logo

45 pages 1 hour read

Moliere

The Imaginary Invalid

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1673

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Ethics and Capitalism in the Practice of Medicine

Through the lens of a 21st-century perspective, the practice of medicine stands between humanity and preventable death. The medical system has flaws, and its practitioners can be negligent or imperfect, even sometimes harmfully so. But for the layperson, much of medical knowledge is incomprehensible, and the doctors who speak the language of medicine are the only hope of many ill or seriously injured people. In the 21st century, there are laws, professional guidelines, review boards, and attempts at accountability that guide medical procedures and ethics. A patient can reasonably trust that their doctor is beholden to the Hippocratic Oath and will do their best to help. But the doctors in the play represent a very different ethos of medical practice. For the person with a 21st-century view of medicine, the harsh criticism and outright rejection of the field that Béralde articulates seems foolish and even dangerous. However, medical practitioners in Molière’s time, as well as in the world of the play, have very little real medical knowledge at their fingertips. Their primary function is to pompously speak Latin and Greek and order enemas, purgatives, herbal treatments, and bloodletting in a trial-and-error fashion that may kill the patient, make them well, or do absolutely nothing.

The Lillicraps acknowledge this uselessness in a roundabout way by mentioning that they choose to serve patients from the general public, since rich and famous patients expect to be cured. Implicit in this admission is the belief that the civilian patient does not require the same effort or result. As a patient, Argan is a golden goose for Dr. Purgeon. Medicine is an expensive capitalist venture even today in some parts of the world, and access to it is often a matter of money. While explaining his reasoning for matching his daughter to Thomas, Argan notes that they will inherit Dr. Purgeon’s considerable fortune, and Toinette comments, “He must have polished off a lot of patients to make that kind of money” (19). For a doctor whose motivation is greed, Argan is an ideal patient. He is convinced that he is sick, and he sees medicine as a transaction-based path to health. He has the wealth to pay for whatever medical treatment the doctor orders. As Béralde points out, Argan is strong and healthy enough to withstand the barrage of unnecessary treatments, which makes it easier for the doctor to avoid accidentally killing this steady source of income. Through his “treatments,” Argan’s supposed illness sustains itself, generating a constant stream of revenue for his doctor.

The play questions the ethics of medical treatment that is based in guesswork and often causes harm and criticizes doctors who manage to amass wealth without curing patients. In this context, a healthy bank account implies that the doctor is exploiting his sick patients. Béralde believes that there should be no medical intervention at all and that letting nature take its course is safer than allowing charlatans to experiment. Argan, however, believes in doctors. He worships them as superior intellects and wants their attention. At the end of the play, Argan reaches the level he truly wants by becoming a doctor himself. He doesn’t seem to recognize that the ceremony is fake. The play suggests that a layperson who acts as his own doctor is just as safe as, or perhaps safer than, someone who is under a doctor’s care. When Argan elicits a promise from Cléante to become a doctor, he may still be ridiculous for his veneration of the medical field, but he at least ensures that he will be in the hands of a doctor with altruistic intentions.

Marriage for Love and Gain

The central conflict of the play is the question: Who should have the right to decide whom Angélique will marry? As she reaches a marriageable age, her burgeoning womanhood must be tied up and contained. She has two options: marriage, which implies sex and reproduction, or commitment to a convent, which promises a life of sexless austerity. Arranged marriages were customary during the era, as marriage was more a socioeconomic institution than a romantic one. Marrying for love wasn’t unheard of, but romance certainly wasn’t the dominant consideration in choosing a spouse. The bride’s family typically offered a dowry to the groom, and the marriage arrangement was designed to be mutually beneficial to both families. The bride was the person with the least agency in these arrangements, as she was capital to be traded. Argan’s insistence that Angélique marry a doctor for the sake of free medical treatment is humorous because it shows the intensity of his obsession with doctors, but it preserves the transactional nature of marriage arrangements. The notion of romantic love as a basis for marriage was only beginning to develop in the 17th century, so the play’s depiction of the tug-of-war over Angélique’s hand represents the tugging between the older generation and the younger one for the right to define the purposes and parameters of marriage.

