55 pages • 1 hour read
Pema ChödrönA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Not causing harm is fundamental to Buddhism. Sometimes, unable to bear their own pain, people become aggressive and cause harm to others and to themselves. Furthermore, people are often unable to accept warnings about their behavior. When one becomes mindful of this process, Chödrön suggests, they naturally step back from aggression.
Mindfulness isn’t just for meditation. It can also be applied in one’s daily life to avoid suppressing pain and refrain from keeping oneself constantly entertained: “It’s the practice of not immediately filling up space just because there’s a gap” (45). This includes noticing habits like scratching one’s nose or pulling on an ear to calm anxiety. Those quick actions block people from feelings that they need to experience but prefer to avoid.
Beneath avoidance is a sense of groundlessness, “something very soft, very tender, that we experience as fear or edginess” (46). The way to transcend fear isn’t to disagree with it or defy it, Chödrön says, but to respect it yet refrain from doing what it commands. As fear itself might put it, “if you don’t do what I say, I have no power” (47). Sitting with feelings, rather than acting upon them, prevents them from expanding and instead evokes calm.
The harm that people cause comes from ignorance of the self. Meditation, on the other hand, allows people to become more familiar with who they are: By learning about one’s reactions and noticing which aren’t appropriate, one naturally experiences more peace. A mountain lake whose waters are churned up reveals nothing; one that’s calm reflects everything.
In Chödrön’s view, the first step on the path is to realize that there’s no hope of arriving at a permanently wonderful place. No matter how one twists and turns to make happiness solid and everlasting, life pulls that possibility away. People find that they “can’t get any ground under [their] feet” (53).
This leads to “nontheism,” or the abandonment of the hope that a god will protect one from sorrow. Nontheism does not purport that there isn’t a god, but that such a being won’t prevent suffering. People must, therefore, come to terms with anxieties without a safety net; otherwise, they “abdicate [their] responsibilities” (53) and cling to anything, even the Buddhist Dharma.
Chödrön notes that suffering is a part of life; it’s not a mistake. People, though, turn their hope for less pain into an obsessive pursuit. Feeling inadequate, people yearn for better, but hope and fear go hand in hand. Abandoning hope, though, makes room for people to feel “some kind of confidence in our basic sanity” (55).
One can then renounce their dependence on alcohol, sex, and the like, not because they’re wrong, but because people use them as “babysitters.” Instead, one practices hopelessness, the feeling that there’s nothing they can do about themself and therefore no reason not to encounter life in all its shifting fullness.
The fundamental thing people fear is death. It seems remote, and people push it away, but it’s always there. Death comes daily in little ways: disappointments, a job that fails, a relationship that collapses. People avoid this pain by freezing stoically, or escalating emotionally, or distracting themselves. Chödrön suggests that it’s better to be simple, to go to the “bare bones” of the thing and discover the joy of life and death together.
The eight worldly dharmas consist of four pairs of opposites: pleasure and pain, praise and blame, fame and disgrace, and gain and loss. These feel significant, but people make them up—being old might seem negative to one person but positive to another, for example—and thus none are “concrete.” People react to them in accordance with their beliefs about what’s good and bad in the world.
In meditation, one can learn how this works. Someone says something and one feels insulted, as if slapped in the face, but the entire pain is imagined. Even happy thoughts dazzle people, and they get “swept away” by them.
A story is connected to the person who brought Buddhism to Tibet, Padmasambhava, also called Guru Rinpoche. As a child, he delighted everyone, and the king brought him to live in the palace. One day, little Padmasambhava was playing on the roof with two of the king’s ritual instruments. Curious about them, he dropped them from the roof to see what would happen. They landed on two passersby and killed them. The public was outraged and demanded the child be exiled. Padmasambhava thus learned about the dichotomy of fame and disgrace, and this cured him of the eight worldly dharmas.
This understanding leads to “nonattachment,” which does not mean cool disinterest, but curiosity and compassion. Seeing how one gets hooked, they realize that this is true for other people as well; “we spontaneously feel more tenderness for the human race” (67). This motivates people to begin to want to help others as well as themselves.
Letting go of the need for resolution—to solve one’s problems once and for all—allows people to discover an openness to paradox and uncertainty. Doing this, though, can feel abrupt and overwhelming. This requires courage.
Chödrön acknowledges that it is challenging to avoid the urge to move one way or another to avoid discomfort. This is true, for example, of loneliness. If one can sit with that feeling, they encounter a “cool loneliness” that has six components.
The first component is “less desire.” When one permits feelings of loneliness, even for only a minute or so, this reduces the urge to make that feeling go away. They’re no longer “seduced by [their] Very Important Story Lines” (73), like having to be a winner or believing they’re trapped in victimhood.
