logo

50 pages 1 hour read

Ann Cleeves

The Long Call

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Patriarchal Systems of Control

The novel’s Devon communities are very much under the sway of various patriarchal systems of control, some of which are immediately visible and some of which remain hidden for much of the narrative. The Barum Brethren are the novel’s first and most prominent example of a patriarchal institution that exerts undue influence over its community. The religious group is run by the abusive and sexist Dennis Salter, and even the word “brethren” is a plural form of “brother,” connoting a community defined by its proximity to masculinity. Salter uses his status in the Brethren to exert control over the Brethren’s members; those who agree with his views are allowed to stay, and those who don’t, like Matthew, are excommunicated. Even institutions that are not as overtly sinister as the Barum Brethren exhibit a “boy’s club” mentality that privileges the viewpoints and desires of men, often at the expense of female members. The police force itself is an example of such an institution, for Joe Oldham’s paternal relationship with Ross allows Ross to access connections within the force that Jen isn’t privy to, and this dynamic creates a distinct social network through which Oldham can directly impact Matthew’s investigation, using his relationship with and power over Ross.

The women who exist within these patriarchal frameworks are acutely aware of the effects these systems have, and some effects are immediately visible. While Jen works the case alongside Ross, she is often asked to stay at the station and take phone calls while Ross saves the more active fieldwork for himself. Jen reflects on the mundane task of manning the phones, saying, “Ross would think that was women’s work, sifting through the corded messages, phoning back the callers. And she would be better at it than him, more patient, more sympathetic” (88). Jen’s observation reflects the sexist double-bind of being a woman who must work within a patriarchal system. Jen has had to build emotional and interpersonal skills that the men in her line of work are not expected to cultivate, and as a result, her willingness to develop these skills relegates her to undesirable tasks in the workplace. Thus, Jen must navigate the sexist demands of patriarchal systems every day.

While Jen’s workplace dynamics are an overt effect, other aspects of negotiating the limitations of a patriarchal society are not as readily visible. For example, Rosa’s plotline demonstrates the violence and abuse that women within this culture must anticipate and cope with. Everyone who knows about Edward’s actions immediately works to cover up his crime and silence anyone who would tell the truth, and when the truth does come to light, Rosa is blamed for her own rape, with Christopher Preece labeling her as “being a little…promiscuous” (329). This reaction to Rosa’s rape highlights the fact that patriarchal systems respond to the harms they create by silencing and obfuscating the truth, for the men who run the Woodyard use every lever of power at their disposal to ensure that Rosa’s story is never told. Christopher’s financial power, Dennis’s religious power, and Colin’s legal power work together to silence the women who might otherwise tell Rosa’s story—Rosa, Janet, and Lucy. By silencing those whose testimony would threaten the existing patriarchal institution, such men maintain their control despite the gross injustices that have occurred. The narrative also implies that men like Christopher and Dennis gain their power from the façade of beneficence and respectability. Jen notes at the end of the narrative that Ross had “been brought up to believe that respectable people could do no wrong” (352). The circumstances surrounding Rosa’s assault and Simon’s murder illustrate the fact that silencing institutional wrongdoing is a means by which powerful people maintain their façade of respectability. In this way, patriarchal systems sustain their power despite the social imbalances they create.

Coping With Guilt

Nearly every character in the novel must deal with a form of guilt. Most notably, Simon originally came to Barnstable as a way of coping with the guilt he felt over inadvertently killing a child. Likewise, the case’s connections to the Barum Brethren dredge up Matthew’s lingering guilt over his estrangement from his family, and the pressures of the case create new guilt over the dynamics of his marriage to Jonathan. Meanwhile, Jen deals with constant guilt over whether her job allows her to spend enough time with her children. Guilt is also the primary driver of the crimes underpinning the novel’s plot, for Edward’s inability to cope with his guilt over his rape of Rosa motivates Caroline, Dennis, and Christopher to hide his crimes rather than allowing him to face the consequences of his actions.

