50 pages • 1 hour read
Langston HughesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Of central concern in Hughes’s essay is the issue of being a Black artist in a White supremacist society, where race and racism influence both the creative process and the public’s reception of artwork. In the piece, Hughes focuses primarily on artists who are “promising” (Paragraph 1) or already well-known; at times, Hughes names specific artists who might be common household names, and, at other moments, Hughes obscures identities (typically when offering a criticism). Towards the conclusion of the essay, Hughes uses himself as an example of a Black artist, explicitly connecting his work with the legacy of his peers and forebears.
As Hughes explores the challenge of creating authentic art that does not attempt to assimilate towards Whiteness, he discusses different angles of Black identity and its influence on the artistic process and the artist’s own identity. In multiple examples, Hughes shows how Black culture can limit artists, primarily when other Black people push the artist towards so-called respectability and White mannerisms. He also demonstrates how Black culture can positively impact creativity, as in the examples of “the low-down folks, the so-called common element” (Paragraph 4) of Black people and their “wealth of colorful, distinctive material” (Paragraph 4).
The tensions between these social classes, to Hughes, mimic the challenges Black artists must face as they figure out how to produce something separate from White culture that is generative, creative, and rich. The Black artist, to Hughes, is constantly working “against an undertow of sharp criticism and misunderstanding from [other Black people] and unintentional bribes from... whites” (Paragraph 9). This conflict means that creating art that is based in freedom is a challenging, ongoing process for Black artists, one that excites Hughes as he thinks about the possibility of this vision.
In the essay, Hughes explores the effects of capitalist society on the ways individuals go about living their lives. This aspect of the essay has less to do with the specific Black artist and more to do with the conditions that create the artist; in several places, Hughes references the type of work that different people do and how their work relates to their creative expression. In presenting this tension, Hughes presents a layered critique of the myriad challenges posed by American society, all of which impact Black artists trying to produce authentic expression.
In the introductory section of Hughes’s essay, he references a young Black poet who has grown up middle-class; this artist’s father “goes to work every morning” (Paragraph 2) and the family is interested in assimilating into Whiteness. In this limited space, Hughes describes the young Black artist as being unable to “see” the beauty of Black identity. Subsequently, Hughes describes lower-class Black people who “work maybe a little today, rest a little tomorrow” (Paragraph 4). Hughes praises the “joy” of these citizens who “still hold their own individuality” (Paragraph 4). To Hughes, a resistance to “work” is connected to a resistance to assimilation; in other words, assimilation demands believing in a capitalist White system, while resistance allows one to exist outside of that sphere in a freer way.
Another core theme of Hughes’s essay concerns an internal conflict that afflicts many Black artists: the internal pull towards White assimilation versus resistance to this pull. A key nuance of Hughes’s argument exists in his vision of Black resistance as an internal, personal process. Black artists who are “free” are the ones who can view all of their own beauty and ugliness, while reflecting on these qualities authentically through art.
This aspect of Hughes’s argument points to a larger social critique that threads its way subtly throughout the essay: although Hughes specifically addresses Black artists, to some extent, he offers these ideas as a critique of Black society’s maladaptation as a whole.
Many members of the Black community who have achieved greater material wealth, Hughes argues, have sought to become more like Whites; yet, this assimilation has led to internal shame and a sense of limitation. True Black resistance, Hughes believes, is the ability to accept “a true picture” (Paragraph 12) of Blackness. If young Black artists are able to move past assimilation into resistance, Hughes believes that they are able to ask, “Why should I want to be white? I am a Negro—and beautiful” (Paragraph 12). In this statement, Hughes reflects an assertion that could apply to any Black person living in US society, whether an artist or not. The act of striving towards White assimilation carries a depth of shame about one’s own identity, so true resistance is reflected in a sense of happiness with oneself.
By Langston Hughes
A Black Lives Matter Reading List
View Collection
African American Literature
View Collection
Art
View Collection
Black History Month Reads
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Creative Nonfiction
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Harlem Renaissance
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection