logo

50 pages 1 hour read

Ken Bain

What the Best College Students Do

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2012

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 3-4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 3 Summary: “Managing Yourself”

If we observe how we think, we can learn how to do it better. If we don’t think about our thinking, we can get stuck in ruts that prevent mental growth. For example, if history students assume that all people in all times share roughly the same values, then every past culture, from ancient Greece to early-20th-century America, will seem indecipherable. Once students realize that their easy assumptions may be false, they open their minds to the possibility that vastly different viewpoints and preferences can prevail in other times and cultures.

It’s hard to notice when our hard-won models of the world break down; these “expectation failures” must be “shocking and bold” before we give up our beliefs and do the hard work of re-thinking our position (68). Often, students resist new facts that threaten their worldview. Deep learners, however, enjoy intellectual surprise; they find learning “deeply exciting” and look forward to tackling puzzles and experiencing uncomfortable situations that might expand their understanding.

One way to test mental adaptability is with the candle-matches-tacks problem: Students must devise a way to attach a lit candle upright to a wall using tacks and a box of matches. (A simple answer: remove the matches, tack the box to the wall, prop the candle inside the box, and light it.)

The human brain can be thought of as divided roughly into three sections: the “Spock brain,” the “alligator brain,” and the “pleasure brain.” The Spock brain builds and stores models that interpret sensory input. The alligator brain—an almond-sized structure called the amygdala—reacts quickly to threats, generating fight-or-flight responses and overriding the Spock brain. Test anxiety generated by the alligator brain can interfere with the Spock brain’s work.

The Spock brain can be on auto-pilot, or mindless, or it can be “mindful”—open to new possibilities. One way to keep the mind open involves changing “is” statements to “could be” statements; for example, “This is a dog’s chew toy” can be changed to “This could be a dog’s chew toy” (75). Another way is to augment the study of history by imagining oneself as a character in a particular time period, or to learn anatomy by mentally assembling one’s body from parts.  

The brain uses a number of shortcuts that can impede learning. “Myside bias” gives preference to one’s own or one’s group’s beliefs. “Vividness bias” makes us choose dramatic information over statistics. “Framing” a question can affect the answer: A tax cut sounds good, while decreasing government services can sound bad, yet they can be the same thing. Getting a “bonus” makes people more spendthrift than getting a “rebate”; calling a project “work” gets poorer results than calling it a “game.” Successful students search for evidence that contradicts their assumptions; they also apply thinking skills acquired in one subject to other fields of study, and they reframe ideas to suit their own needs rather than succumbing to the framing rules set by others. They seek out academic departments and professors who challenge them with new perspectives on the material they’re learning.

The third, or “pleasure,” brain encourages us to enjoy our interactions with the world. This includes feelings of awe, enthusiasm, and excitement. The pleasure brain rewards the process more than the results. Laughter and lighthearted playfulness generate better problem solving than seriousness or a sense of obligation.

Negative attitudes about alleged intellectual limitations among women and under-served population groups can undermine the performance of these groups even when they don’t agree with the stereotype, making them self-conscious at exam time. Remedies include simply becoming aware of the stereotyping process so that it weighs less heavily and reminding oneself of one’s strengths, talents, and unique abilities. Female physics students at the University of Colorado were asked at the start of the semester to write an essay about people, things, and interests they held dear; they subsequently outperformed everyone else in the physics class. Simply affirming one’s values increases one’s sense of competence.

Mary Ann Hopkins grew up surrounded by books and art; she and her family vacationed in foreign countries to learn about other places. She thought relaxing meant searching for new things to learn. Mary Ann absorbed books, learned sewing, loved math, and read mystery novels. At Harvard, she studied Latin and theater design; in the summers, she and her sister helped kids in orphanages in India and Somalia. Mary Ann got a master’s in medical history at Cambridge and an MD from Harvard; she taught surgery at New York University, where she developed innovative computer programs to help teach surgical practice. As a member of Doctors Without Borders, Mary Ann spends several weeks each year treating impoverished or war-torn patients overseas. Her varied cultural and intellectual experiences helped her shape a life of service that suits her unique talents and skills, and her openness to new ideas has helped her to do innovative work in medicine. Mary Ann’s story is mindfulness personified. 

