Even when both parties have equally expressed and heard their wants, there remains the possibility of disconnect. Bungay Stanier believes the best way to resolve this disconnect is to understand the difference between wants and needs. He recommends that managers try to see the need behind an answer about wants. He offers research conducted by psychologist Marshall Rosenberg, which states that all needs can be classified into nine categories: “affection, creation, recreation, freedom, identity, understanding, participation, protection, subsistence” (115). Rosenberg asserts that wants are more superficial than needs. Bungay Stanier provides scenarios for practical context. For example, someone who says “I want to leave early today” might actually be expressing a need for understanding (115). Recognizing the need behind a want can help managers better understand what drives employees.
Using neuroscience, Bungay Stanier highlights the basics of how the brain discerns whether a situation is safe or not. He argues that understanding this science can help people become better leaders, and then starts a discussion of the risk-reward system in the brain: When people feel safe, they are more productive, creative, and willing to engage (reward), but when they feel threatened, they tend to pull away (risk). Therefore, a coach should make the coached feel safe. The way to do this is to increase what Bungay Stanier refers to as the TERA quotient: Tribe, Expectation, Rank, and Autonomy. Asking “What do you want?” is an effective way to increase this quotient, which can then lead to more productive conversations. It is especially effective at elevating the sense of being a tribe, a team, and framing expectations as non-threats. It also increases rank and autonomy by allowing employees to have a say.
In the workbook section, Bungay Stanier presents a suggestion for a trigger one might recognize, when conversations get stuck. He encourages the reader to replace the habit of assuming others’ wants by asking questions directly. The “From the Box of Crayons Lab” section introduces a school of psychotherapy known as solution-based therapy, and what the school refers to as the miracle question: “Suppose that tonight, while you’re sleeping, a miracle happens. When you get up in the morning tomorrow, how will you know that things have suddenly got better?” (126). This miracle question corresponds to “What do you want?” because it also pulls “people to the outcome” (126).
Bungay Stanier alerts managers to the fact that asking the book’s seven questions might be met with silence, which generally means the other person is thinking things over. He discusses the importance of waiting for responses, and urges managers to become comfortable with this silence. Many times, people become uncomfortable with silence, and in order to break it, they will speak, which steals the trajectory of a conversation. Bungay Stanier recommends that managers take a deep breath and try to remain quiet for three seconds.
Bungay Stanier states that “at the heart of this book is this simple but potent question, ‘What do you want?’”(112)—reinforcing the importance of reciprocal conversations. He also examines how conversations, while perhaps well-intended, can take turns toward the ineffective or even futile. He argues that people want a challenge, and that it can be challenging to articulate desires. Bungay Stanier says, “What we want is often left unsaid […] Sometimes the responsibility for that rests with you […] Sometimes the responsibility for unheard requests rests with the people you’re asking” (112). He avoids ascribing blame to either party of a dialogue, whether manager or employee, for the inability to express needs. He suggests that “[t]he illusion that both parties to the conversation know what the other party wants is pervasive, and it sets the stage for plenty of frustrating exchanges” (113). This illusion impedes Effective Communication, again one of the book’s themes. Both manager and employee should strive to communicate directly. Managers in particular should refrain from making assumptions about how a conversation should or will proceed. They have to maintain a neutral tone, and avoid giving advice by default. Again, a hallmark of effective communication is mutual understanding. Asking “What do you want?” leads to conversations conducive to mutual understanding.
Bungay Stanier cites research findings from neuroscientist Evan Gordon, who states “The fundamental organizing principle of the brain […] is the risk-and-reward response” (118). Humans are hardwired to scan their surroundings and make split-second decisions as to whether a situation is risky or safe. As this idea applies to conversations, a manager should do what they can to give their employee a sense of safety so conversations can unfold in a natural, beneficial way. Therefore, “What do you want?” reinforces the theme of Fostering Meaningful Conversations. Bungay Stanier calls this question the foundation question, as it is direct and pulls “people to the outcome” (126). A coach is meant to guide employees toward a destination, which could include problem-solving or another skill. They should use the foundation question to empower employees rather than determine answers for them. This adheres to the developmental method of coaching that fosters long-term growth.
When conversing, silence is always a possibility, and effective leaders should learn to accept it rather than interrupt it. Silence should not be cause for impatience, rather, Bungay Stanier advises, “Bite your tongue, and don’t fill the silence. I know it will be uncomfortable, and I know it creates space for learning and insight” (129). Effective communication relies on learning to navigate silence and view it as a potential positive.