54 pages • 1 hour read
Isabel AllendeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This guide contains descriptions of mass violence, antisemitism, genocide, discrimination, and hate crimes, which are depicted in The Wind Knows My Name.
Throughout the novel, characters consistently deny that horrible things are happening or will happen to and around them. Many Vienna residents consider oppression of Jewish communities temporary, insisting that the growing antisemitism will fade instead of escalating. Likewise, El Mozote residents try to live regular lives after the attack, simply moving to caves when they anticipate another attack. In the present, many ignore the refugee crisis; only a handful of individuals like Selena acknowledge the gravity of the crisis. These denials or apathy reflect the dangers of refusing to confront and resolve oppression: In most cases, denying it allows it to expand and harm even more people.
When Leticia returns to El Mozote as an adult, the narrator thus characterizes her guide: “That had been his life growing up, constantly fleeing” (64). His life of fear over another attack is an expression of denial because it provides only a temporary solution to the problem. Similarly, in Vienna, Rudolph shifts to seeing Peter in his back room and goes out less frequently, while Samuel starts attending school at his aunt Leah’s, which likewise reveal denial. However, the larger migrations, such as Leticia’s journey north with her father and Samuel’s escape to England, provide a more legitimate outlet away from oppression. In either case, though, violence and oppression recur, and those enduring that oppression must either experience violence firsthand or hide. This acceptance of oppression as a facet of daily life is best expressed in Anita’s frequent repetition of “That’s life” when discussing unfortunate or oppressive circumstances. Accepting oppression allows it to grow and develop into even worse forms of violence.
More broadly, denying atrocities costs Samuel his identity and removes Leticia from her heritage. Not until 1995, almost 60 years after Samuel fled Vienna, does he confront his past and begin the journey to resolve the impact of trauma on his life. His solitary nature, cultivated in England and reinforced with distance from his heritage, led him to regret his “indifference,” which is a direct consequence of living as though he didn’t experience tremendous loss as a child. Once he can express that loss to Anita and Leticia, he overcomes some of the trauma he experienced, but he notes that he can’t remove the years of indifference that characterize his life. Thus, during and after atrocities, acknowledging them is critical to overcoming oppression, while denial, though convenient at times, simply prolongs and deepens the issues.
Part of Samuel’s trauma is evident in his biological family’s removal from his life. As with Anita, losing his parents removed critical support necessary to function regularly, let alone in times of severe oppression and violence. Throughout the novel, family is the greatest source of strength, and situations they face without family are exponentially more challenging. These instances are sometimes innocuous, as in Nadine’s journey to London with only Samuel to initially support her, but are often intense and painful, such as Samuel’s discovery of his parents’ deaths and Anita’s imaginary conversations with Claudia. While some (like Selena and Frank) have their full families present in their lives, forming solid support systems, others (like Samuel and Anita) find the support they need to develop as individuals only by creating new families composed of friends who can fill those roles. Most importantly, the novel portrays family as the individual’s greatest defense against lasting trauma, as in Samuel and Anita’s relationship.
For Selena and Frank, elements like the last name Durán, meaning long-lasting or enduring, as well as the meatballs that Frank’s mother sends him, show the power of a strong family connection. Selena derives strength from the experiences of her mother, grandmother, and great-grandmother, just as Frank grounds his identity in the Brooklyn home he shared with his parents and siblings. Samuel, however, rejects Jewish culture in England because he lacks that affirming connection with his family, which leads him to struggle in forming an identity of his own. Instead, he forms a career and family, and he’s unable to adjust to Nadine’s overflowing generosity with strangers, which robs him of time to bond with her and leaves him alone for periods of their marriage and after her death. For Anita, the desire for family is strong, as she anticipates her mother’s return, much as Samuel thought his parents would return after World War II. In the end, in accepting Samuel and Leticia as her new family, Anita begins the process of resolving her trauma.
At the novel’s end, Selena and Samuel disagree on when and how to tell Anita her mother is dead. Selena thinks they should wait for Anita to adjust to her new home, noting that “a lot of love and support” (245) can help prepare her for the news. Here, Selena speaks from experience, knowing that a good family can help one recover from trauma, but Samuel, too, speaks from experience, reflecting his own isolation in the aftermath of his parents’ deaths: “This kind of trauma isn’t something you ever get over” (245). However, both characters are correct, because while a new family can’t overwrite the loss of one’s original family, the strength of a family structure can help one better process and accept loss.
The novel frequently depicts objectification of and violence against women, specifically those who are particularly vulnerable. This culminates in the discovery of the mass grave on the property of Carlos Gómez, who represents violence and oppression against women, a theme present in other situations too, such as the increasing oppression of Jewish communities leading up to the Holocaust in the early chapters and the refugee crisis in the novel’s present day. Just as a Chilean official uses Rachel Adler for her sexuality, countless other women experience abuse and assault. However, Allende makes it clear that all women are in a vulnerable position if society as a whole refuses to address crimes against them both within and outside of specific crises.
Anita represents the example of greatest vulnerability in the text: While staying in a foster home with Susan and Mr. Rick, Anita is almost assaulted by Mr. Rick. At this point, she’s a child and a ward of the state, which puts her in a vulnerable position given her lack of knowledge of English, her dependence on the foster care system, and her inability to quickly reach family or friends. Fortunately, Anita has the support of Selena and has the quick instinct to bite Mr. Rick and scream, alerting others to his attempted assault. However, Anita must convince herself that calling attention to such an assault is okay, reassuring Claudia, “It’s not true that if we scream or we tell someone what happens they’ll kick us out” (195). Often, characters reassure themselves of things they doubt, and, in Anita’s position, she’s likely aware that Susan or others involved in foster care might not believe her if she tells them she was assaulted. Most importantly, though, is Mr. Rick’s fairly common perspective, in which he sees Anita as an easy target because of her dependence on the system of which he’s a part.
Numerous minor encounters, such as Frank’s objectification of Selena or Milosz’s desire to “train” her, show how men view women in unhealthy and oppressive lights. However, the most crucial element in the novel’s discussion of gendered violence is Doña Eduvigis’s insistence on protesting against the El Salvador government for failing to take action against those who perpetrate violence against women. Although this protest is focused in El Salvador, it applies globally, given that violence against women continues largely unabated around the world. That exposing a particularly violent offender like Gómez was necessary to spur the government to act emphasizes this point, but the efforts of women like Selena and Doña Eduvigis highlight how dedicated individuals can bring about change.
By Isabel Allende
Books About Race in America
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Diverse Voices (High School)
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Hispanic & Latinx American Literature
View Collection
Historical Fiction
View Collection
Immigrants & Refugees
View Collection
International Holocaust Remembrance Day
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
World War II
View Collection