logo

60 pages 2 hours read

David Abram

The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1996

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 4-5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 4 Summary: “Animism and the Alphabet”

Abram explores the impact of alphabetic writing on humanity’s relationship with the natural world, suggesting that the transition to a literate society marked a significant shift away from an animistic engagement with the environment. He contrasts Indigenous cultures’ respect and reverence for nature, maintained through oral traditions and a participatory sense of reality, with the ecological disregard characteristic of European civilization, which he attributes to a written culture that devalues sensory experience and direct engagement with the animate landscape.

Abram traces the origins of this disconnection to both the Hebraic and Greek traditions, which, despite their differences, both rely on the written word through the alphabet. This technology of writing, he argues, originated from an interplay between human communities and their landscapes, wherein natural phenomena and animal tracks once served as the first scripts. However, with the development of the alphabet, particularly its adaptation by the Greeks from the Semitic “aleph-beth,” language became abstracted from the more-than-human world, instead focusing on human-made signs and the sounds they represented. This shift, according to Abram, marked the beginning of humanity’s estrangement from the natural world, as language and knowledge became increasingly human centric.

The alphabet reduced the complexity of written symbols to a manageable set of characters representing sounds rather than direct experiences or entities, thus facilitating human disconnection from nature. While the early Semitic scripts retained some connections to the natural world through their pictographic roots, the Greek adaptation further abstracted language from nature by removing these sensory references. This abstraction was solidified by the philosophical and religious traditions that emerged in these literate cultures, which emphasized a separation between the human and nonhuman, the spiritual and the material.

Abram suggests that the privileging of alphabetic writing over oral, participatory engagement with the world contributed significantly to the modern ecological crisis by fostering a view of nature as a set of passive resources rather than a living, speaking community. He underscores the importance of recognizing and revisiting the animistic roots of human interaction with the world, proposing that a reengagement with oral traditions and a more embodied, sensory experience of language could help bridge the gap between humanity and the natural world.

In this section, Abram discusses the transition from an oral to a literate culture, focusing on the impact of the Homeric epics’ transcription on oral traditions and the shift in human engagement with the natural world. When the Homeric epics were recorded, the role of rhapsodes as preservers of knowledge diminished, marking a separation of language from the animate world. Writing objectified language, creating a reflective relationship between the scribe and the text, which led to a new form of reflexivity and the emergence of philosophical thought distinct from oral traditions.

The early philosophers, still influenced by oral culture, began to abstract qualities from situations, a process that alphabetic writing enabled. Socrates and Plato, for instance, sought the essence of virtues independent of specific instances, relying on the permanence and objectivity that writing provided to language. This marked the beginning of thinking that emphasized eternal, unchanging forms over fleeting, sensory experiences of the natural world.

Plato’s critique of writing in Phaedrus acknowledges its potential to cause forgetfulness and the loss of wisdom, given that written words can be misunderstood and misused. Despite his criticisms, however, Plato’s work and thought embody the literate intellect’s separation from the sensory world, privileging the realm of eternal ideas over the animate earth. Phaedrus itself, set outside the city walls among natural elements like trees and cicadas, offers a space where oral and literate cultures might reconcile. However, even as Plato acknowledges the power of the oral-poetic universe, he subordinates the sensory, participatory experience of the body and nature to the intellect’s quest for eternal truths. This transition to literacy, encapsulated in the development and spread of the Greek alphabet, enabled a shift in consciousness that favored abstract thought and the contemplation of unchanging forms over direct engagement with the animate landscape, setting the stage for Western philosophy’s ongoing disregard for the natural world.

Abram emphasizes the vital role of synesthesia, the overlap and intertwining of the senses, in understanding the changes that resulted from the advent of phonetic literacy. He again draws on Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology to illustrate how reading involves a synesthetic encounter, merging sight and sound through the medium of writing and thus fundamentally altering sensory engagement with the world. This new form of participation with text, rather than with the animate landscape, marks a significant departure from the animistic, participatory perception characteristic of oral cultures.

The transition to literacy, especially through the development of the alphabet, led to a self-reflexive form of animism focused on human-made signs, diminishing the sensory, participatory dialogue with the more-than-human world. This shift is exemplified by Indigenous reactions to phonetic writing as a form of magic, viewing written pages as “talking leaves” and attributing divine powers to alphabetic letters.