Notably, the nature of Argan’s marriage to Béline is pointedly ambiguous. As his second wife, Béline is a stepmother, but she does not have any children of her own. Béline pretends to be lovingly solicitous over her husband’s well-being, and Argan believes her behavior is genuine and reciprocates the love that he believes she feels for him. However, Béline’s reason for the marriage is entirely financial. As Argan stubbornly insists that his daughter marry for his gain, rather than allowing her to marry whomever she wants, his own marriage is revealed to be a sham and an attempt by his wife to take his money. In the play, the fear of a marriage for profit based on false love is greater than the fear of a profitable but openly loveless marriage. Angélique worries at the beginning whether Cléante really loves her, and Toinette can only shrug and admit that she can’t ensure his love. As in many plays, their love is founded on a single interaction, but Angélique seems shrewder than her father. The play mocks the characters who cling to tradition, refusing to consider new ways of thinking. Marrying for love is too progressive for Argan, who is particularly resistant to change. His decision at the end of the play to allow Angélique to marry Cléante is almost a technical victory: After the blowup with Dr. Purgeon, Thomas is no longer an option for her. Argan doesn’t cede his authority to choose Angélique’s husband; instead, he exerts it with the caveat that Cléante must become a doctor for him. Argan’s decision hints at progress but ultimately demonstrates his reversion to a transactional marriage arrangement.

Ridiculing the Bourgeoisie

Dr. Lillicrap places Argan and the rest of the characters firmly in the bourgeoisie when he explains why he prefers to doctor the middle class, stating, “What’s so irritating about upper-class patients is that whenever they fall ill, they insist that their doctors get them well again” (48). He openly acknowledges that doctors who treat the aristocracy do so with the goal of a cure. Conversely, doctoring Argan is a perpetual form of employment. The doctors create symptoms and treat them in an ongoing cycle. They exert no effort to make him well, and Argan isn’t cognizant enough to understand that he is being exploited. This pompous lack of self-awareness is at the crux of one of the era’s most popular literary and artistic themes: ridiculing the bourgeoisie—the emerging middle class. Unlike the aristocracy, which had both money and long bloodlines of respectability and power, the bourgeoisie were the nouveau riche. They had amassed some wealth but not the social graces of the upper class. The bourgeoisie comprised much of Molière’s audiences, and they, along with King Louis XIV, particularly enjoyed laughing at the expense of those they considered to be the gauche among them. Known for their ostentatious shows of wealth and shameless social climbing, the members of the bourgeoisie are often a subject of ridicule in Molière’s plays.

Argan’s wealth places him on the upper tiers of the bourgeoisie, but he is not quite at the level of aristocracy. He is the quintessential example of the mockable middle class. He’s foolish, cheap, greedy, morally questionable, lacking in depth and intelligence, and inept at wielding the power granted by his money and by his place as the head of the household. Argan is also gullible, which makes him a target for scamming doctors and sponging spouses. The primary conflict in the play arises from Argan’s bourgeois impetus to pinch pennies. He’s rich enough to afford medical treatment, but he can save even more money if he exchanges his daughter for free medical services. While advantageous arranged marriages were commonplace, marrying one’s daughter to a lowly doctor in exchange for unlimited enemas did not represent a step up in terms of respectability. Argan is easily manipulated by Toinette, a lower-class maid; this reinforces the notion that the only thing that raises him up socially is his money, which is easily taken. Molière’s plays mock members of the middle class, but this is not to suggest that the bourgeoisie is entirely made up of foolish people. Béralde, who is also middle class, is a voice of reason who helps Toinette save the day. Ultimately, Argan can’t be changed or significantly persuaded, but he can be manipulated and held in check.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Moliere