The second component is “contentment,” or the ability to have nothing and thus nothing to lose. With time, jumpiness subsides and one can sit with the feeling without having to fix it. The third quality is “avoiding unnecessary activities” (74). Rather than searching for companions to deaden the feeling, one becomes willing to not have a fix for loneliness.
“Complete discipline” is the fourth component. This means a gentle willingness to return to the present when one starts to panic about being lonely. Busying oneself with others prevents them from seeing things as they are: “We are cheating ourselves when we run away from the ambiguity of loneliness” (75).
The fifth component is “Not wandering in the world of desire” (75). People stop searching everywhere for comforting ways to keep the pain of loneliness at bay. They no longer behave like children looking for their mother. The sixth component is “not seeking security from one’s discursive thoughts” (76). One no longer seeks the company of internal chatter about their beliefs and theories.
Cool Loneliness isn’t itself a solution to one’s problems; it’s an awareness that there aren’t any solutions. When loneliness appears, one can take it as an opportunity to open oneself to the spaciousness of their heart.
Existence has three truths or marks: “impermanence, suffering, and egolessness” (79). Chödrön acknowledges that these sound negative, but counters that they are in fact fundamental and joyful.
Impermanence is the nature of things. Seasons come and go, people meet and part, light and dark trade places, young become old. People prefer permanent things, but when they cease to struggle against change, they harmonize with life’s sacred connectedness.
Suffering sounds awful, yet pleasure always goes with pain; each generates and tempers the other. Inspiration connects one to the sacred, but alone it leads to arrogance; wretchedness weakens people, but it humbles and softens their hearts. Both sides thus can be appreciated (81).
Egolessness isn’t a loss but a gain. When people are not self-absorbed, their natural goodness radiates outward. To be egoless is to accept the world as it is with “unconditional joy.”
When one recognizes impermanence as ever-present, they cease fighting it. A sense of mindful curiosity arises, and one notices the lack of intelligence in their habitual reactions. They can do this as well with their suffering. As this process continues, one experiences moments of egolessness, when they encounter life without defenses.
Openness and curiosity often lead to a feeling of peace, which some consider the fourth truth of life. When one lives unprotected by assumptions and instead encounters the world with openness and curiosity, they may find a sense of peace and realize that their “fundamental situation is joyful” (86).
Just before he became awakened, the Buddha was attacked by four demons, or Maras. Each mara wielded weapons, but the swords and arrows turned into flowers. The maras were obstacles in the path of enlightenment that, properly considered, became allies.
Two types of obstacles, outer and inner, can bedevil a person. Outer obstacles are other people or situations that appear to harm a person. Inner obstacles consist of one’s objection to the way life is; one believes it should be different, and therefore fights against it. A problem persists until one accepts it, whereupon they “learn whatever it has to teach” them (88).
Each of the four maras is a way of avoiding one’s experience. The first is called devaputra mara, the seeking after pleasure. People do this to distract from or dampen negative feelings; Chödrön offers addiction and busyness as common examples. Noticing this process can open people to compassion for themselves and others.
The second obstacle is skandha mara, when one suffers a great loss that shatters their illusions of control. As quickly as possible, a person reconstructs their self-belief to feel safe again. This mara, though, is an opportunity: If one doesn’t rebuild their ego sense but instead explores their reactions with curiosity and openness, they have a chance to avoid resurrecting the burden of ego and instead retain the fundamental attitude of “not knowing.”
The third mara is klesha mara, the tendency to turn a setback into a significant crisis. People prefer strong feelings to uncertainty, so they ruminate, exaggerate the problem, and dramatize it, using their emotions to try to force things back into the old framework, which felt more solid. Seeing the truth of this, one no longer takes big emotions so seriously; one also can develop an empathy for other people’s tendency to dramatize their feelings.
The fourth mara, yama mara, appears when a person finally begins to take action, perhaps through meditation, and starts to think that, with a bit more effort, their life will be perfect. This static concept, though, is itself a form of death—the very thing that, at bottom, everyone fears: “We are killing the moment by controlling our experience” (94). Inevitably, something will happen that demolishes one’s confident assumptions.
Life isn’t about certainty; instead, one can respond to challenges with an open heart. By accepting problems rather than finding ways to avoid them, people turn the swords of the demons into flowers.
In these chapters, the author adds more detail on how meditation affects a person’s outlook.
Chödrön describes a sense of aliveness that comes from letting go of problems. A quote attributed to Franz Kafka addresses it thusly:
You do not need to leave your room. Remain sitting at your table and listen. Do not even listen, simply wait, be quiet still and solitary. The world will freely offer itself to you to be unmasked, it has no choice, it will roll in ecstasy at your feet (Kafka, Franz. The Aphorisms of Franz Kafka. Princeton University Press, 2022).
In Zen Buddhism, this idea is expressed as “thunderous silence.”
