42 pages • 1 hour read
Bertrand RussellThe Problems of Philosophy
Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1912A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Chapters 1-3Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Chapter 1 Summary: “Appearance and Reality”
Philosophers seek to answer big questions about how humans perceive the external world and whether knowledge is concrete. Russell uses the table he sits at as he writes as an example of appearance and reality. His setting is simple: a desk with some papers on it. He assumes that anyone walking into the room would see the same desk that he is seeing and recognize the same qualities that he does: rectangular, brown, and smooth. However, he notes how the light coming in from the window changes the color of the desk in some spots and acknowledges that another person walking through the room will see the light fall on the desk differently from him. Russell asserts that there is no singular color indicative of the reality of the table: “It appears to be of different colours from different points of view, and there is no reason for regarding some of these as more really its colour than others” (2). How one person perceives the table at one point in the room is vastly different from how another perceives it at a different point. The light falls in a different way, causing the two individuals’ experiences of the color of the table to be individualized and subjective.
Russell continues to build doubt about humans’ perception of reality. The texture of the table may appear smooth, but a microscope may show that it is rough. Another, more powerful microscope reveals even more new information about the table, calling into question whether even the microscope offers insight into a permanent reality. Even the shape of the table is not concrete. As a person moves around the room, the table appears to change shape. Russell uses this analogy to expose the nature of human perception. He argues that humans do not perceive reality for what it is; instead, they access the world through their own, individualized perspectives that are shaped by their experiences and logical processes.
Many philosophers are idealists who say that the appearance and sensation of an object exists only in the mind. Idealists exist across a spectrum. Pure idealism asserts that the external world is immaterial and that perception of an external world is nothing more than the construction of ideas within the mind. The reality of the physical object is debated. Russell uses an idealist argument to prove the existence of the physical object. If humans only understand the world through their own minds, then they are unable to know whether the external world exists or not. Human understanding is limited by appearance. Perception of the external world gives insight into sense data but not the object itself. However, Russell argues that the external world does exist and that humans can know this for certain through intuition.
Chapter 2 Summary: “The Existence of Matter”
Russell further explores whether matter truly exists. He argues that this is a fundamental question: “If we cannot be sure of the independent existence of objects, we shall be left alone in a desert—it may be that the whole outer world is nothing but a dream” (8). Human existence is predicated upon a belief in an external world. The eradication of this belief destroys meaning and purpose. Russell applies logical analysis to prove the existence of matter. In doing so, he draws a line between appearance and reality and establishes an epistemological theory for how humans interact with physical objects.
Russell begins by establishing the reality of sense data, even if this does not prove the reality of the physical object. Humans have an intuitive impression of sense data that Russell argues should not be overlooked. A person’s experience must form the basis of philosophical understanding. The philosopher René Descartes challenged every perception until he was certain that the only concept about life that he knew to be true was his own existence. Russell explains that it is difficult to determine whether even the self is real, but philosophy requires a foundation to build upon. The certainty of sense data forms this foundation.
Sense data is a private experience. When 10 people sit around a table, each views the table from a different angle and engages in personalized sensory experience. Some philosophers may argue that the fact that all 10 people perceive the table and glasses proves that these physical objects exist. However, Russell outlines how even assurance about the existence of other people can be challenged. Because humans experience one another through sensation, the existence of other people as external objects is called into question.
Russell confirms the existence of physical objects through a simple thought exercise. A person notices a cat at one side of a room but then looks away. A few minutes later, the cat appears in a different part of the room. The existence of the cat or any physical object, even when it is not being observed by a person, proves its reality. For example, the fact that a cat feels hunger means that it has its own experience independent of the observer’s sense data. Russell admits that this argument is based on intuition more than hard evidence. Philosophy relies on intuitive belief to build an understanding of the world. It is only when those beliefs clash with others that they can be challenged.
Chapter 3 Summary: “The Nature of Matter”
In this chapter, Russell turns his attention to matter, or the physical object. It is imperative that he establishes the concreteness of the external world before diving deeper into his epistemological theories. Rather than asking about how humans gain knowledge, he questions the nature of the external world: “What is the nature of this real table, which persists independently of my perception of it?” (15). Even when he takes his hand off the table and closes his eyes, he does not lose his sense that the table still exists.