Edward and Caroline cope with their guilt over Edward’s rape of Rosa by suppressing the truth entirely. Edward confesses that hiding the truth about what he did to Rosa and carrying on with his life in the clergy “seemed the brave thing to do. The least easy” (357). His desire to take what he perceives as “the least easy” course of action speaks to the nature of his guilt; he knows that he has transgressed, and he feels the need to be punished. In his mind, enduring punishment might allow him to feel some sense of absolution. Dennis and Grace Salter also seek absolution from guilt after Grace murders Simon. When Grace tells Dennis what she has done, he responds by telling her that they should pray instead of contacting the authorities. Ironically, although both Edward and the Salters seek absolution from their guilt by depending on their faith, they ultimately use faith as a shield to protect themselves from the full consequences of their actions. By suppressing their guilt and depending on a form of absolution based on faith alone, Edward and the Salters prevent the victims of their crimes from finding any sort of healing or closure.

In stark contrast to these characters, Simon Walden models a very different method of coping with grief by publicly atoning for his crime. He goes to prison, and when he is released, he continues to cope with the fallout of his family’s response. After accepting responsibility for his actions, Simon goes a step further and decides to work on behalf of the community he has hurt—people with Down syndrome—by pursuing the truth behind Rosa’s rape. He tells Gaby that if he is able to reveal the truth of what the Woodyard is hiding, he will “be able to get rid of this albatross around my neck […] [and] face the world again” (284). Although Simon does not live to experience the results of his pursuit of truth and penance, his method of coping with guilt speaks to Matthew. In the novel’s final pages, Matthew changes his approach to the primary source of his guilt: his relationship with his estranged mother. Rather than continuing to ignore his mother and suppress his long-held guilt, Matthew decides to reestablish a connection with her by inviting her to Sunday dinners. This act suggests that Matthew has adopted Simon’s approach to dealing with guilt—by accepting responsibility and working toward communal healing—as the only useful way of finding resolution.

The Impact of Rural Faith Communities

The communities featured in The Long Call are deeply traditional and Christian. Christian value systems in the novel are reproduced and enforced by groups like the Barum Brethren, who preserve beliefs and practices that the protagonists often find to be outdated and problematic. For example, while watching Grace interact with Dennis, Matthew notes, “It was as if she couldn’t answer even a simple question without her husband’s agreement. But that was the way it was supposed to be within the Brethren. The women always deferred to the men” (168). Such sexist, outdated attitudes are perpetuated under the guise of being foundational to this faith tradition, and throughout the novel, members of the Barum Brethren also enforce conservative moral standards by expressing disapproval of gambling and marriage equality.

Through Matthew’s narration, Cleeves explores the impact that these insular faith communities have on both their members and others within the Devon area who do not share their faith. Despite Matthew’s estrangement from the Brethren and rejection of their beliefs, he is still heavily influenced by the group’s moral codes. Upon entering a gambling parlor, Matthew reflects that “[a]s a child, he’d scuttled past the doors of betting shops, anxious that he might be drawn into temptation. Even now, he experienced something of the thrill of guilty pleasure” (203). Even though Matthew no longer believes that gambling is a sin, he still experiences guilt as an emotional response upon entering an establishment whose practices do not align with the Brethren’s moral mandates. This emotional response speaks to the lingering religious trauma that Matthew experiences because of his early indoctrination. Even though his actions are no longer dictated by the Brethren’s code of conduct, the years of guilt-based moralizing still condition his emotional responses.

Even though Matthew still lives with the guilt and trauma of his upbringing amongst the Brethren, his choice to distance himself from the group ultimately gives him the perspective he needs to make his own assessments about the role of faith in his life. For example, when noting the moral weight that Colin Marston attaches to actions like spending money, Matthew reflects that “[t]he Brethren had been much the same. […] [They had] created a God in their own image, hard, cold and inflexible” (232). Matthew’s distance from the Brethren therefore allows him to see how the faith community warps the worldviews of its members, and he also gains the space to examine the faith community’s construction of “God” and determine how this mindset reflects their own biases rather than honoring an impartial representation of Christian morality. This realization allows Matthew to think about the divine on his own terms. By distancing himself from the Brethren and their guilt-based modes of moralizing, Matthew broadens his relationship with faith and starts to find divinity in new parts of his life. Matthew’s estrangement from the Barum Brethren, despite being a source of trauma, ultimately allows him to come to a more expansive understanding of what faith, “God,” and the divine mean to him.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text