43 pages • 1 hour read
Clarice LispectorA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The novel uses figurative language to capture the complexity of Rodrigo and Macabéa’s internal experiences. Its linguistic stylings are particularly inspired by Rodrigo’s identity as a writer and intimate relationship with language. Although he believes that Macabéa is a “dumb” and simple girl and her story is predictable and plain, he feels “tempted to use succulent terms” to write her story (7). He remarks that he loves “splendid adjectives, meaty nouns, and verbs so slender that they travel sharp through the air about to go into action” (7). However, he denies himself the luxury of employing such ornate language because his main character is of limited means. He thinks that if he touches her bread with his creative hand, “the bread will turn to gold” and she won’t “be able to bite it, dying of hunger” (7). Despite Rodrigo’s lofty proclamations about how he’ll honestly depict Macabéa’s story, he quickly proves incapable of avoiding word play, sensory detail, metaphor, and vivid description. Rather, he ultimately enriches Macabéa’s simple story through his eloquent language, subversive syntax, and elevated diction. In doing so, he gives Macabéa the gift of keen observation and affords her a world in which she can delight and find pleasure despite her otherwise meager life circumstances. The use of figurative language therefore enacts the experiences of both Rodrigo and Macabéa while capturing and conveys the complexity of their psychological conundrums.
The novel is written from the first-person point of view of the narrator, Rodrigo S. M. Although Rodrigo’s first-person perspective initially appears traditional, his narrative voice consistently subverts conventional formal expectations. In one sense, Rodrigo’s point of view is unique because he vacillates between tonal extremes; for example, in one passage he waxes eloquent on the creation of the universe, while in another he complains about the bags under his eyes or lapses into sardonic commentary (for instance, about “the most popular soft drink in the world” [15] that is sponsoring the writing of Macabéa’s story, meaning that he is drinking Coca-Cola while writing). These tonal extremes cast Rodrigo as an unfocused, unreliable, and mercurial narrator. He occasionally breaks the fourth wall and employs the first-person direct address, thus speaking directly to his imagined readers. Such moments grant his narration an intimate, vulnerable, and confessional tenor. However, this effect is fleeting, in that Rodrigo always reverts back to his more esoteric thought processes. Therefore, his narration is as uncertain and ungrounded as his inner world. He can make no more sense of himself or his beliefs about life than he can of his writing.
Rodrigo’s first-person perspective is distinct because he has an intimate relationship with Macabéa, the protagonist of the story he’s writing throughout the novel. His first-person narration therefore grants access to his creative process since he consistently remarks on his feelings for Macabéa and her unfolding story while actively fabricating her story. This formal dynamic casts the work as a meta-narrative and therefore enacts the novel’s subtextual commentaries on the purpose of art and the artist’s role in creating meaning.
The novel subverts conventional notions of the linear plotline because it doesn’t use traditional chapters or sections. In the absence of this familiar organizational structure, the novel assumes a more stream-of-consciousness style and progression. Rodrigo’s meandering thoughts, his accumulating philosophical questions, and his protracted writing process create all of the novel’s action. Rodrigo fundamentally believes that “the form is what makes the content” of a work and that “the spirit of the language” it uses is what creates the work’s meaning (9). Therefore, he intentionally divorces Macabéa’s story from the traditional linear plotline and doesn’t tell her story chronologically. Rodrigo does include allusions to her past life and childhood but presents these background details in intermittent, unpredictable bursts. The same is true of the framing story, which likewise belies structural convention: The novel opens with Rodrigo pontificating on the universe and ends with him smoking a cigarette while thinking about death. What elapses between these two passages is plotless in terms of his story and thus doesn’t take its inspiration from events or actions. These structural and formal choices inform the novel’s overarching commentaries on the purposelessness of life and the fragility of human identity.
Art
View Collection
Books & Literature
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Existentialism
View Collection
Fate
View Collection
Hispanic & Latinx American Literature
View Collection
Novellas
View Collection
Order & Chaos
View Collection
Poverty & Homelessness
View Collection
Pride Month Reads
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection