logo

61 pages 2 hours read

David A. Ansell

The Death Gap: How Inequality Kills

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2017

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2, Chapters 6-8Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2: “Trapped by Inequity”

Part 2, Chapter 6 Summary: “Fire and Rain: Life and Death in Natural Disasters”

Chapter 6 examines how natural disasters like the Chicago heat wave of 1995 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005 temporarily brought the hidden struggles of high-poverty neighborhoods into the public eye, exposing the underlying social inequities.

During the 1995 Chicago heat wave, temperatures soared to record highs, causing severe strain on the city’s infrastructure. Emergency services were overwhelmed as hospitals—particularly those serving the poorest communities— became overcrowded. Over 700 people died, primarily in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty. Many victims were elderly, isolated, and lived in poorly- ventilated homes. The inadequate housing and social isolation aggravated the disaster’s impact.

Ansell points to the fact that Chicago’s lack of emergency measures, such as cooling centers and door-to-door checks in high-risk areas, revealed a failure to protect its most vulnerable residents. As the death toll rose, city officials deflected blame onto the victims, arguing that these deaths were due to natural causes or neglect by the individuals themselves, rather than addressing the systemic issues that had left them so vulnerable.

Nevertheless, Steve Whitman, an epidemiologist with the Chicago Department of Health, conducted a detailed analysis of the heat wave deaths. His investigation revealed that the mortality rate was significantly higher in Black neighborhoods of concentrated poverty. Whitman’s work illustrated the role of social factors like racism and poverty in these deaths, rather than attributing them solely to individual frailty.

Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in 2005 and similarly exposed deep-rooted social inequities. The city’s poor, predominantly Black neighborhoods suffered the most, as many residents lacked the means to evacuate. The inadequate emergency response plan left thousands stranded in the Superdome, facing squalid conditions and delayed evacuations. The media’s portrayal of these Black residents as looters further reinforced harmful stereotypes and diverted attention from the systemic failures at play.

As Ansell notes, Katrina’s aftermath revealed that many deaths were preventable. The disaster response was hampered by poor planning and execution, reflecting a disregard for the needs of the city’s most vulnerable populations. Post-disaster, the rebuilding efforts were uneven, with predominantly Black neighborhoods seeing far less reconstruction compared to wealthier areas.

Both the Chicago heat wave and Hurricane Katrina serve as examples of how environmental disasters can expose and aggravate existing social inequalities. These events highlight the failure of emergency management plans to account for the vulnerabilities of impoverished, racially-segregated communities. Ansell argues that to truly mitigate the impact of such disasters and close the death gap, there must be a significant reinvestment in neglected communities.

Part 2, Chapter 7 Summary: “Mass Incarceration, Premature Death, and Community Health”

Chapter 7 highlights the large-scale absence of Black men from communities due to premature death and imprisonment. Ansell notes that in many urban Black neighborhoods, there is a significant gender imbalance due to high incarceration rates and premature deaths from conditions like heart disease, cancer, and violence. For instance, in Chicago, the incarceration rate in Black neighborhoods is 40 times higher than in white neighborhoods.

Ansell frames incarceration as a tool of racial and social control, affecting predominantly Black and Latino communities. The rise in incarceration rates over the last five decades, despite dropping crime rates, highlights the disconnect between crime and imprisonment. Instead, aggressive policing, stringent drug laws, and harsh sentencing have disproportionately targeted Black communities.

From a health perspective, Ansell discusses how prisons are detrimental to individual wellbeing due to higher rates of infectious diseases like HIV and hepatitis C, mental health issues, and chronic conditions exacerbated by the prison environment. Upon release, former inmates face significantly higher mortality rates, primarily due to drug overdoses, heart disease, and violence.

The impact of mass incarceration extends to families and communities. The removal of large numbers of men disrupts family structures, leaving women to bear the burden of caregiving for returning ex-offenders who often experience substance misuse disorder, mental illness, and infectious diseases. This burden contributes to poor health outcomes for caregivers, who report high rates of smoking, hypertension, anxiety, and depression.

The absence of men in these communities also has social and economic repercussions, contributing to high poverty rates and the lack of stable family units. Children with incarcerated parents face increased risks of future imprisonment and poor health outcomes. This cycle of disadvantage is illustrated by the limited aspirations of children in these neighborhoods, who often see prison or early death as inevitable.

To address these issues, Ansell argues that ending mass incarceration is crucial. The current system of racial and social control through imprisonment perpetuates poverty and poor health in disadvantaged communities. Reforming this system and investing in these communities is essential to improving overall health outcomes and life expectancy in America.