Abram contrasts the animistic engagement of oral cultures with the natural world, where every element could communicate with and participate in human life, with the isolated, self-contained interaction of literate cultures with their texts. He suggests that the alphabet not only facilitated a new kind of magic but also cast a spell on human senses, removing the rich, multisensory dialogue with nature in favor of engagement with inert letters on a page.

This encapsulation of human senses and experiences within the written word, according to Abram, contributed to the silencing of the natural world for literate cultures, a phenomenon that the Spanish conquest of the Americas further illustrated. The discrepancy between the participatory magic of the Aztecs and the self-reflexive magic of the Spaniards, enabled by alphabetic literacy, led to the disempowerment and silence of Indigenous peoples in the face of European colonization.

Chapter 5 Summary: “In the Landscape of Language”

Abram explores the relationship between language and the natural world in oral cultures, highlighting the connection between human speech and the animate landscape. He emphasizes that in oral societies, language is not just a human construct but an exchange that encompasses the sounds, rhythms, and expressions of the natural environment. This participatory engagement with the world is evident in the way oral cultures attune their languages to the contours of the landscape and the calls of its inhabitants.

Abram presents examples from diverse cultures, such as the Amazonian rainforest inhabitants and the Koyukon people of Alaska, to illustrate how the immediately surrounding natural world influences the sounds and patterns of human speech. In these cultures, animals and the land are not silent backdrops but active participants in the linguistic realm: Their calls and cries are interwoven into the fabric of human language. The Koyukon people, for instance, perceive birds and other animals as possessing their own forms of language and interpret certain animal calls as meaningful phrases in the Koyukon language. These interpretations are often tied to ancient stories from the Distant Time, a mythic era when humans and nonhuman entities shared a common language and society. The text highlights how, in oral cultures, the boundary between human language and the expressive life of the landscape is porous, allowing for a synesthetic exchange that modern, literate cultures have largely lost. Abram argues that remnants of this deep linguistic and ecological interrelatedness persist at the fringes of the expanding global monoculture, offering a window into a more reciprocal and respectful mode of inhabiting the earth.

In addition, he delves into the significance of storytelling and place-names within Indigenous oral cultures, particularly focusing on how these elements intertwine with the natural landscape and seasons. He highlights that in North American native communities, sacred stories are traditionally told only at night during the winter months. This timing is not arbitrary; the stories themselves hold a magical power, believed to influence not only people but also the land itself, potentially hastening the arrival of spring. Winter, a time when many animals hibernate and the land rests, is deemed the safest period for recounting tales that directly reference the exploits and attributes of animals and other natural entities. Such stories, if told in the presence of the subjects during active seasons, could cause offense or upset. The Koyukon people, for example, use circumlocution to avoid directly naming certain animals, out of respect and to avoid drawing bad luck.

This respectful and mindful engagement with the natural world is also reflected in the Western Apache people’s use of place-names and the telling of agodzaahi tales, or stories that tie moral and ethical lessons to specific locations within the landscape. The people recount these tales to address and amend community misdeeds, directly impacting the individuals involved by reminding them of their connection and obligation to both the community and the land. The stories function as moral compasses, and the places named within them are constant, living reminders of lessons learned.

Abram explores how these practices underscore a relationship between language, land, and community ethics among Indigenous cultures. For these communities, storytelling is not merely a way to pass down knowledge and values but an active participation in the life of the land. The natural landscape is not a backdrop for human activities but a vital participant in the stories that define a community’s ethical and moral standards. Through storytelling, Indigenous cultures maintain connection to their environment, seeing themselves as characters within a larger story that the earth itself is telling.

Abram explores the Dreamtime beliefs of the Aboriginal peoples of Australia, emphasizing the connection between their oral traditions and the natural landscape. The Dreamtime, or Jukurrpa/Alcheringathat, represents a time beyond ordinary experience, in which ancestral beings shaped the world through their journeys, leaving behind a landscape rich in stories and spiritual significance. As these ancestral beings moved across the land, their actions and encounters with various elements and creatures created earth’s current physical and spiritual geography, including mountains, waterholes, and other natural features.

Aboriginal culture is rooted in the land, and each place holds stories that guide behavior, social customs, and the ethical relationships between people and the environment. These stories are passed down through generations as “songlines” or Dreaming tracks, which are both auditory and physical paths across the continent. These songlines are essential for navigation and survival, linking people to specific places that provide water, shelter, and food.

