logo

50 pages 1 hour read

David Epstein

The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2013

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 14-EpilogueChapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 14 Summary: “Sled Dogs, Ultra-runners, and Couch Potato Genes”

Epstein begins Chapter 14 in Alaska, interviewing Iditarod racer and dog-breeder Lance Mackey about his unlikely, challenge-ridden path to Iditarod glory. Mackey’s contributions to the sport of dogsled racing are his “marathon style” and his preference of dogs with the “genes of work ethic” over dogs with the genes of speed (225).

Epstein leaves the dog world and enters the world of mice, detailing several studies that seem to show that genes play a role in the motivation to run and that mice bred from “high runners” have larger brains, indicating that “the centers of the brain that deal with motivation and reward have gotten larger” (234). As one expert says, “In these mice, it’s absolutely the case that motivation has evolved” (234).

Epstein then profiles Ironman triathlete Pam Reed and her extreme workout regimen, stemming from a seemingly compulsive need to be active. She relates herself to a different study of mice that revealed that “brain circuitry similar to that which is active when humans crave food or sex, or when addicts crave drugs, was activated in the high running mice that were denied the chance to run” (237).

Epstein wonders, “Is it possible that, like sled dogs and lab mice, some people are biologically predisposed to get an outsized sense of reward or pleasure from being constantly in motion?” (238). He seeks answers in a study of fraternal and identical twins that demonstrated a large genetic role, and a small environmental role, in the amount of exercise the subjects voluntarily got. Because “physical activity levels respond to the dopamine system” (239), much of the research into any genetic predisposition to want to exercise centers around dopamine-controlling genes.

Chapter 15 Summary: “The Heartbreak Gene: Death, Injury, and Pain on the Field”

Epstein opens Chapter 15 with a heartfelt personal story about a high school friend, Kevin Richards, who died suddenly while crossing the finish line after a race. Richards had, unbeknownst to him, a genetic disease called hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) that caused his heart to fail and that “is the most common cause of sudden death in young athletes” (245). As of 2002, “18 different genes and 1,452 different mutations” have been identified as causes of HCM (247). People who suspect a mutation runs in their family can get tested; athletes, too, can opt to test themselves (but the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act passed by Congress in 2008 makes it illegal for employers to demand genetic information). Doctors who test for HCM mutations face the dilemma of clearing young athletes for participation in sports.

Epstein wonders, “What if the athlete was just at risk of damage? Sports are inherently risky […] what if scientists could tell that some athletes are at greater risk than others?” (252). Epstein launches this inquiry into risk factors by examining the ApoE gene, which is involved in brain health and memory. The ApoE4 variant of the gene appears to influence Alzheimer’s, dementia, and the ability to recover from head trauma. This gene is relevant to athletes in sports like hockey and football in which head injury is common, as an ApoE4 variant combined with a career in a rigorous contact sport means compounded danger. Epstein surveys opinions about whether individual athletes would want, or not want, to get tested for the ApoE4 gene, especially when “there is no proven remedy for delaying the onset of Alzheimer’s” (257). Athletes can also test for mutations in the genes that influence collagen, some of which make a person more prone to tendon and ligament injury.

Finally, Epstein discusses how genes influence pain perception. Some gene mutations block pain perception entirely; others influence how sensitive or tolerant a person is to pain. Furthermore, “genes involved in emotion might alter pain sensation” (262). The brain can also mute pain signals in moments of fight-or-flight—this is meant as a survival mechanism, but it’s also activated in games and competitions, causing some athletes to literally not feel pain until the game is over. Still, one study of dogs that were completely isolated and didn’t process pain revealed that pain must be learned. Epstein closes the chapter wondering if it’s useful to seek out an “athlete gene” considering that genetics and environment are so “intertwined as to become a single vine” (265).

Chapter 16 Summary: “The Gold Medal Mutation”

Epstein travels to the far north of Finland to meet Olympic cross-country skier Eero Mäntyranta and his family. In addition to a colorful description of his trip and his personal impressions of Mäntyranta, Epstein details Mäntyranta’s biography, which began in rural poverty. Mäntyranta developed focus as a way to block out the stimulus in a crowded household. As a child, he skated across a frozen lake and cross-country skied to school. He evacuated Finland with his family during World War II and, as a young man, trained to join the Finnish Olympic team as a means to a job as a border patrol guard. He went on to race in four Olympics, win seven medals, and place in 500 races in his career.

Mäntyranta has a genetic disorder that causes him to have “extraordinarily high levels of hemoglobin, the oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells” (274). Rumors of doping circulated during Mäntyranta’s career, but a genetic test revealed that a “minuscule alteration” in “position 6,002” of one EPOR gene (the gene that tells the body how to build a hormone receptor on bone marrow cells, which produce red blood cells) caused Mäntyranta to have a massively high amount of hemoglobin. This genetic mutation came with no consequences to his health and constituted a huge advantage in the endurance sport that he entered merely to get a better job, but for which he became world-famous.

Epstein catalogues the results of genetic testing done on Mäntyranta’s extended family, looking for other carriers of the gene and other great skiers. He interviews Mäntyranta, who believes it was his mind and not his body that led him to athletic glory, but experts in the science of his genes disagree.