Chapter 4 Summary: “Learning How to Embrace Failure”

Failures can be painful, but they also can teach useful lessons. Successful students embrace failure and learn from it. Failure also can lead to unnecessarily negative outcomes. A confident student can have a bad experience in a difficult class and decide to avoid challenging courses in the future. Summertime fun may distract a student from study preparation until time runs out and he can’t pass the exam, so he explains away his mistake with the belief that he’s just not that smart anyway.

A common thought error that limits success is to believe that intelligence is fixed and that either people are smart or they aren’t. In fact, intelligence is trainable, and effort is more important than native talent. A group of 10-year-olds were given a set of puzzles to solve: The first puzzles were fairly easy, and all the kids got the answers right and enjoyed themselves. The second set of puzzles were too hard to solve in the time allotted. One group of children struggled and gave up; another group kept trying. The ones who quit spoke as if they believed they weren’t smart enough; those who persisted seemed to feel that, with time and patience, the problems could be solved: “they didn’t see failure as a sign that they were dumb. They saw it as something they hadn’t learned yet” (108).

IQ tests reinforce the idea that intelligence is fixed. Some teachers believe that the smart students will “get it” and the rest won’t. Adults often compliment children on their brains, but it’s more powerful to praise them for their efforts. When people believe they’re born smart, they often become passive in the face of challenges. If, instead, they believe they’ve become smart through practice and training, they’re more adaptive when big problems loom.

Tom Springer and his brother listened by the hour as their mother read them challenging adventure books—Mark Twain, L. Frank Baum, and the like—and they loved school. When the family moved to Michigan, the school was much less demanding yet more regimented, and Tom became a listless student, graduating with a C average. He bounced around from job to job until, taking courses at a community college, he discovered a love for writing, earned a master’s degree in environmental journalism, became a filmmaker and published writer, and worked as a project manager at the Kellogg Foundation, helping kids get inspiration through reconnecting with nature.

Tom found his way to a successful career helping others because his love of learning began early with his mother, from whom he discovered the sound of good writing, and because he never gave up on his ability to become smarter and more capable even in the face of his own doubts.

Much of success in the face of failures depends on how a person interprets a setback. Is it because of inner limitations? Is it because of external factors that can’t be changed? Or is it a situation that can be improved or worked around? If a problem appears to be out of a person’s control, that person will give up, but if they think of the problem as solvable, they persist in seeking a path to a successful outcome. This is called “self-efficacy”: “You must know how to do something, but you must also believe that you can” (118).

The spectrum of intelligence once was seen as a fixed ladder, with some people at the top and the rest farther down. This view evolved toward the idea that people on lower rungs could climb higher with effort. Paul Baker suggested that intelligence isn’t a ladder at all, but more like a tree whose branches and leaves grow with time. In that respect, each student brings a unique viewpoint and set of abilities to each problem or challenge under study. Education becomes less a competitive sport and more of a collegial and cooperative venture.

After college, Jeff Hawkins worked at Intel, where he wanted to do research on brain theory, but there wasn’t yet enough knowledge about the brain to begin such a project. At GRiD Systems, Jeff helped develop the first tablet computer. He realized that mobile devices might be the future, but, again, the knowledge and technology just weren’t there yet. He attended graduate school in biophysics, then started the companies Palm and Handspring, which launched the mobile device industry. Then he co-founded Numenta, a company that studies the brain and how its intelligence can be translated into machine learning. Jeff’s persistence and success comes from his belief that, if an obstacle arises, he would “try to find a solution if I could” (125).

A study by Columbia and Stanford researchers recruited inner-city middle-school kids, who had performed poorly on math tests, to take a course on improving study habits. Everyone received the same training, except that some students read aloud an article that explained how the brain can grow with learning practice, while the other students read about how memory works. The first group improved motivation by 27%, while the second group’s motivation grew by only 9%. The first group’s math performance improved as well.

