logo

39 pages 1 hour read

Sigmund Freud

Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1905

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Essay Topics

1.

Freud often mentions in the first essay, “The Sexual Aberrations,” that sexual abnormality and normality cannot realistically be separated from each other. What are the implications of this idea for Freud’s thought about sexuality in general? What criteria does he use for determining whether or not someone has become pathological in their sexuality?

2.

Freud frequently laments the fact that topics he considers important—such as sexual development in childhood—are misunderstood and under-researched. He also admits the shortcomings of his own investigations, due to the novelty of the field. Consider the development of sexological research in the 19th century, including the work of Krafft-Ebing, with its elaborate discussion of sexual pathologies. How does Freud build on their work? Why were Freud’s ideas and methods innovative? How did he influence his contemporaries?

3.

Consider Freud’s attitude toward homosexuality, or inversion. On one hand, he acknowledges the important (and often accepted) role homosexual bonds played in many ancient societies, such as ancient Greece. But on the other hand, he still considers it to be a perversion and something that normal development must resist falling into. How does this ambiguity manifest itself in Freud’s thought in these essays? Is Freud’s stance as a scientifically minded empirical investigator contradicted by the important role played by normative forms of sexuality in these essays?

4.

Freud claims that forms of sexual dysfunction such as hysteria and neuroticism are in some ways the opposite of open perversion. How does Freud characterize these different types of dysfunction? How do they differ from other forms of dysfunction, and who tends to suffer from these conditions? Why are these differences significant?

5.

While childhood is central to Freud’s thought, he also claims that adults tend to suffer from infant amnesia—that is to say, they forget or only dimly remember their early years of life. What role does this amnesia have in the theories expounded upon in these essays? How can the limitations to research imposed by this amnesia be overcome? What is its relation to hysterical amnesia?

6.

Discuss Freud’s descriptions of women’s sexuality and women’s sexual development. To what extent can we say that Freud is merely describing facts about late 19th-century Viennese female psychology and to what extent must we say that his ideas are misogynistic?

7.

Freud describes childhood as a crucial stage of development in which many traits that will or at least could become important in later life—sexual desire, connections with others, even a penchant for cruelty—begin to take form. What is the relationship between these traits in childhood, and how they can manifest themselves in adults? What factors determine whether or not these traits develop in healthy or dysfunctional ways?

8.

Describe Freud’s theory of instinct or drive, especially as he develops it across the three essays. Is instinct biological or psychological or both?

9.

Sublimation is a mechanism that blocks or redirects the sexual instinct that Freud represents as having positive effects for civilization. How does sublimation work? How is it different from other mechanisms that divert instinct, such as repression or displacement?

10.

In 2017, Verso Books, a left-wing publishing house, put out a surprising translation of the Three Essays that reprints only the original 1905 work. Its translators and editors make the startling claim that the 1905 book is radically different than the standard version. They write that it contains “emancipatory potential” and that it is free from heteronormative assumptions or the Oedipus complex that feminists disparage. Read at least the introduction to the work and explore the claims of these editors. Should we all be reading the 1905 edition now? Why or why not?

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text