The act of singing or recounting these Dreaming stories is not merely a recollection of past events but a reenactment that keeps the landscape alive and maintains the connection between the present and the Dreamtime. Each Aboriginal person inherits a part of the songlines, tying their identity and responsibilities to the land and its other inhabitants, including plants and animals. This connection dictates their stewardship of the land, their dietary restrictions, and their social and spiritual obligations.

Abram highlights the reciprocal mnemonic relationship between the land and the Dreaming stories: The stories aid in navigating the land, while the features of the landscape trigger the memory of these stories. This interdependence underscores the inseparability of language and the environment in Aboriginal culture. The practice of writing down these oral traditions, however, risks detaching the stories from their rooted context in the natural world, potentially diminishing their power and significance. Displacing Indigenous people from their ancestral lands effectively strips them of their linguistic and cultural identity, leading to a loss of meaning and coherence in their speech. Such displacement, which often occurs as a result of political or economic “progress,” is a form of cultural genocide.

However, this trend increasingly encounters resistance within technologically advanced societies, fueled by a newfound appreciation for oral traditions and their connection to specific landscapes. Studies highlighting these connections are increasingly used in legal contexts to protect the rights and lands of Indigenous peoples. Examples include Keith Basso’s work with the Western Apache, which helped safeguard their land and water rights, and efforts to protect Aboriginal Dreaming tracks in Australia from development. For cultures like the Amahuaca, Koyukon, Western Apache, and Australian Aboriginals, language and ecological coherence are inseparable, emphasizing that human speech is part of a broader, earth-centered discourse.

Chapters 4-5 Analysis

Abram delves into the transformative impact of alphabetic literacy on human perceptions of and interactions with the natural world, juxtaposing this with the animistic engagement found in oral cultures. These sections offer a critique of the historical shift toward a literate, alphabetic society, which Abram posits as a pivotal moment leading to the modern ecological crisis. By examining the origins and consequences of this shift, Abram articulates his perspective on the complexities underpinning human relationships with the natural world, which is informed by a blend of phenomenology, ecological philosophy, and linguistic analysis. His inquiry into the effects of alphabetic writing continues to reinforce a deep ideological preference for direct, embodied interaction with the natural world. He argues that the adoption of alphabetic literacy, particularly in European civilization, marked a departure from a participatory, animistic consciousness toward a more abstracted, human-centric worldview. This transition, according to Abram, facilitated disconnection from the animate landscape as language became increasingly untethered from its ecological roots, leading to a perception of nature as a passive backdrop to human affairs and a set of resources for human consumption rather than a vibrant, communicative community with which humans were obligated to have a reciprocal relationship.

The text traces human disengagement from the natural world back to the Hebraic and Greek traditions, highlighting how the development of the alphabet and its abstraction of language from the sensuous experiences of the natural world laid the groundwork for a worldview that privileges human-made signs and sounds over direct, sensory engagement with the more-than-human world. In contrast, Abram draws on examples from Indigenous cultures, such as the Amazonian rainforest inhabitants and the Koyukon people of Alaska, to illustrate a fundamentally different approach to language and the environment that develops The Role of Language and Perception in Environmental Consciousness as a theme. These cultures, he argues, maintain a reciprocal relationship with their surroundings, wherein human speech intertwines with and is influenced by the voices of the land and its nonhuman inhabitants. This animistic worldview, characterized by a porous boundary between human language and the expressive life of the landscape, represents a mode of being that modern, literate societies have largely obscured and alludes to the theme of Indigenous Cultures and Sustainable Living Practices.

Abram’s analysis of the impact of literacy on human consciousness and ecological relationships highlights the ways in which alphabetic writing has contributed to a sense of separation from the natural world and raises critiques about the assumptions underlying contemporary Western thought and its implications for environmental ethics and action, supporting the theme of Modern Humanity’s Alienation From the Natural World. However, Abram’s critique of alphabetic literacy and its consequences does not dismiss the complexities of oral and literate cultures outright. Instead, it invites reflection on the potential for integrating the strengths of both modes of engagement. By advocating a renewed appreciation of oral traditions and their capacity to foster a sense of kinship with the natural world, Abram suggests a path toward reconciling the rift between humanity and the more-than-human world. This reconciliation, he implies, is vital not only in addressing current ecological challenges but also for reimagining the role of human beings within the broader tapestry of life on Earth.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text