Physical science seeks to explain this phenomenon by explaining vision from wave motion. However, Russell explains that there is a quality to the perception of light that cannot be explained. Scientists are concerned with the reality of the object in space. To the scientist, a circular coin is circular. However, to the observer, a circular coin on its side may appear oval. Russell proposes that physical objects live inside a physical space and that human interaction with this physical world creates sensations. Because people experience the world differently, they only have sense data of their individual private spaces.
The same principles apply to time. Humans experience private sensations of time. When they are bored, time seems to drag; when they are engaged, time moves quickly. Russel argues that just as there is no reason to question the existence of physical objects or the self, there is no reason to question time order.
However, believing in the existence of physical objects or time does not answer questions about their nature. Because sense data of a physical object is determined by the wave motions of light, the true color of the object, for example, cannot be concretely determined. Idealists propose that the external world is mostly mental, meaning that whatever appears to the individual only exists within the mind.
Chapters 1-3 Analysis
While sense data is subjective and can change from person to person and across contexts, Russell argues that philosophers must build their theories upon an intuitive understanding that the external world exists. In doing so, he reveals one of the aspects of his work that distinguishes him from others. Russell approaches philosophy with straightforward, practical, and logical analysis. He explains that philosophies like idealism are part of the reason that so many people dismiss philosophy as superfluous and confusing.
Russell’s work is known for its accessibility. His clear and direct writing style, along with his logical approach and use of concrete examples, is indicative of his desire to make philosophy palatable to the public and of his many years as an educator. Russell uses quotidian images to explain complex philosophical concepts in The Problems of Philosophy. Using models—such as the appearance of a table, which is explored repeatedly in the first three chapters—he unpacks basic epistemological questions about the true nature of matter and how external objects are perceived by humans.
In Chapter 1, Russell illustrates how philosophers think about The Relationship Between Perception and Reality. He asserts that there is a distinct difference between how humans perceive objects and their reality and that what humans sense of the external world is slippery rather than concrete. Consider Russell’s table and how it may be perceived by different people. He uses color as an extended analogy to illustrate his point. Like the table, color is something quotidian onto which Russell projects his arguments for accessibility. In comparison to the table, however, color is less solid and tangible, meaning that it reflects his ideas about reality clashing with human perception.
Because different people have different experiences of the external world, philosophers must rely on an intuitive understanding to form philosophical theories. Russell argues that intuitive understanding is important and not to be dismissed. People have an inherent sense of the world around them. Even after closing one’s eyes, the existence of the table still seems concrete. Additionally, one’s sense that the self exists does not falter when one ceases to look in a mirror. The human experience of the world is that it is real and that people are real within it. However, there are restrictions to what the mind can know for sure about reality; Russell hence explores The Nature and Limits of Human Knowledge. He suggests that even under the intuitive assumption of the external world’s existence, one can never know for sure if what they are experiencing is a fabrication of the mind.
Yet Russell argues that this intuitive experience is extremely important in philosophy. He suggests that The Value of Philosophy is its ability to pose questions rather than find answers. For this reason, Russell organizes his thoughts around different questions. Chapter 1 asks whether humans can trust their own sensations, Chapter 2 explores whether matter is real, and Chapter 3 questions the nature of matter. At various points in the text, Russell admits that his arguments are instinctive rather than scientific, but he also argues that intuitive experience is just as important as data derived from science.
In the first three chapters, Russell makes two major determinations that form the foundation for the rest of the work. Firstly, he argues that humans do gain knowledge about physical objects through sense data, but their experiences may differ. Secondly, he argues that physical objects exist in a physical space, but humans experience everything within their own private spaces. Russell’s thesis challenges several major philosophical schools about the nature of knowledge and matter. One of these is John Locke’s notion of the tabula rasa—the idea that all people are born with minds like blank slates, waiting to be filled with information from sense experience. While Russell confirms that sense data plays a role in knowledge, he challenges the notion that humans’ sensory experiences can be trusted. The other is the philosophical view of idealism, which suggests that humans’ sensations of the physical world are created within their minds, which Russell examines further in Chapter 4. By challenging major philosophical schools of thought, Russell presents himself as an authoritative figure.
Related Titles
By Bertrand Russell