Debra Goldson, a Jamaican immigrant to New York, studied hard in school so she could become a doctor and help her mother, who had a poorly understood heart ailment. Debra loved math and reading, and her efforts produced good grades, but along the way she was sometimes discouraged by counselors and professionals who didn’t believe in her. Debra received a 99th-percentile score on the MCAT exam, but the first medical school that accepted her required all Black entrants to take remedial summer courses; she turned down the offer. A much more highly ranked school, Columbia, accepted her. Debra excelled in differential diagnoses and was praised for her clinical work. She later established a highly respected practice in New Jersey. A chief lesson Debra learned is that “I now define being smart in terms of how hard you try” (132). 

Chapters 3-4 Analysis

Chapters 3 and 4 discuss the roadblocks, pitfalls, and mistaken assumptions that can impede learning and success.

The candle-matchbox-tacks problem is one of many brain teasers that can help students think more widely and creatively. Another example is the driver in a two-seater sports car on a chilly, rain-swept night who pulls up across from a bus stop, where three wet people shiver: the driver’s best friend, to whom the driver owes a great favor; an elderly lady, clearly suffering from exposure; and a third person who, the driver realizes with sudden intuitive clarity, could be the love of the driver’s life. The driver’s vehicle is small, and four people can’t fit in it. What should the driver do? One elegant answer is that the driver hands the car keys to the best friend so the friend and the elderly lady can get to their homes, and the driver stays at the bus stop with the third person so they can meet and begin a possible relationship.

One concern with the author’s model of successful learning is that it might require students to change their personalities. Deep learners “enjoyed the challenge of the unknown”; they “often plunged into new situations with almost childlike enthusiasm” and liked “challenging their existing models of reality with jarring sensations” (70). This paints a picture of a hyperactive adventurer, which might not fit everyone’s learning styles, attitudes, and natural preferences. On the other hand, education is, in large part, a quiet activity with few or no physical dangers; even shy, cautious students can enjoy the adventures of learning in the quiet of their dorm rooms and the privacy of their minds.

In Chapter 4, the author describes situations in which people with fixed views of intelligence encounter problems that exceed their abilities. These people tend to freeze up, and they either go into denial because they don’t want to think that they might not be smart, or they back away from the problem with some version of the excuse that “it can’t be helped.” These people also are likely to believe that their smarts are limited. When a problem or challenge exceeds their ability to solve it, they may panic and freeze up or give up.

This is where the concept that intelligence grows to meet increased demands can be powerfully useful. If there’s no tight limit to intelligence, then even daunting problems can potentially be overcome with persistence and determination. A key difference between successful students and others is the belief in one’s ability to solve problems. In one study, researchers discovered that “students needed to learn the right procedures, but they also had to believe that they could use them appropriately” (118). Suppose, however, that the student doesn’t yet possess the skills needed to solve a given problem. A self-efficacious learner will be more likely to believe she can acquire the knowledge and skills needed and then use that learning to solve the problem. Self-efficacy, then, evolves into a general-purpose attitude that improves the odds of success in any number of pursuits. This approach, when enhanced by a supportive college experience, can be life-changing.

Not only is intelligence expandable, but also there are endless ways to be smart—scientific, literary, physical, emotional, and in combinations. It’s widely understood that old methods of measuring intelligence, such as IQ tests and AP exams, measure only certain forms of intelligence and that they don’t delimit the areas for intellectual growth; their usefulness is in evaluating current potential among student applicants to highly competitive schools. As the book points out, that potential can grow and shift within any student, and those who test poorly now may increase their test scores later. For this reason, higher education has increasingly been made available to all: In the US in 2019, 36% of citizens possessed bachelor’s degrees, and that number continues to rise.

When we compare ourselves to others, we tend to stop growing: If we’re the best, there’s no need to improve; if others are better, we often give up. Either way, there’s no incentive to learn more or develop our talents. Students who compete with themselves, on the other hand, can grow indefinitely, and every achievement sets a new benchmark to overcome. Those who are curious about the world will find an endless number of questions to answer, and pursuing those questions will feed growth in a never-ending process. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text