46 pages • 1 hour read
Jon GordonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Positive leaders create unity, which is the difference between a great team and an average one. While a vision and a north star are important, the leader’s ability to unite and connect people is what makes an organization great. Alan Mulally’s “One Ford” plan did this, bringing regionalized companies together as one team with a single goal.
A leadership team itself must be connected. For instance, the success of a sports team depends on the connectedness of the owner, general manager, and head coach. When companies merge, it is important to make sure that the leaders are connected. In some college and professional sports teams, players focus on their individual goals; in offices, people often focus on politics and personal agendas. Gordon calls this narcissism the “disease of me” and says that it infects everyone (90), not just athletes, and that it undermines teams.
One way to build connection is to have each team member share a defining moment in their life. Another is to have each person on the team share their “hero, hardship, and highlight” (91). Dabo Swinney, the Clemson coach, uses a stool called the “Safe Seat”: Each team member takes a turn on the stool while the team gathers around him. Swinney asks the member questions about his life, heroes, defining moments, and challenges. The rest of the team can then ask questions; the answers can never leave the room. The vulnerability and authenticity of the experience help the players build strong bonds.
Gordon argues that the “old dictatorial style of leadership” no longer works yet still exists in the workplace (93). He attributes this to selfishness, busyness, and stress. The latter issues activate the amygdala, the reptilian part of the brain that is associated with fear and survival. The term for the process of the amygdala taking over the rational part of the brain, the neocortex, is cortical inhibition: A leader in this mode focuses on to-do lists rather than on people.
Gordon characterizes the neocortex as the “positive dog” part of the brain. Under stress, a person’s “reptile” (reptile brain) eats the positive dog. Road rage is one example of this process, but leaders don’t have to let the reptile win. To fight back, however, they need to recognize stress and find something to be thankful for in that moment.
The first step for leaders is to be a person whom others want to follow. This requires investing in relationships and being caring and trustworthy. Gordon argues that the two questions that teams are always asking of their leader are “Can I trust you?” and “Do you care about me?” (101).
For this reason, leadership starts with love. Gordon points to Bob Goff, author of Love Does, who founded a nonprofit by the same name to rescue underage girls from sexual slavery in India and Uganda. For Gordon, Goff’s story shows that love is the “greatest leadership principle on the planet” (102). As another example, Gordon says that good teachers know their lesson plans but that great teachers know and love their students.
Gordon explains that lack of communication is a major cause of team breakdowns and that communication requires building a trusting and loving relationship. Gordon gives the example of a women’s volleyball coach whose communication tool is called the “1-Minute Drill”: The coach calls a player into his office several times each season to tell them what they are doing well, what needs work, and what to focus on in the next training cycle. Conversely, when communication is absent, negativity is likely to result; communication helps prevent rumors and negative energy from spreading. Even families can benefit from weekly meetings to discuss the family mission statement, past and future challenges, and anything else that is important.
Because communication is so vital, good leaders get out of the office and interact with their team. That the dynamics of groups are constantly changing makes this especially important. Gordon suggests asking questions, listening, learning, and then using the information to make decisions. Listening is especially important, helping the leader understand the situation better while making the other person feel heard and valued. Positive leaders welcome criticism because it makes them better.
When it comes to delivering positive and negative feedback, Gordon likes the phrase “Shout praise, whisper criticism” (111), which he learned from basketball coaches. The “shout” comes in front of peers, while the “whisper” is done in private.
Smiling is an important part of positive communication. Smiling produces serotonin, an antidepressant, in the brains of both the giver and the receiver. Other nonverbal techniques are nods, high-fives, pats on the back, and fist bumps. Sharing positive news about others and offering encouragement are other forms of positive encouragement; with regard to the latter, Gordon notes that being encouraging means believing in others more than they believe in themselves. For instance, he told his own daughter that she was “unstoppable” when she was a very tentative lacrosse player, and she improved to the point of receiving offers to play in college.
Nevertheless, connection requires more than communication. Team members must feel the leader’s own commitment to them; leaders must put the needs of the team before their own. This may involve serving team members, as great leaders such as Jesus and Martin Luther King, Jr., served others. The leader must decide to serve “me or we” (119). Gordon gives the example of a time when he had to cut back on his travels to help his family manage their relationships at home. Although, at times, he wished he had a different “team,” he made sure to encourage his children and study with them, and he helped his wife with the laundry. He realized that the “team” was not the problem; as the leader, he himself was. Moreover, the challenges that teams present make leaders better. To illustrate this point, Gordon recounts the story of the CEO of 24 Hour Fitness ordering the company’s executives to train at their own centers to spend time interacting with staff members and learn how to better serve them. They also had to work for a week in one location each year. As a result, the executives better understood the needs of their customers.
Great leaders have what Gordon calls a “caring trademark,” a unique way to show that they care. For instance, as CEO of Campbell Soup, Doug Conant wrote over 10,000 thank-you notes to employees. Similarly, the superintendent of a high school district in Texas writes a note to every senior who graduates. Gordon himself learned a lesson in leadership from his mother when she grew tired during a walk that they were taking yet insisted on continuing to get to a store and make a sandwich for him. It was the last time he saw his mother conscious.