Epilogue Summary: “The Perfect Athlete”

Epstein opens the Epilogue by re-examining the case of Eero Mäntyranta and the way that nature and nurture interplayed in his extraordinary athletic success. Certainly he had a genetic gift, which Chapter 16 explored in detail, but Epstein emphasizes that “he needed to train assiduously to alchemize that talent into Olympic gold” (282). The fact of innate talent and genetic advantage does not detract, Epstein believes, from an athlete’s hard work. Using Michael Jordan as an example, Epstein argues that his “obvious gift of height” does nothing to lessen the awe-worthiness of his achievements (283).

As for the challenges presented by future genetic research in sports, Epstein says:

It is increasing clear that many traits are influenced by the interplay of large numbers of DNA variations. Thus, studies will require hundreds or even thousands of subjects to get at the genetic root of such traits. But there aren’t thousands of elite 100-meter runners in the world. Additionally, the gene variants that make one sprinter fast may be completely distinct from those that make her competitor in the next lane fast (285).

In identifying 23 genes that influence endurance, researchers have made statistical projections that show that a “perfect” endurance athlete is unlikely to exist in the entire global population. Instead, “essentially everybody falls in or near the muddled middle, differing by only a handful of genes” (287). Even children born of two athlete parents are less likely to “get as lucky as a very lucky parent” with traits that require the interplay of more than one gene (288).

Epstein closes by voicing an appreciation for the beauty of the genetic diversity on the planet and for the way sports acts as a showcase for that diversity. He emphasizes that different bodies benefit from different training, but all people benefit in some way from exercise. Thus, he signs off with an encouragement to his reader to participate in exercise or sports, saying, “Happy training.” 

Chapter 14-Epilogue Analysis

Chapter 14 looks into a potential genetic athletic advantage that appears in the brain, rather than in the muscles, bones, or blood. By studying Alaskan huskies who are bred for their work ethic, and mice who demonstrate variations in the voluntary will to exercise, which then appears to grow stronger through generations, Epstein explores the genetic component of motivation. He inquires into human workout “junkies” who describe the need to exercise like an addiction, focusing on Pam Reed, whom he describes as an outlier, and other athletes like her. Epstein uncovers experts who believe motivation is absolutely inherited, though he closes the chapter by acknowledging that dopamine is only one enticement, among other environmental enticements, to exercise—refusing a single, simple conclusion, as he refuses to do in other chapters. Perpetuating his connection of sports medicine to social issues, Epstein also touches on the research into dopamine-related genes and the social significance of drugs like Ritalin, which allow hyperactive children to sit still but which may, according to experts, contribute to a childhood obesity epidemic by “driving their activity levels down” (240).

Chapter 15 contains a personal story from Epstein’s life that grounds the study of the HCM genes in real people’s life stories and underscores the gravity of certain genetic mutations as well as the burden of knowing about them ahead of time. Epstein explores the emotional ramifications of sequencing one’s own genome to test for HCM, ApoE4, and other mutations. He also discusses the legal framework that’s arisen to protect people from employers who would use genetic testing in employment decisions.

Epstein closes this chapter with a discussion of pain—its inherited and learned components, as well as the way survival mechanisms in the brain can be activated during intense competition to protect athletes from feeling pain. This chapter addresses the complex social and cultural implications of the scientific subjects at hand, including the economic incentives of sports organizations to test prospective recruits. Epstein resists coming to a simple conclusion about genetic testing for potentially dangerous mutations, though he does appear more opinionated here than in other areas of the book when he expresses that saving a life is more important than saving an athletic career, as he is admittedly influenced by the death of his friend many years ago.

Chapter 16 keeps a uniquely narrow focus on a single subject, Eero Mäntyranta, and the single gene mutation that gave him a major physiological advantage in endurance sports. This story comes in the final chapter and is the closest thing Epstein has found to a single “sports gene.” Epstein carries through his theme of economics in sports, highlighting Mäntyranta’s unlikely training (skiing to school) during his impoverished youth and underlining how Mäntyranta’s motivation for skiing professionally was always to get a better job and not a love for the sport. Epstein focuses on the details of Mäntyranta’s personality, the members of his family, and the contours of his upbringing. He also offers a scientific description of the genetic mutation Mäntyranta possesses, describing the biological function of the gene in close-up detail, emphasizing the smallness and singularity of this mutation in contrast with its enormous impact on Mäntyranta’s life and career.

In the Epilogue, Epstein revisits several of his subjects from earlier in the book through the lens of his major thematic statement: that genetics and environment are involved in every athlete’s story. He addresses the notion that candid discussion about an athlete’s genes detracts from his/her skill and argues that the media is more likely to diminish the role of genetics than to over-emphasize it. This is part of a pattern of Epstein critiquing how sports narratives misconstrue or misunderstand genetic contribution in sports. Epstein also discusses prospects of engineering the “perfect athlete,” but he does so with a wary tone, based on where genetic science is and on the statistical odds that the perfect athlete could even exist. He closes with a celebration of biological diversity and a positive message about the benefits of training and exercise. While Epstein emphasizes throughout the book that science is neutral, his view of the way sports and the human body interact is ultimately optimistic.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By David Epstein