62 pages • 2 hours read
Peter WohllebenA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Trees have a symbiotic relationship with fungi, which are neither plant nor animal. Fungi cannot make their own food through photosynthesis, and their cell walls consist of chitin, a substance that is found in insects. As such, they are dependent on their “organic connections” with things that they can eat (50). Wohlleben clarifies that not all fungi are beneficial to trees; some are parasites that kill trees by living and feeding on them. Over time, underground networks of fungi called “mycelium” can become huge, occupying the soil under hundreds of acres of land (50). The author notes that this ability makes them the “largest living organisms in the world” (50). When trees want to partner with a beneficial fungus they must keep their roots hairs open so that the threads of fungi can grow into them.
Once they are connected, the fungi function as an extension of the tree roots, enabling them to reach out further and acquire more nutrients and water, and connect with neighboring fungal networks. The fungi will also help keep the tree healthy by filtering out pollutants and heavy metals and by countering harmful bacterial or fungal attacks. Fungi also benefit from this partnership. They receive sugar and carbohydrates from their host tree, sometimes taking as much as one third of the tree’s food (51). It is common for trees to partner with multiple types of fungi so that if one dies, it has others to work with. Wohlleben then argues that fungi likely want to partner with different types of trees to ensure forests maintain genetic diversity. This way, if disease kills off one type of tree, there would be others they could live on.
Wohlleben examines trees’ relationships with woodpeckers and wood boring beetles. He observes that woodpeckers can have both positive and negative effects on trees by ridding them of parasitic insects (e.g., the wood boring beetle) but can cause a lot of damage as they do so.
Wohlleben claims that trees’ “water transport” has been under researched for decades since many scientists offer “simplistic explanations” of this seemingly straightforward phenomenon. The author then examines capillary action, transpiration, and osmosis, the three ways trees can move water from their roots to their branches.
In capillary action, trees’ narrow roots help water “rise against gravity” (56). However, even in very narrow roots this phenomenon could only propel the water three feet high. The author then explains that transpiration, when the tree exhales moisture through its leaves or needles, also helps transport water by creating suction that draws water up from its roots. Finally osmosis helps move water in trees’ leaves and roots, because the water will naturally flow to more sugary neighbor cells.
Here Wohlleben examines a mystery in trees’ movement of water. He observes that trees’ water pressure peaks in the spring, noting that by applying a stethoscope to a tree’s trunk you can even hear the water moving upwards. However, the forceful movement of water at this time of year has not been fully explained. The author rules out transpiration since deciduous trees do not yet have leaves and cannot transpire, and capillary action only moves the water three feet. Osmosis would also not be responsible, since it is only effective in the tree’s leaves and roots. The author admits that scientists know little about this phenomenon, but shares that researchers listened to trees’ trunks and heard a “soft murmur” at night, when trees are very full of water. They attributed these murmurs to the presence of carbon dioxide bubbles in the trunk’s water transport tubes. Wohlleben ends this chapter by concluding that scientists may have to completely rewrite their theories of trees’ water transport once more research is conducted.
In this chapter, Wohlleben focuses on tree bark. He begins by explaining how, just like human skin, bark holds in its fluids and other contents, blocks harmful pathogens from entering its system, and lets out and absorbs moisture and gasses from the air.
The author furthers this explanation by noting that just as humans shed skin cells and grow new ones, trees also shed their bark and continually repair and expand it. Some species flake more than others, and as they age trees’ bark develops wrinkles as well. Wohlleben writes that all trees begin their lives with smooth bark which then wrinkles over time, beginning from the bottom of the trunk. The author notes that birch trees, oak trees, pine trees and Douglas fir trees wrinkle quite young, while silver firs and beech trees remain smooth for longer. He shares that the UV radiation from sunlight can cause trees to wrinkle more substantially, similar to its effect on human skin. Because these wrinkles are a natural and predictable aspect of trees’ aging process, observing bark is another way to determine age. Wohlleben concludes his survey of bark by revealing that it can also be affected by certain pests and diseases, such as bark flies or bacteria.
The author then informs the reader about old trees’ unique contributions to the forest. He cites a study by Dr. Zoe Lindo who examined old growth Sitka spruce trees in British Columbia that were over 500 years old. She found that over these trees’ mossy branches had been colonized by blue-green algae, which absorbed nitrogen from the air. When rainfall caused this nitrogen to fall to the soil, it fertilized the roots of these old trees and the younger trees around them.
According to Wohlleben once a tree has reached a certain age, which could vary from one hundred to three hundred years depending on the species, its new growth is extremely short. Old trees also stop growing in height and only expand in width. As they reach the end of their lives they cannot maintain their outermost twigs, which become brittle and are swept away by the winds, followed by the rest of their branches. Wohlleben explains that after parasitic fungi have successfully invaded these open wounds, it will consume the tree’s stored sugar or even its cellulose and lignin. Eventually, this weakened structure will collapse, though the author hints that even dead trees will remain a productive part of the forest ecosystem for hundreds more years.
While trees are capable of cooperation, some will compete and try to weaken their neighbors. Beech trees in central Europe will “harass other species, such as oak, to such an extent that they weaken” (68). Because Beech trees are dominant in central European forests, their seedlings sometimes encroach upon an oak’s growing space, slowly crowding it out and claiming its spot in the sunlight. Panicked, the oak then sprouts new shoots and leaves at the bottom of its trunk, trying to create more opportunities for photosynthesis. This doomed strategy leads Wohlleben to ask if the oak—considered to be possess great strength—is a “wimp”?
The author transitions to examining Oak trees’ incredible strength and resilience when they grow away from such tough competition. He notes that while beech trees can live only a couple hundred years in isolation, the resilient oak can live for over five hundred years. They can also recuperate from storm damage because of their tannins, which repel the harmful bacteria and fungi that try to invade their exposed wood. Oaks can even regrow branches that were torn away by storms. Wohlleben shares that in the forest he manages, oaks prove their resilience by growing in the most deprived conditions.
Wohlleben continues to use detailed examples to educate readers about his subject. When discussing trees’ symbiotic relationship with fungi, he helps readers understand why both organisms enter into this partnership by providing clear illustrations. For example, he writes that fungi “demand payment in the form of sugars and other carbohydrates, which their partner tree has to deliver” (51). He also explains how the partner tree receives important services from the fungi. Wohlleben again compares the trees’ fungal network to a “forest internet” (51) to help readers understand its function and importance, and offers more details about its benefits.
When explaining that fungi can absorb harmful pollutants that would kill trees, Wohlleben gives the example of the radioactive element cesium, which was released in the Chernobyl explosion. By including this real-world example the author helps the reader visualize the hidden tree-fungus relationship. Wohlleben shows the reader how liquids can defy gravity in a tree’s roots by pointing out that a cup full of coffee will have the liquid sitting higher than the edge of the cup. He paints another real-world connection for the reader by explaining that it is a tree’s water movement that makes harvesting maple syrup possible in the spring.
The author analogizes human skin and tree bark to present trees’ aging process in a way that is relatable to the reader. For example, he compares tree bark to human skin, drawing numerous parallels between the two. He observes that tree bark holds in moisture, keeps out pests and disease, maintains structure, can release and absorb gasses, and is sensitive to touch, just like people’s skin. It also develops wrinkles and can be affected by illnesses. Wohlleben compares bark conditions to adolescent skin problems, writing, “In the same way teenage acne often leaves lifelong scars, an attack by bark flies can leave a tree with a rough exterior” (64).