Chödrön emphasizes that meditation is itself both the practice and the result. Simply to sit with oneself—whether bored, worried, impatient, fearful, or angry—is to receive deep lessons from one’s feelings. Observing one’s feelings gives one the gift of understanding and a chance to transcend daily agonies. Only by accepting them can one go through them. However, people miss out on what’s already there when they become impatient during meditation. What appears as boring nothingness, when accepted, sometimes grows into expansive, blissful quietude. If, though, one searches for this sensation during meditation, it refuses to appear.
Buddhists believe that the human tendency to grasp at pleasure and resist pain comes from the misperception that egos are somehow separate entities that can reach into people’s lives, tinker with them, and somehow improve them. The thing that reaches in, though, is oneself—the thing that needs fixing is the thing doing the repairs. Likewise, running from pain is like trying to escape one’s shadow, and hurrying toward pleasures is like a dog chasing its tail. People, then, can no more make things better than they can fix the universe.
People can, however, see the futility of this effort, abandon it, and come to realize that they’re not a mistake but a part of life that’s already flowing along as it should. Problems will still persist, storms may destroy homes, and people may continue treating one another horribly, but at least people no longer have to run around in circles, wasting their lives in a futile attempt to correct the “wrong” parts of life. Instead, people can do what they can, help where they can, and otherwise (as the author puts it in the next section) “let it be as it is” (120).
Chödrön discusses impermanence as an important feature of reality. The concept of impermanence touches on a basic precept of Buddhist philosophy, that there are no absolute certainties. It’s also part of the book’s theme on Groundless Openness as an Antidote to Suffering. A certainty is concrete, but nothing in life lasts forever. During the 1930s, mathematician Kurt Gödel proved that every logical system contains contradictions; his informal example was the grammatically correct sentence, “This statement is false.” For similar reasons, Buddhists warn that chasing after permanence and ultimate security is bound to fail. Feeling sure of one’s path isn’t evidence of permanence; it’s simply proof that one feels convinced.
Giving up all thought of achieving permanent safety and security can lead to a sense of “helplessness.” In addressing this, Chödrön cites Shunryu Suzuki, who popularized Soto Zen Buddhism in America with his book Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind. She paraphrases his quote about how life is like a boat that leaves the harbor, sails out onto the ocean, and sinks. Her and Suzuki’s point is that life ultimately fails to be about what people want, but it definitely offers an experience. Whether one is willing to take it on its own terms and rejoice in all its ups and downs—like the famous literary character Zorba the Greek, who relished “the whole disaster”—is up to them.
Egolessness, a companion to groundlessness, arises when people are not trying to prove things, reform the world, or improve themselves. People tend to be more pleasant when they’re not preoccupied; it’s refreshing to bump into relaxed folks, and it’s a pleasure to notice it as well in oneself. It’s what emerges when people are not in conflict with things.
Chödrön brings up loneliness as an example of how a specific feeling that people wish to avoid can instead be accepted. This applies just as well to other feelings—anger, yearning, disappointment, and so forth—and the result is similar: People are no longer driven to resolve the feeling but instead allow the unpleasantness to flow through them, whereupon it often recedes or even dissolves altogether. Chödrön calls this “cool loneliness,” a quiet and refreshing solitude. Later, people can be with people in a loving way instead of expressing neediness. With the periodic solitude of Cool Loneliness, those spaces no longer frighten; instead, they refresh and recharge.
The six components of cool loneliness—less desire, contentment, avoiding busyness, full discipline, not wandering in desire, and not hiding in thoughts—are really six different ways of saying the same thing. When people accept their emotions, they shift, or transform, and become something not to be avoided but simply moods to be experienced. The attitude of assent toward one’s feelings changes their character. Each time a person moves from resistance to acceptance, they experience the sensation of discovery, of newness: Pains and sorrows become gentler; they have things to tell a person; one can learn from them each time with a fresh sense of wonder.
The author discusses “nontheism,” her term for using religion as a coping mechanism. She’s not anti-religious or anti-God; her point is that people often use their religious convictions and practices to avoid feelings of pain and disappointment. Buddhism, especially the Mahayana variety that includes the Tibetan branch, centers its focus not on a particular god, but on “awakening,” or enlightenment. This perceptual shift changes a person’s view of life and the universe. Those who have had this experience tend no longer to regard themselves as separate, lonely beings but as essential aspects of the world. Mindfulness practice, meanwhile, confers benefits regardless of religious affiliation.
When people act, they receive feedback from the environment—some pleasing, some painful—but if they only accept the good feelings, they fail to learn the lessons offered by the bad ones. People keep making the same mistakes over and over: “What we call obstacles are really the way the world and our entire experience teach us where we’re stuck” (87). Accepting everything one feels, on the other hand, allows them to receive the feedback, and their nervous system adjusts accordingly. When people absorb the wisdom conferred by pain, they can move on to the next activity. Acceptance thus unfreezes a person, and they regain their life.