Part 2, Chapter 8 Summary: “Immigration Status and Health Inequality: The Case of Transplant”

Chapter 8 discusses the difficulties of around 21 million noncitizen residents, among which are 11 million undocumented immigrants, to access health insurance due to long-standing public policies. Ansell tells the story of Sarai, a 25-year-old undocumented immigrant diagnosed with Wilson’s disease, a rare inherited condition that leads to liver failure. Sarai’s mother, Victoria, recounts how they were denied a liver transplant at multiple hospitals due to Sarai’s immigration status and lack of insurance. Despite Victoria securing health insurance, the barriers persisted, and Sarai eventually died because she could not get the life-saving treatment she needed.

The narrative then shifts to Roberto, a 42-year-old man with kidney failure who moved to Illinois to receive dialysis treatments unavailable to the uninsured in Texas. Roberto’s experience in emergency rooms, where he was treated with disdain by the medical staff, exemplifies how structural violence manifests in the healthcare system, where policies and attitudes prevent marginalized individuals from receiving necessary care.

Ansell critiques the role of healthcare workers who, rather than challenging unjust policies, often become the enforcers of these systemic barriers. He underscores the failure of medical professionals to adhere to the principles of the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, which aimed to ensure equitable access to transplants based on medical need, not financial capability.

Ansell recounts the story of a community-led protest organized by Father Jose Landaverde, who was advocating for equitable healthcare access for undocumented immigrants. The protests, hunger strikes, and public demonstrations led to increased awareness and, eventually, legislative changes. Ansell describes his involvement in facilitating dialogue between community leaders, healthcare providers, and political representatives, which resulted in some undocumented patients finally receiving the transplants they desperately needed.

However, Ansell emphasizes that while these steps are significant, they are not sufficient. True health equity requires comprehensive and universal access to healthcare for all, regardless of citizenship status.

Part 2 Analysis

Chapters 6 to 8 examine the systemic issues that once again reflect Environmental and Social Determinants of Health Disparities. Ansell highlights, in Chapter 6, how affluent white Americans are often insulated from the severe impacts of structural violence, rarely encountering the suffering prevalent in high-poverty neighborhoods. This insulation is disrupted when natural disasters, such as the Chicago heat wave of 1995 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005, temporarily expose the hidden struggles of these communities.

Ansell emphasizes how the media and popular narratives describing these disasters and their impact remain entrenched in racial stereotypes, often depicting Black residents as looters or unwilling to move from the face of a disaster. Ansell also criticizes the institutional response, both in preparing the population ahead of the imminent disaster and in their response after the disaster:

Despite the lack of preparation on the local, state, and federal levels, after the disaster hit national officials blamed those who failed to evacuate as ‘getting what they deserved.’ In response to rising death tolls, Federal Emergency Management Agency director Michael Brown told Congress, ‘That’s going to be attributable a lot to people…who chose not to leave.’ Structural violence had claimed another victim: basic human empathy (84).

Ansell’s critique exposes the interconnection between discourse and real-life impact, especially when the ones impacted do not have the power to respond. The narratives that blame the poor for their “choice” are not neutral, detached evaluations of societal behaviour, as Ansell points out. The choice of the officials’ words following a catastrophic situation perpetuates a blame-the-victim strategy, further insulating the wealthy white community and the political class from the impoverished neighborhoods that bear the brunt in natural disasters.

Another important factor perpetuating the cycle of impoverishment, hardship, vulnerability, and poor health is mass incarceration. Ansell makes a case for a societal shift in how race, poverty, and health are viewed and addressed in the US, focusing his argument on the impact that mass incarceration has not only on the inmates’ health but on the health of the entire community. The high incarceration rates of Black and Latino men of working age results in a stark gender imbalance in urban black neighborhoods, with significantly fewer men in their prime working ages due to premature death and imprisonment. Prisons have a negative impact on the inmates’ health. Moreover, upon release, former inmates experience significantly higher rates of mortality, hearth disease, and violence, burdening their families and especially overloading the women in the community with the responsibility of caretakers.

Ansell’s description of this vicious cycle shows, from the perspective of a doctor, how the health of an entire community is tied to the injustices perpetuated by mass incarceration and other systemic issues. The instability that mass incarceration produces at the community level highlights the urgent need for comprehensive reforms that address these interlinked social determinants of health. By combining particular cases with the analysis of how the system works to destabilize impoverished communities, Ansell advocates for a more equitable society that promotes health and wellbeing for all its members.

Ansell also addresses the significant impact of immigration status on health outcomes, offering a new angle on Healthcare as a Human Right VS Commodity. Ansell uses the story of Sarai, an undocumented immigrant denied a life-saving liver transplant due to her lack of insurance, to illustrate the systemic injustice faced by noncitizens in accessing healthcare. Giving further examples of immigrant or undocumented patients who have, after great efforts, obtained the medical care they needed, Ansell emphasizes that true health equity requires comprehensive and universal access to healthcare regardless of citizenship status. Ansell calls for a societal shift towards empathy, solidarity, and structural changes to dismantle the systemic barriers contributing to the death gap, advocating for health equity as a fundamental human right.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text