A positive leader constantly pursues excellence and is a lifelong learner, no matter their age. These leaders are demanding but not demeaning. They provide both love and accountability, a lesson that Gordon considers the most important in the book.
Alan Mulally, who turned Ford around, is an example of a leader who combined love and respect for the employees with accountability. He had “zero tolerance” for violating established processes and addressed such violations to show his own commitment to the process. Coach Dabo Swinney is another example of a leader who provides both love and accountability. He holds players responsible for following the team rules, even if it means keeping a star player out of a game.
While Gordon believes in tough love, he prefers the idea of “love tough,” which he defines as a leader’s willingness to challenge the team. The result is a team of craftspeople rather than carpenters, the difference being that the craftsperson is engaged not merely in building but in making art. He gives an example from Steve Jobs’s childhood, when he was helping his father build a fence. Jobs’s father told him that he had to care as much about crafting the back of the fence as the front because Jobs would know if the job was not well done. At the same time, Gordon acknowledges that Jobs was widely thought to fall short in developing relationships. Jobs was a craftsman, but no one is a “perfect positive leader” with every trait Gordon discusses (145).
Gordon introduces the “one percent” rule: the idea of giving 1% more time and effort than one gave the day before. A team of 35 people all giving 1% more gives 35% daily.
Ultimately, excellence requires clarity and action. Mulally, for instance, used various visual images to communicate the Ford team’s management policies, processes, and strategies—e.g., laminating the images on a two-sided card so that everyone could work toward the same goals.
Although Gordon has indicated the importance of teamwork throughout, Chapters 7-9 explicitly focus on his third major theme: The Importance of Connected and Accountable Teams. Chapters 7 and 8 are devoted to building connected teams, while Chapter 9 specifically addresses accountability.
Connectivity is key because a united team does its best work. Gordon therefore suggests concrete strategies for building relationships and fostering unity—e.g., exercises that encourage team members to open up to one another. Importantly, the author’s model of connectivity also extends to leaders: He addresses the fact that a dictatorial management strategy, where leaders give unilateral orders for workers to carry out, is not a viable model because it lacks the benefits of collaboration. A collaborative approach not only allows the leader to gather critical input and solutions but also fosters “connection, ownership, and buy-in” (94).
Nor can a leader simply go through the motions of collaborating and expect results. As in other sections of the book, Gordon stresses the importance of the leader’s underlying attitude in Establishing a Positive Culture: An effective leader is trustworthy and honest and genuinely cares about the team to the point of loving, serving, and sacrificing for them. To underscore this point, Gordon cites examples who may strike readers as almost superhuman in their selflessness, including Martin Luther King, Jr., and Jesus. In stressing the importance of serving others through leadership, the author leans into the resistance that his ideas may encounter with a paradox, saying that you don’t have to be great to serve, but “you have to serve to be great” (120). This idea runs counter to contemporary Western ideas of leadership, but Gordon tacitly encourages readers to embrace the discomfort as part of putting others first. In Chapter 9, he describes more ways in which positive leaders pursue excellence, including being “humble” but “hungry,” being open to new ideas, and always looking to improve.
Despite his intense focus on leaders’ caring qualities and humility, however, Gordon describes the section of Chapter 9 called “Love and Accountability” as the most important part of the book. In other words, while he stresses that leadership starts with genuine love for the team, he also insists that a leader’s love must be tempered with a clear-eyed focus on the organization’s goals and its culture and a willingness to confront team members who do not respect these. For instance, leaders must be on the lookout for narcissists when building relationships and collaboration. Narcissism can derail a team, and like negativity, it must be transformed or weeded out or else the group’s culture will suffer. As Ford’s Mulally put it, positive leadership means building relationships and showing respect, but it is also about “relentless” implementation of the business plan. The idea that leaders need to combine love and respect with the expectation of accountability is a popular theme in contemporary leadership books, such as Kim Scott’s Radical Candor.
Accountability, in short, ties back to Gordon’s claim that culture is everything, as letting people get away with actions that could derail a group’s focus and vision will negatively impact organizational positivity. Gordon, however, believes in “love tough” more than “tough love.” His version literally puts love first and emphasizes the desire to help the other person be their best. He distinguishes failure, for instance, from an unwillingness to follow the company’s process and suggests that the two situations require entirely different responses. Failure can be met with support, but violating the process shows a lack of commitment—and the leader who allows such violations is doing the same thing. He also provides an example of “loving tough” from his own experience parenting teenage children, suggesting that he knows from experience that a team will not hate their leader’s criticism if they are motivated by it—an idea meant to encourage readers who may fear holding team members accountable.
In light of this section’s heavy focus on teamwork, it is noteworthy that Gordon turns again to the example of Apple’s Steve Jobs in Chapter 9, as he acknowledges that Jobs wasn’t good at building relationships. However, the author observes that Jobs had many of the other qualities of positive leadership, including vision, mission, and the optimism that he manifested in his reality distortion. Although other figures—Hendrick, Swinney, and especially Mulally—come closer, in Gordon’s portrayal, to embodying the ideal leader, the author is careful to include a diverse range of examples. This seeks to motivate readers who might otherwise be dispirited by an apparently unattainable goal, but it also allows Gordon to put his commitment to accountability into practice by candidly stating that “no one is a perfect positive leader” (145).